Cited by 1,755Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition – An ESPEN Consensus Statement

Open access
Cederholm, T., Bosaeus, I., Barazzoni, R., Bauer, J., Van Gossum, A., Klek, S., Muscaritoli, M., Nyulasi, I. +4 more·2015·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To provide a consensus-based minimum set of criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition to be applied independent of clinical setting and aetiology, and to unify international terminology.Method The European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) appointed a group of clinical scientists to perform a modified Delphi process, encompassing e-mail communications, face-to-face meetings, in group questionnaires and ballots, as well as a ballot for the ESPEN membership.Result First, ESPEN recommends that subjects at risk of malnutrition are identified by validated screening tools, and should be assessed and treated accordingly. Risk of malnutrition should have its own ICD Code. Second, a unanimous consensus was reached to advocate two options for the diagnosis of malnutrition. Option one requires body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) <18.5 to define malnutrition. Option two requires the combined finding of unintentional weight loss (mandatory) and at least one of either reduced BMI or a low fat free mass index (FFMI). Weight loss could be either >10% of habitual weight indefinite of time, or >5% over 3 months. Reduced BMI is <20 or <22 kg/m(2) in subjects younger and older than 70 years, respectively. Low FFMI is <15 and <17 kg/m(2) in females and males, respectively. About 12% of ESPEN members participated in a ballot; >75% agreed; i.e. indicated ≥7 on a 10-graded scale of acceptance, to this definition.Conclusion In individuals identified by screening as at risk of malnutrition, the diagnosis of malnutrition should be based on either a low BMI (<18.5 kg/m(2)), or on the combined finding of weight loss together with either reduced BMI (age-specific) or a low FFMI using sex-specific cut-offs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.03.001

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with chronic diseases and hypoalbuminemia lose fat-free mass despite adequate food intake.

    “Further, patients with chronic diseases and hypoalbuminemia lose fat‐free mass, considered to be an essential indicator of the undernourished state, despite adequate food intake.2, 3”

    From Hypoalbuminemia: Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance (2019) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Introduction links malnutrition to decreased fat-free mass, and §3.3 describes inflammation as a cause of catabolism and reduced albumin levels. But the paper does not say that patients with chronic disease and hypoalbuminemia lose fat-free mass despite adequate food intake; it also cautions in §3.3 that albumin is not sufficiently specific for diagnosing malnutrition. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ESPEN appointed an international expert group in 2015 to reach consensus on generally applicable diagnostic criteria for malnutrition, independent of etiologic mechanisms and applicable to patients from all clinical settings.

    “In 2015 (Figure 1), ESPEN appointed an international expert group to reach a consensus on a set of generally applicable diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition, independent of etiologic mechanisms and applicable to patients from all clinical settings (14).”

    From Evolution of the diagnosis of malnutrition in adults: a primer for clinicians (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction and §1.1 say ESPEN appointed a consensus group to develop generally applicable malnutrition criteria independent of etiology and usable for all patients in all clinical settings. Section 2.1 describes the group as international, but places the initiative’s launch in late 2012 and its outline in January 2013; it does not support the claim that ESPEN appointed the group in 2015. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite global attempts to define malnutrition, such as consensus statements issued by ASPEN/AND and ESPEN, there is still no single unambiguous, objective, universally acknowledged consensus definition.

    “Despite global attempts to define malnutrition, such as consensus statements issued by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN)/The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND) (13), the European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) (14), we still lack a single unambiguous, objective, universally acknowledged consensus definition.”
  • The ESPEN consensus provided numerical cut-offs for each indicator, enabling uniform diagnosis across clinical settings.

    “Importantly, the consensus provided numerical cut-offs for each indicator, enabling uniform diagnosis across clinical settings.”
  • ESPEN provides two alternatives for malnutrition diagnosis: diagnosis solely based on BMI, or unintentional weight loss together with either reduced BMI or low FFMI using sex-specific cut-offs.

    “The group furthermore provides two alternatives for the diagnosis of malnutrition based on the use of these variables: (1) diagnosis solely based on a BMI, or (2) the combined finding of unintentional weight loss together with either reduced BMI or a low FFMI using sex-specific cut-offs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cederholm, T., Bosaeus, I., Barazzoni, R., Bauer, J., Van Gossum, A., Klek, S., Muscaritoli, M., Nyulasi, I., Ockenga, J., Schneider, S. M., de van der Schueren, M. A. E., & Singer, P.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Klinikum Bremen-Mitte (DE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Cederholm, T.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
335-340
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083797416
Cited by
1,755
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 112 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 166 · 2023: 170 · 2022: 215 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 194 · 2019: 158 · 2018: 152 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 15
FWCI
93.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
malnutrition, diagnostic criteria, body mass index, unintentional weight loss, fat-free mass index, malnutrition screening
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Body Composition, Delphi Technique, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Societies, Scientific, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Consensus, Malnutrition, Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review