Cited by 58Health disparities and outcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Undesirable social relations as risk factors for loneliness among 14-year-olds in the UK: Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study

Open access
Yang, Keming, Petersen, Kimberly J., Qualter, Pamela·2022·International Journal of Behavioral Development

Abstract

In the current study, data collected from Wave 6 of the Millennium Cohort Study ( n = 11,872), a nationally representative sample survey of youth aged 14 years in the UK, are used to examine the prevalence of loneliness among this age-group, investigate the feelings associated with the experience of loneliness among youth, explore the risk factors for loneliness among young people, and learn how they coped with loneliness. Given recent findings that youth are vulnerable to loneliness, the study assesses the prevalence of loneliness among adolescents across some important sociodemographic characteristics, such as nation of residence, gender, and ethnicity. We also identify the kinds of social experiences that accompany loneliness during adolescence, exploring friendship, relations with parents, social support, and bullying. Our key finding is that, in addition to the absence of desired social relationships, which has been typically identified as the ultimate source of loneliness, the presence of undesirable and even harmful social relationships is a major source of loneliness. This study uniquely brings together psychological and sociological perspectives to understand the experience of youth loneliness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0165025420965737

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-sectional studies indicated that poor physical or psychological health, low economic status, poor friendship quality, bad relationships in family, being bullied, and lack of social and emotional support were linked to more severe loneliness among adolescents.

    “Cross-sectional studies indicated that poor physical or psychological health, low economic status, poor friendship quality, bad relationships in family, being bullied, and lack of social and emotional support were linked to more severe loneliness among adolescents.”

    From A Longitudinal Study of Loneliness Before the End of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trajectories, Predictors, and Impact on Chinese Adolescent Mental Health (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results section (‘Exploring Negative Feelings and Social Relationships as Potential Risk Factors for Loneliness’; page unavailable) links loneliness among UK 14-year-olds to negative feelings, arguments with parents, having no close friend, and bullying. The social-support correlations in Table 5 (page unavailable) also support the lack-of-support component. The paper does not establish the claimed links with poor physical health or low economic status, and it measures whether adolescents have a close friend rather than friendship quality. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior studies have shown an association between bullying victimization during adolescence and loneliness in adolescence or young adulthood.

    “Previous studies have shown an association between bullying victimization during adolescence and loneliness in adolescence [14] or young adulthood [19, 20].”
  • The single-item measure of loneliness has been used in other large-scale studies and was shown to capture the context of social relationships.

    “Furthermore, it has been used in other large-scale studies [14, 30] and was shown to capture the context of social relationships [14].”
  • A study from the UK using the same single-item measurement reported the prevalence of loneliness to be 34% among 14-year-olds, higher than the figure in this study (12% in the age 14 survey).

    “A study from the UK using the same single-item measurement reported the prevalence of loneliness to be 34% among 14-year-olds, higher than the figure in our study (12% in the age 14 survey) [14].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Brennan, T., & Auslander, N. (1979). Adolescent loneliness: An exploratory study of social and psychological predispositions and theory (Vol. 1). National Institute of Mental Health, Juvenile Prob- lems Division.
  2. Cutrona, C. E. (1982). Transition to college: Loneliness and the process of social adjustment. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Lone- liness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 291-309). Wiley.
  3. Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224-237). Wiley.
  4. Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships: Personal relationships in disorder (pp. 31-56). Academic Press.
  5. Rook, K. S., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Perspectives on helping the lonely. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 351-378). Wiley.
  6. Rubenstein, C. M., & Shaver, P. (1982). The experience of loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 206-223). Wiley.
  7. Sermat, V. (1980). Some situational and personality correlates of lone- liness. In J. Hartog, J. R. Audy, & Y. A. Cohen (Eds.), The anatomy of loneliness (pp. 305-318). International Universities Press.
  8. University of London, Institute of Education, Centre for Longitudinal Studies. (2018). Millennium Cohort Study: Sixth survey, 2015 [data collection]. 4th ed (UK Data Service. SN: 8156). http://doi.org/10. 5255/UKDA-SN-8156-4 · DOI
  9. Weiss, R. S. (1982). Issues in the study of loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp.71-79). Wiley.
  10. Young, J. (1982). Loneliness, depression and cognitive therapy: Theory and application. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 379-405). Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, K., Petersen, K. J., & Qualter, P.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Yang, Keming
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Development
Published
2020-10-20
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
3-9
ISSN
  • 0165-0254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0651
OpenAlex
W3093591070
Cited by
58
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
loneliness, adolescents, risk factors, bullying, friendship, parent-child relationship, social support, coping with loneliness, sociodemographic differences, gender differences, ethnicity, Millennium Cohort Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review