Cited by 519Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingGender and Technology in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the Relationships Between Different Types of Facebook Use, Perceived Online Social Support, and Adolescents’ Depressed Mood

Open access
Frison, Eline, Eggermont, Steven·2016·Social Science Computer Review

Abstract

This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and boys’ and girls’ depressed mood. To address this aim, this study ( N = 910) developed a comprehensive model that (1) differs between specific types of Facebook use, (2) examines the mediating role of perceived online social support, and (3) takes adolescent users’ gender into account. Structural equation modeling showed that the harmful impact of Facebook use exclusively occurs among girls who passively use Facebook and among boys who actively use Facebook in a public setting. Girls, however, who actively use Facebook, either in a public setting or in a private setting and subsequently perceive online social support, benefit from actively using Facebook, as perceived online social support negatively predicted girls’ depressed mood. The discussion focuses on the explanation and understanding of these findings, key limitations, and directions for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0894439314567449

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Koutamanis M., 2014, Adolescents’ comments in social media: Who receives negative feedback and why?
  2. Tobin S. J., 2014, Social Influence, 10, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 519

Metadata

Authors
Frison, E., & Eggermont, S.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Frison, Eline
Venue
Social Science Computer Review
Published
2015-01-21
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
153-171
ISSN
  • 0894-4393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8286
OpenAlex
W1964309626
Cited by
519
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
63.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science Computer Review (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
Facebook use, gender differences, social media use, mediation, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review