Cited by 59Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionIntimate Partner and Family Violence

Individual- and Relationship-Level Factors Related to Better Mental Health Outcomes following Child Abuse: Results from a Nationally Representative Canadian Sample

Open access
Afifi, Tracie O., MacMillan, Harriet L., Taillieu, Tamara, Turner, Sarah, Cheung, Kristene, Sareen, Jitender, Boyle, Michael H.·2016·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Child abuse can have devastating mental health consequences. Fortunately, not all individuals exposed to child abuse will suffer from poor mental health. Understanding what factors are related to good mental health following child abuse can provide evidence to inform prevention of impairment. Our objectives were to 1) describe the prevalence of good, moderate, and poor mental health among respondents with and without a child abuse history; 2) examine the relationships between child abuse and good, moderate, and poor mental health outcomes; 3) examine the relationships between individual- and relationship-level factors and better mental health outcomes; and 4) determine if individual- and relationship-level factors moderate the relationship between child abuse and mental health. Method: Data were from the nationally representative 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey: Mental Health ( n = 23,395; household response rate = 79.8%; 18 years and older). Good, moderate, and poor mental health was assessed using current functioning and well-being, past-year mental disorders, and past-year suicidal ideation. Results: Only 56.3% of respondents with a child abuse history report good mental health compared to 72.4% of those without a child abuse history. Individual- and relationship-level factors associated with better mental health included higher education and income, physical activity, good coping skills to handle problems and daily demands, and supportive relationships that foster attachment, guidance, reliable alliance, social integration, and reassurance of worth. Conclusions: This study identifies several individual- and relationship-level factors that could be targeted for intervention strategies aimed at improving mental health outcomes following child abuse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0706743716651832

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between married/common-law relationships and mental health in the general population is well established.

    “The association between married/common-law relationships and mental health in the general population is well established59,67”
  • Positive and supportive relationships can be expected to serve as resiliency factors for mental health.

    “Positive and supportive relationships can be expected to serve as resiliency factors for mental health.67”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [50]Lamers SMA Glas CAW Westerhof GJ Bohlmeijer ET Longitudinal evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC-SF). Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012; 28(4): 290– 296.
  2. [54]Cutrona CE Russell D Cultrona C Daniel R The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Adv Pers Relations. 1987; 1(1): 37– 67.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Afifi, T. O., MacMillan, H. L., Taillieu, T., Turner, S., Cheung, K., Sareen, J., & Boyle, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Afifi, Tracie O.
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-07-09
Volume
61
Issue
12
Pages
776-788
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2417029267
Cited by
59
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
child abuse, mental health outcomes, resilience, supportive relationships, coping strategies, social integration, attachment, education and income, physical activity, suicidal ideation, mental illness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Canada, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review