Cited by 53Coffee research and impactsSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Sleep is more sensitive to high doses of caffeine in the middle years of life

Robillard, Rébecca, Bouchard, Maude, Cartier, Annick, Nicolau, Laurence, Carrier, Julie·2015·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

During the middle years of life, sleep becomes more fragile and its sensitivity to psychostimulants may increase. This study evaluated the effects of 200 mg and 400 mg of caffeine on sleep in young and middle-aged adults. The sleep of 22 young (23.5 ± 1.9 years) and 24 middle-aged (51.7 ± 11.5 years) adults was recorded using polysomnography in two conditions (placebo and caffeine) in a double-blind cross-over design. Compared to placebo, caffeine increased sleep latency, shortened total sleep duration and reduced sleep efficiency. At the higher dose, these effects were more pronounced in middle-aged than in young adults. Furthermore, the higher dose of caffeine increased absolute stage 1 sleep in young adults, whereas it decreased absolute stage 2 sleep in middle-aged adults. Caffeine also induced dose-dependent increases in relative stage 1 sleep and reductions in absolute and relative slow wave sleep and absolute rapid eye movement sleep in both age groups. There was no dose- or age-related modulation of the effects of caffeine on quantified electroencephalographic measures. These results indicate that, compared to young adults, middle-aged adults are generally more sensitive to the effects of a high dose of caffeine on sleep quantity and quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881115575535

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dose-dependent reductions in the duration of N3 sleep and REM sleep were identified, with greater reductions occurring at larger caffeine doses.

    “Dosedependent reductions in the duration of N3 sleep [35,41] and REM sleep [41] were identi fi ed, with greater reductions occurring at larger doses.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robillard, R., Bouchard, M., Cartier, A., Nicolau, L., & Carrier, J.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA)
  • Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2015-03-10
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
688-697
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2089552283
Cited by
53
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
caffeine, sleep, middle age (human life stage), age differences, dose-response relationship, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, slow-wave sleep, REM sleep, stage 1 sleep, stage 2 sleep, psychostimulants, sleep quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Caffeine, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sleep, REM, Wakefulness, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review