Cited by 496Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice

Open access
Jiang, Yong-hui, Ehlers, Michael D.·2013·Neuron

Abstract

Shank family proteins (Shank1, Shank2, and Shank3) are synaptic scaffolding proteins that organize an extensive protein complex at the postsynaptic density (PSD) of excitatory glutamatergic synapses. Recent human genetic studies indicate that SHANK family genes (SHANK1, SHANK2, and SHANK3) are causative genes for idiopathic autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Neurobiological studies of Shank mutations in mice support a general hypothesis of synaptic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of ASD. However, the molecular diversity of SHANK family gene products, as well as the heterogeneity in human and mouse phenotypes, pose challenges to modeling human SHANK mutations. Here, we review the molecular genetics of SHANK mutations in human ASD and discuss recent findings where such mutations have been modeled in mice. Conserved features of synaptic dysfunction and corresponding behaviors in Shank mouse mutants may help dissect the pathophysiology of ASD, but also highlight divergent phenotypes that arise from different mutations in the same gene.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.016

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 259 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Mouse Shank2a exons 6 and 7 correspond to exons 16 and 17 of predicted full-length mouse Shank2 based on rat cDNA.

    “Using the longest rat cDNA of Shank2 deposited in GenBank (NM_201350) as a reference, one can deduce that exons 6 and 7 in mouse Shank2a isoform correspond to exons 16 and 17 of predicted full length mouse Shank2 deduced from rat cDNA (NM_201350)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NM_201350

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The rat Shank2 cDNA reference accurately predicts the exon numbering of full-length mouse Shank2.
  • Interpretationreasoning

    The molecular diversity of SHANK gene products and the heterogeneity of human and mouse phenotypes make it difficult to model human SHANK mutations.

    “However, the molecular diversity of SHANK family gene products, as well as the heterogeneity in human and mouse phenotypes, pose challenges to modeling human SHANK mutations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Little is known about the underlying pathophysiology or neurological basis of ASD.

    “Remarkably little is known about the underlying pathophysiology or neurological basis of ASD (Amaral et al., 2008; Courchesne et al., 2007; Geschwind and Levitt, 2007; Rubenstein, 2010; Zoghbi, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Amaral et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Courchesne et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Geschwind and Levitt, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Shank1, Shank2, and Shank3 are synaptic scaffolding proteins that assemble a large protein complex at the postsynaptic density of excitatory glutamatergic synapses.

    “Shank family proteins (Shank1, Shank2, and Shank3) are synaptic scaffolding proteins that organize an extensive protein complex at the postsynaptic density (PSD) of excitatory glutamatergic synapses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Grabrucker et al., 2011b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gundelfinger et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kreienkamp, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Human genetic studies indicate that SHANK1, SHANK2, and SHANK3 are causative genes for idiopathic autism spectrum disorders.

    “Recent human genetic studies indicate that SHANK family genes (SHANK1, SHANK2, and SHANK3) are causative genes for idiopathic autism spectrum disorders (ASD).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Berkel et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Berkel et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Durand et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 69
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Conserved synaptic dysfunction and related behaviors in Shank mouse mutants may help dissect ASD pathophysiology, but they also reveal divergent phenotypes caused by different mutations in the same gene.

    “Conserved features of synaptic dysfunction and corresponding behaviors in Shank mouse mutants may help dissect the pathophysiology of ASD, but also highlight divergent phenotypes that arise from different mutations in the same gene.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Genetic risk contributes significantly to idiopathic ASD, but the specific genetic alterations remain unknown in most cases.

    “Genetic risk contributes significantly to idiopathic ASD, but the specific genetic alterations remain elusive in the majority of cases (Abrahams and Geschwind, 2008; Folstein and Rosen-Sheidley, 2001; State, 2010b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Abrahams and Geschwind, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Folstein and Rosen-Sheidley, 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites State, 2010b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Diagnostic evaluations for ASD were not conducted in most cases or were carried out using different evaluation protocols.

    “Diagnostic evaluations for ASD were not conducted in the majority of cases or were carried out using different evaluation protocols.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The available data strongly support the conclusion that molecular defects of SHANK3 can cause ASD but with variable presentations.

    “Together, these data strongly support a conclusion that molecular defects of SHANK3 can cause ASD but with variable presentations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many missense mutations have been identified in SHANK3, but their clinical relevance has not been determined.

    “Many missense mutations have been identified in SHANK3 (Gauthier et al., 2009; Moessner et al., 2007; Schaaf et al., 2011), but their clinical relevance has not been determined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gauthier et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Moessner et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schaaf et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Genes implicated in metachromatic leukodystrophy (ARSA), congenital disorders of glycosylation (ALG12), and spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (ATXN10) map within the 22q13.3 region.

    “For example, genes implicated in metachromatic leukodystrophy (ARSA), congenital disorders of glycosylation (ALG12), and spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (ATXN10) are mapped within the 22q13.3 region.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The quality of clinical data in the reports varies and is often incomplete, so direct comparisons should be made cautiously.

    “Importantly, the quality of clinical data varies and is often incomplete in these reports and thus direct comparisons should be made with caution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Point mutations of SHANK2 and microdeletions of SHANK1 and SHANK2 have been found in patients with ASD and intellectual disability.

    “More recently, point mutations of SHANK2 and microdeletions of SHANK1 and SHANK2 have been found in patients with ASD and intellectual disability (Figures 1B and 1C) (Berkel et al., 2010; Leblond et al., 2012; O’Roak et al., 2012b; Pinto et al., 2010; Sato et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Berkel et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Leblond et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites O’Roak et al., 2012b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The key clinical features of PMS are global developmental delay, hypotonia, absent or severely delayed language, autistic behaviors, and intellectual disability.

    “The key clinical features associated with PMS are global developmental delay, hypotonia, absent or severely delayed language, autistic behaviors, and intellectual disability (Phelan, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Phelan, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Similar copy number variants are found across many genomic loci in both ASD and schizophrenia.

    “This observation is consistent with recent reports that similar copy number variants (CNVs) are found across many genomic loci in both ASD and schizophrenia (Cook and Scherer, 2008; Gejman et al., 2011; Moreno-De-Luca et al., 2010; Sanders et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cook and Scherer, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gejman et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Moreno-De-Luca et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Compared with SHANK3, the number of cases with SHANK2 mutations is small but convincing.

    “Compared to SHANK3, the number of cases with SHANK2 mutations is small but convincing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because the number of ASD cases with two genetic hits including SHANK2 is small, the validity of the multiple hit model remains to be tested in additional cohorts or functional studies.

    “Because the number of ASD cases with two genetic hits including SHANK2 is small, the validity of the model remains to be tested in additional patient cohorts or by functional studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SHANK3 mutations were the first and remain the best characterized SHANK mutations in human ASD.

    “Mutations of SHANK3 were the first (Durand et al., 2007) and remain the best characterized SHANK mutations in human ASD (Boccuto et al., 2012; Moessner et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Durand et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Boccuto et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Moessner et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Homer family members regulate diverse synaptic functions.

    “Among the various Shank binding proteins, Homer family members have been shown to regulate diverse synaptic functions (Hayashi et al., 2009; Sala et al., 2001; Tu et al., 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hayashi et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sala et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tu et al., 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    When overexpressed in cultured mouse neurons, Shanks recruit GluA1 AMPA receptors and increase formation of new synapses.

    “When overexpressed in cultured neurons from mice, Shanks recruit GluA1 AMPA receptors and increases the formation of new synapses (Roussignol et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roussignol et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shank3 forms multimers via its C-terminal SAM domain and its PDZ domain.

    “Shank3 forms multimers via its C terminal SAM domain (Boeckers et al., 2005; Hayashi et al., 2009; Naisbitt et al., 1999) as well as its PDZ domain (Iskenderian-Epps and Imperiali, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Boeckers et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hayashi et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Naisbitt et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In cultured rat neurons, knockdown of Shank3 selectively reduces synaptic mGluR5 receptors and impairs mGluR5-dependent signaling and plasticity.

    “In cultured rat neurons, knock-down of Shank3 selectively reduces synaptic mGluR5 receptor and impairs mGluR5-dependent signaling and plasticity (Verpelli et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Verpelli et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Shank/ProSAP family members, including Shank3, have five conserved protein domains: ANK, SH3, PDZ, a proline-rich region with homer- and cortactin-binding sites, and SAM.

    “Shank/ProSAP family members including Shank3 have five conserved protein domains – an ankyrin repeat domain (ANK), Src homology 3 (SH3) domain, PSD-95/Discs large/ZO-1 (PDZ) domain, a proline-rich region containing homer- and cortactin-binding sites, and a sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain (Figure 2A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The SAM domain of Shank3 has a Zn2+ binding site important for Shank3 protein folding at the PSD and for synaptogenesis and synapse maturation in vitro.

    “The SAM domain of Shank3 has a Zn2+ binding site that is important for Shank3 protein folding at the PSD as well as for synaptogenesis and synapse maturation in vitro (Baron et al., 2006; Grabrucker et al., 2011a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baron et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Grabrucker et al., 2011a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Different SHANK mutations may act through different mechanisms to alter protein-protein interactions at the postsynaptic density and cause synaptic dysfunction that may underlie clinical presentations.

    “Different SHANK mutations may thus act through different mechanisms to alter protein-protein interactions at the PSD and cause synaptic dysfunction that may underlie clinical presentations of disorder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Shank3 shares a very similar protein domain structure with Shank1, suggesting that Shank3 participates in a similar protein network with Homer1.

    “Shank3 shares very similar protein domain structure to Shank1, suggesting that Shank3 participates in a similar protein network with Homer1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mutation in the cortactin binding site of Shank3 results in longer spines with reduced spine head area.

    “In contrast, mutation in the cortactin binding site results in longer spines with reduced spine head area (Roussignol et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roussignol et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Excessive mGluR5 signaling has been implicated in fragile X syndrome, which has clinical overlap with 22q13.3 deletions.

    “although excessive mGluR5 signaling has been implicated in fragile X syndrome (Krueger and Bear, 2011), which has clinical overlap with 22q13.3 deletions (Phelan, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Krueger and Bear, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Phelan, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shank3 shares a similar protein domain structure but has a different expression pattern and subcellular localization than Shank1 and Shank2.

    “Shank3 shares a similar protein domain structure but has a different expression pattern and subcellular localization than Shank1 and Shank2 (Bockers et al., 2004; Peca et al., 2011; Tao-Cheng et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bockers et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peca et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tao-Cheng et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The large protein complex organized by Shanks performs functions at the postsynaptic membrane including actin-based cytoskeletal remodeling, synapse formation, AMPA receptor endocytosis, and regulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity.

    “The large protein complex organized by Shanks performs a variety of functions at the postsynaptic membrane including actin-based cytoskeletal remodeling, synapse formation, AMPA receptor endocytosis, and regulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Shank family proteins are ubiquitinated in an activity-dependent manner in neurons.

    “Biochemically, Shank family proteins are ubiquitinated in an activity-dependent manner in neurons (Ehlers, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ehlers, 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mutation of the PDZ domain of Shank3 reduces dendritic spine formation, while mutation of ANK-SH3 domains leads to spines with normal length but reduced spine head area.

    “For example, mutation of the PDZ domain of Shank3 results in a reduction in dendritic spine formation while mutation of ANK-SH3 domains leads to spines with normal length but reduced spine head area.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roussignol et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Expression of Shank3 isoforms is cell type-specific and developmentally regulated.

    “The expression of Shank3 isoforms is cell type-specific and developmentally regulated (Lim et al., 1999; Maunakea et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lim et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Maunakea et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many known ASD genes, such as neuroligins and neurexins, display complex isoform-specific expression in brain, with different isoforms having distinct functions.

    “Consistent with this notion, many known ASD genes, such as neuroligins and neurexins, display a complex pattern of isoform-specific expression in brain (Boucard et al., 2005; Sudhof, 2008), with different isoforms having very distinct functions (Chih et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Boucard et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sudhof, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chih et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Homer1 and Shank1 form a mesh-like matrix thought to function as an organizing lattice for PSD proteins.

    “Homer1 and Shank1 form a mesh-like matrix that is thought to function as an organizing lattice for PSD proteins (Hayashi et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hayashi et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The intron 19 splicing mutation will disrupt most SHANK3 isoforms but leave SHANK3f and other short isoforms intact.

    “The intron 19 splicing mutation will disrupt most isoforms but leave SHANK3f and other short isoforms intact.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Alternative splicing of exons 19-20 and isoforms of SHANK2E, SHANK2A, and SHANK2B are conserved in mice, but the status of SHANK2C and other spliced exons has not been confirmed.

    “The alternative splicing of exons 19-20 and isoforms of SHANK2E (Jiang, unpublished data), SHANK2A, and SHANK2B (Lim et al., 1999) were conserved in mice but the status of SHANK2C and other spliced exons has not been confirmed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lim et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Smaller dendritic spines were observed, but the ultrastructure of the PSD is unaffected at CA1 synapses of Shank1−/− mice.

    “Smaller dendritic spines were observed, but the ultrastructure of the PSD is unaffected at CA1 synapses of Shank1−/− mice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hung et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Deletion of Shank2a exon 7 or exons 6-7 causes a frame shift immediately after exon 7.

    “The deletion of exon 7 and exon 6-7 of Shank2a (exons 17 and exons 16-17 of predicted full length Shank2) resulted in a frame shift of the open reading frame immediately after exon 7.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    mEPSCs from CA1 hippocampal neurons are unaltered in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice but reduced in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.

    “mEPSCs recorded from CA1 hippocampal neurons were unaltered in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice, but reduced in Shank2 Δex7−/−.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Won et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Analyses of Shank2 Δex7 and Δex6-7 mice show similarities and significant differences in protein composition, synaptic development/function, and behavior.

    “Analyses of protein composition, synaptic development and function, and behaviors have revealed similarity but also significant differences between these two lines of Shank2 mutant mice”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Spatial learning and memory is impaired in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice but normal in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.

    “Spatial learning and memory was impaired in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− but normal in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Won et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The NMDA/AMPA current ratio is reduced at CA1 synapses in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice but increased at the same synapses in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.

    “Interestingly, the ratio of NMDA/AMPA currents was reduced at CA1 synapses in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice but increased at the same synapses of Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Won et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because the transcript structure has not been fully worked out, the possibility that the Shank1 mutant is not a complete knockout cannot be ruled out.

    “Because the transcript structure has not been fully worked out, the possibility that this is not a complete Shank1 knockout cannot be ruled out.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Shank2 Δex7−/− mice, GluN1 and GluN2B NMDA receptors are increased in hippocampus, and GluN1, GluN2A, and GluA1 are increased in striatum.

    “In Shank2 Δex7−/− mice, GluN1 and GluN2B NMDA-type glutamate receptors in hippocampus and GluN1, GluN2A, and GluA1 in striatum are increased (Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    NMDA receptor-dependent LTP in hippocampal CA1 synapses is increased and LTD is unaffected in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.

    “NMDA receptor-dependent LTP in hippocampal CA1 synapses was increased and LTD was unaffected in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Baseline synaptic transmission is reduced in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice, while normal synaptic transmission is observed in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice.

    “Whereas baseline synaptic transmission was reduced in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice (Schmeisser et al., 2012), normal synaptic transmission was observed in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice (Won et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Won et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SHANK3 has five CpG islands across the gene, and these islands display brain-specific and cell type-specific DNA methylation.

    “To add further complexity, SHANK3 has five CpG islands across the gene and these CpG islands display brain-specific and cell type-specific DNA methylation (Figure 1A) (Beri et al., 2007; Ching et al., 2005; Maunakea et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beri et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ching et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Maunakea et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Basal synaptic transmission was reduced, but LTP and LTD in CA1 hippocampus were unaffected in Shank1−/− mice.

    “Basal synaptic transmission was reduced but long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) in CA1 hippocampus were unaffected (Hung et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hung et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    SHANK2E is also expressed in brain tissues in humans.

    “However, a recent report indicates that SHANK2E is also expressed in brain tissues in humans (Leblond et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leblond et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    D-cycloserine restored the NMDA/AMPA ratio and improved social interaction in the three-chamber assay in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice.

    “Interestingly, treatment with D-cycloserine, a NMDA receptor agonist, restored the NMDA/AMPA ratio and improved social interaction in the three-chamber social interaction assay in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice (Won et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Won et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both Shank2 Δex6-7−/− and Δex7−/− mice show hyperactivity, impaired social interaction, altered ultrasonic vocalizations, and increased self-grooming.

    “Behaviorally, hyperactivity, impaired social interaction, altered ultrasonic vocalizations, and increased self-grooming were observed in both Shank2 Δex6-7−/− and Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Won et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Behavioral analyses revealed subtle impairments in social interaction and communication as well as increased repetitive behaviors in Shank1 mutant mice.

    “Behavioral analyses revealed subtle impairments in social interaction and communication as well as increased repetitive behaviors (Silverman et al., 2011; Wohr et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Silverman et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wohr et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both NMDA receptor-dependent LTP and LTD at CA1 synapses are reduced in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice.

    “In contrast, both NMDA receptor-dependent LTP and LTD at CA1 synapses were reduced in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Won et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shank1 mutant mice with a deletion of exons 14-15 encoding the PDZ domain were first reported in 2007, and more extensive behavioral analyses were conducted subsequently.

    “Shank1 mutant mice with a deletion of exons 14-15 encoding the PDZ domain were first reported in 2007 (Hung et al., 2008) (Figure 3C) and more extensive behavioral analyses were conducted subsequently (Silverman et al., 2011; Wohr et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hung et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Silverman et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wohr et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    CDPPB rescued the reduced NMDA/AMPA ratio, recovered defective LTP and LTD, reversed biochemical changes, and reversed impaired social interaction without affecting other behavioral impairments in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice.

    “In addition, treatment with CDPPB, an mGluR5-selective positive allosteric modulator, not only rescued the reduced NMDA/AMPA ratio but also recovered the defective LTP and LTD in hippocampus as well as biochemical changes in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice.”
    • Also stated in: § Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice · plain
      “CDPPB also reversed the impaired social interaction impairment in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice without affecting other behavioral impairments in these mice (Won et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Won et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Overall, data support that synaptic function is impaired and social behaviors are abnormal in mice with Shank3 mutations.

    “Overall, the data obtained from these studies support a general conclusion that synaptic function is impaired and social behaviors are abnormal in mice with Shank3 mutations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GluN2A and GluN2B are unchanged in striatum of Δex11−/− mice.

    “but they were unchanged in the stratum of Δex11−/− mice (Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    mRNAs joining exons 2-10 and 3-10 are stable and predicted to cause a frame shift shortly after exon 10.

    “The mRNAs with joining of exons 2-10 and exons 3-10 were stable and were predicted to result in a frame shift in protein sequence shortly after exon 10.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Δex11 mutation is predicted to disrupt promoters 1 to 3 for Shank3a-c but not promoters 4 to 6 for Shank3d-f.

    “The Δex11 mutation (Schmeisser et al., 2012) is predicted to disrupt promoters 1 to 3 for Shank3a-c but not promoters 4 to 6 for Shank3d-f”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such variation may be due to isoform-specific effects of different mutations.

    “Such variation may be due to isoform-specific effects of different mutations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Different brain regions including hippocampus, striatum, and neocortex were analyzed in different lines of mutant mice.

    “Different brain regions including hippocampus, striatum, and neocortex were analyzed in different lines of mutant mice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All these Shank3 deletions cause a frame shift in targeted transcripts, leading to truncated protein or disruption of full-length RNA/protein isoforms.

    “Because all these deletions cause a frame shift for targeted transcripts, they all resulted in either a truncated Shank3 protein or possible disruption of full length RNA or protein isoforms due to the stability of encoded mRNA or protein.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PSD thickness and length are not decreased in hippocampal CA1 synapses of ex4-9J−/− mice or Δex11−/− mice.

    “but not in the hippocampal CA1 synapses in ex4-9J−/− mice (Wang et al., 2011) or Δex11−/− mice (Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Spine density is decreased in striatum of Δex13-16−/− mice and in CA1 hippocampus of Δex4-9J−/− mice.

    “spine density was decreased in the striatum and CA1 hippocampus of Δex13-16−/− and Δex4-9J−/− mice, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Peca et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The methods and techniques used in these analyses were similar but not identical.

    “The methods and techniques used in these analyses were similar but not identical.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The reported Shank3 mutations include deletions of exons 4-9 (two designs), 4-7, 11, and 13-16.

    “The mutations in these mice include deletions of exons 4-9 by two groups with slightly different design [(Δex4-9Buxbaum(B)) (Bozdagi et al., 2010) and Δex4-9Jiang (J) (Wang et al., 2011)], deletion of exons 4-7(Δex4-7) (Peca et al., 2011) encoding the ANK repeat domain, deletion of exon 11(Δex11) encoding the SH3 domain (Schmeisser et al., 2012), and deletion of exons 13-16 (Δex13-16) encoding the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bozdagi et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peca et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In general, Shank3 mutation leads to loss of spines, reduced spine volume, and decreased PSD thickness in adult.

    “In general, mutation of Shank3 leads to loss of spines, a reduction in spine volume, and decreased PSD thickness in the adult.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Synaptic transmission is reduced at hippocampal CA1 synapses of Δex4-9B+/− and Δex4-9B−/− mice, but not in Δex4-9J−/− or Δex13-16−/− mice.

    “synaptic transmission is reduced at hippocampal CA1 synapses of Δex4-9B+/− (Bozdagi et al., 2010) and Δex4-9B−/− (Yang et al., 2012), but not in Δex4-9J−/− (Wang et al., 2011) or Δex13-16−/− mice (Peca et al., 2011)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bozdagi et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yang et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Short-term and long-term memory in a social transmission test are impaired in Δex4-9J−/− mice.

    “Short-term and long-term memory in a social transmission test were impaired in Δex4-9J−/− mice (Wang et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In human patients, ASD is a behavioral diagnosis with considerable clinical heterogeneity.

    “In human patients, ASD is a behavioral diagnosis with considerable clinical heterogeneity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    NMDA receptor-dependent LTD and mGluR-dependent LTD are not affected in CA1 hippocampus of ex4-9B mice.

    “NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression (LTD) induced by low frequency stimulus and mGluR-dependent LTD induced by PP-LFS were not affected in CA1 hippocampus of ex4-9B mice”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bozdagi et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yang et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In striatum, mEPSC frequency and population spike amplitude are significantly decreased in Δex13-16−/− mice but only mildly affected in Δex4-7−/− mice.

    “In striatum, the frequency of mEPSCs and amplitude of population spikes were significantly decreased in Δex13-16−/− mice, but only mildly affected in Δex4-7−/− mice (Peca et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peca et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A naturally occurring Disc1 mutation in the 129 strain was segregated from the Δex4-9J−/− deletion but was not reported in other Shank3 mutant mice using 129 ES cells.

    “A naturally occurring Disc1 (Disrupted in schizophrenia) mutation in the 129 strain of ES cells (Clapcote et al., 2007; Clapcote and Roder, 2006) was segregated from the Δex4-9J−/− deletion (Wang et al., 2011) but was not reported in other Shank3 mutant mice using mouse 129 ES cells (Peca et al., 2011; Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Clapcote et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Clapcote and Roder, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mouse genetic background, animal age, and specific protocols may contribute to variability in synaptic transmission results.

    “In addition, mouse genetic background, animal age, and specific protocols used for the studies may contribute to the variability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This variation may be due to differential spatial and temporal expression of other Shank family members or compositional variation across glutamatergic synapse populations.

    “perhaps due to differential spatial and temporal expression of other Shank family members or to compositional variation across different populations of glutamatergic synapses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Synapse structure phenotypes vary with specific Shank3 mutations, differ across brain regions, and show developmental heterogeneity.

    “Notably, synapse structure phenotypes vary with specific Shank3 mutations, are different in different brain regions, and display developmental heterogeneity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Impaired performance in Morris water maze is seen in Δex4-9J−/− mice but not in Δex13-16−/− and Δex4-9B−/− animals.

    “Impaired performance in the Morris water maze task was seen in Δex4-9J−/− mice (Wang et al., 2011) but not in Δex13-16−/− (Peca et al., 2011) and Δex4-9B−/− animals (Yang et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peca et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yang et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Analysis of heterozygotes versus homozygotes, different measurements in different brain regions, and different genetic backgrounds could all contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity.

    “However, analysis of heterozygotes versus homozygotes, different measurements in different brain regions, as well as different genetic backgrounds could all contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mutations in SH3 and PDZ domains are missense in humans, whereas mouse Δex11 and Δex13-16 are exon deletion and frame shift mutations.

    “Mutations in the SH3 and PDZ domains are missense mutations in humans (Boccuto et al., 2012; Waga et al., 2011), but mouse mutation of Δex11 and Δex13-16 are exon deletion and frame shift mutations (Peca et al., 2011; Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Boccuto et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Waga et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peca et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Shank3 mutant mice differ significantly in learning and memory task performance despite consistent intellectual disability in patients with multiple SHANK3 mutations.

    “Despite the consistent intellectual disability reported in patients with multiple types of SHANK3 mutations, Shank3 mutant mice differed significantly in performance of learning and memory tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Several competing hypotheses have been proposed for core deficits and ancillary domains in ASD, but none have been widely accepted.

    “Several competing hypotheses have been proposed to account for core deficits and ancillary symptomatic domains in ASD, but none have been widely accepted (Belmonte et al., 2004; Courchesne et al., 2007; Geschwind and Levitt, 2007; Rubenstein, 2010; Zoghbi, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Belmonte et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Courchesne et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Geschwind and Levitt, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Although the triad of impaired social interaction, communication, and stereotypical behaviors is recognized as core to ASD, clinical presentation is highly varied in humans.

    “Although the triad of impaired social interaction, communication, and stereotypical behaviors is recognized as core to ASD, the clinical presentation of these impairments is highly varied in humans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Little is known about the neurological basis of ASD, and many brain regions and circuits have been implicated.

    “Remarkably little is known about the neurological basis of ASD, and many brain regions and circuits have been implicated in ASD (Amaral et al., 2008; Anagnostou and Taylor, 2011; Bauman and Kemper, 2005; Courchesne et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Amaral et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Anagnostou and Taylor, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bauman and Kemper, 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Functional studies are critical to determine the pathogenicity of specific genetic variants.

    “Functional studies are thus a critical component to determine the pathogenicity of specific genetic variants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Because of the rarity of sequence variants across the population, establishing a causal role for specific variants in human disease has been challenging.

    “Because of the rarity of sequence variants across the population, it has been challenge to establish a causal role for specific variants in human disease.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Specific mutations are likely to produce specific phenotypes in patients and must be modeled accordingly in mice for full translational potential.

    “Specific mutations are likely to produce specific phenotypes in patients and hence must be modeled accordingly in mice for the mutant mice to have full translational potential.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In mouse behavioral studies, testing paradigms for learning and memory have been widely accepted.

    “In mouse behavioral studies, testing paradigms for learning and memory have been widely accepted (Crawley, 2008; Crawley and Paylor, 1997; Morris, 1981).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Crawley, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Crawley and Paylor, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Morris, 1981 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The value of Shank mutant mice will depend critically on the ability to use human patients to validate their predictive utility.

    “Ultimately, the value of Shank mutant mice will depend critically on the ability to use human patients to validate their predictive utility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lesson learned from modeling SHANK mutations in mice will be valuable to modeling other ASD candidate genes.

    “The lesson learned from modeling SHANK mutations in mice will almost certainly be valuable to modeling other ASD candidate genes in the future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
85 of 85
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Animal models can bridge human ASD genetics to circuit-based deficits and to therapeutic strategies.

    “The development of animal models is an important step in bridging the human genetics of ASD to circuit-based deficits underlying the clinical presentation, and ultimately to discovering, designing, and deploying effective therapeutic strategies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The rat Shank2 cDNA reference accurately predicts the exon numbering of full-length mouse Shank2.

    “Using the longest rat cDNA of Shank2 deposited in GenBank (NM_201350) as a reference, one can deduce that exons 6 and 7 in mouse Shank2a isoform correspond to exons 16 and 17 of predicted full length mouse Shank2 deduced from rat cDNA (NM_201350)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Exons 6-7 of Shank2 encode the PDZ domain.

    “Exons 6-7 encode the PDZ domain of Shank2.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Shank proteins regulate the abundance and signaling of ionotropic glutamate receptors at excitatory synapses.

    “Shank proteins regulate the abundance and signaling of ionotropic glutamate receptors at excitatory synapses.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The same mutation comparison uses two different identifiers

    Minor

    The comparison introduces p.E1311fs as one of three mutations, then discusses p.E1331fs in its place. The text does not establish that these are the same mutation.

  • Conflicting years for the first Shank1 mouse report

    Minor

    The introduction dates the first Shank1 mutant-mouse report to 2008, while the mouse-model section dates it to 2007. Both statements refer to the first report.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 149 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Phelan, K. (2007). 22q13.3 Deletion Syndrome. In GeneReviews. R.A. Pagon, T.C. Bird, C.R. Dolan, and K.S., eds. (Seattle, WA: University of Seattle) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/GeneTests/review?db=genetests.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, Y.-H., & Ehlers, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
8-27
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014756302
Cited by
488
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 9
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks
  • Pfizer
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH098114)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5K12-HD0043494-08, K12HD043494)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, Shank1, Shank2, SHANK3, synaptic scaffolding proteins, postsynaptic density, glutamatergic synapses, synaptic dysfunction, mouse models of autism, genetic mutations, phenotypic heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Animals, Autistic Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Mice, Post-Synaptic Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review