Cited by 81Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

The Efficacy of 2 Different Dosages of Methylphenidate in Treating Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Open access
Bouffard, Rachelle, Hechtman, Lily, Minde, Klaus, Iaboni-Kassab, Fiorella·2003·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of methylphenidate in treating adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), using subjective (self-report) and objective (computerized test) measures. Method: This double-blind crossover trial of placebo vs methylphenidate included subjects with childhood and current ADHD symptoms, IQs above 80, no other psychiatric condition explaining their difficulties or requiring other treatment, and no substance abuse in the previous 6 months. We administered 10 mg 3 times daily of medication (that is, placebo or methylphenidate) for 2 weeks. On the final day, subjects completed self-report measures and were tested on computerized tests. We then increased dosage to 15 mg 3 times daily for 2 weeks and administered a complete reassessment on the final day. Following a 1-week washout, we repeated this process on the second medication (that is, placebo or methylphenidate). Results: Thirty adults with ADHD participated. Self-report measures and computerized tests showed significant improvements in ADHD symptoms on methylphenidate, compared with placebo. Other psychiatric symptoms (notably, anxiety and depression) were alleviated with methylphenidate. There was no significant difference between the 2 dosages of methylphenidate. Conclusion: Methylphenidate is effective in improving ADHD symptoms in adults with ADHD, is well tolerated, and has minimal side effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/070674370304800806

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Side-effects of stimulants are usually mild and transitory, mainly consisting of headache, reduced appetite, palpitations, nervousness, difficulty falling asleep, and dry mouth.

    “Side-effects are usually mild and transitory, mainly consisting of headache, reduced appetite, palpitations, nervousness, difficulty falling asleep, and dry mouth [148,269,270].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Gittelman R, Mannuzza S, Shenker R, Bonagura N. Hyperactive boys almost grown up. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:937-47.
  2. Mannuzza S, Klein RG, Bessler A, Malloy P, LaPadula M. Adult outcome of hyperactive boys. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993;50:56 -76.
  3. Wender PH, Reimherr FW, Wood DR. Attention deficit disorder ('minimal brain dysfunction') in adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:449-56.
  4. Barkley RA. Adult ADHD Problem Behaviours Scale. University of Massachu- setts Medical Center. New York: Guilford Press; 1991.
  5. Wilkinson L. SYSTAT 6.1. Chicago (IL): SPSS Inc; 1996. Manuscript received August 2002, revised, and accepted December 2002. Previously presented as a poster at the Canadian Academy of Child Psychia- try; September 1996; Quebec (QC). Previously presented as a poster at the American Academy of Child Psychiatry; October 1996; Philadelphia (PA). Previously presented as a paper at the 11th annual conference of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists; October 1998; Sydney (NSW).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouffard, R., Hechtman, L., Minde, K., & Iaboni-Kassab, F.
Affiliations
  • Island Health (CA)
  • Montreal Children's Hospital (CA)
  • School Psychologist, North Clackamas School District, Portland, Oregon
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2003-09
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
546-554
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2137870656
Cited by
81
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
McGill University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
methylphenidate, adult ADHD, dose comparison, computerized cognitive assessment, anxiety and depression, tolerability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review