Cited by 68Management and Marketing EducationMobile Learning in EducationPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

An Introduction to Multitasking and Texting: Prevalence and Impact on Grades and GPA in Marketing Classes

Clayson, Dennis E., Haley, Debra A.·2013·Journal of Marketing Education

Abstract

This exploratory study looks at the phenomena of texting in a marketing education context. It outlines the difficulties of multitasking within two metacognitive models of learning and sets the stage for further research on the effects of texting within class. Students in marketing classes in two different universities were surveyed. They received an average of 37 texts per day and initiated about 16. More than 90% of the respondents reported receiving texts while in class and 86% reported texting someone from class. Even though students believed they could follow a lecture and text at the same time, respondents who did text within marketing classes received lower grades. Contrary to other research, texting frequency was generally unrelated to GPA. Implications for both pedagogical issues and research in marketing education are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0273475312467339

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clayson and Haley (2012) reported that 68% of students believed they could attend to a lecture and text at the same time, yet students who texted received lower grades.

    “Clayson and Haley (2012) reported that 68% of students believed they could attend to a lecture and text at the same time, yet students who texted received lower grades.”
  • Three of 11 correlational studies found no relationship between media use during academic activities and overall grades or test scores.

    “Three of 11 studies found no relationship (Clayson & Haley, 2013; Karpinski, Kirschner, Ozer, Mellott, & Ochwo, 2012 1 ; Wei, Wang, & Klausner, 2012),”

    From The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review (2015) · cites this paper as Clayson & Haley, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Northern Iowa (US)
  • Southeastern Oklahoma University, Durant, OK, USA
Venue
Journal of Marketing Education
Published
2012-12-06
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
26-40
ISSN
  • 0273-4753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6550
OpenAlex
W2143736274
Cited by
68
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
FWCI
10.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing Education (publishedVersion)
  • UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Management and Marketing Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
text messaging, multitasking, marketing education, student grades, GPA, mobile phones in the classroom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review