Cited by 23Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Probing the digital exposome: associations of social media use patterns with youth mental health

Open access
Pagliaccio, David, Tran, Kate T., Visoki, Elina, DiDomenico, Grace E., Auerbach, Randy P., Barzilay, Ran·2024·NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience

Abstract

Recently, the U.S. Surgeon General issued an advisory highlighting the lack of knowledge about the safety of ubiquitous social media use on adolescent mental health. For many youths, social media use can become excessive and can contribute to frequent exposure to adverse peer interactions (e.g., cyberbullying, and hate speech). Nonetheless, social media use is complex, and although there are clear challenges, it also can create critical new avenues for connection, particularly among marginalized youth. In the current project, we leverage a large nationally diverse sample of adolescents from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study assessed between 2019–2020 ( N = 10,147, M age = 12.0, 48% assigned female at birth, 20% Black, 20% Hispanic) to test the associations between specific facets of adolescent social media use (e.g., type of apps used, time spent, addictive patterns of use) and overall mental health. Specifically, a data-driven exposome-wide association was applied to generate digital exposomic risk scores that aggregate the cumulative burden of digital risk exposure. This included general usage, cyberbullying, having secret accounts, problematic/addictive use behavior, and other factors. In validation models, digital exposomic risk explained substantial variance in general child-reported psychopathology, and a history of suicide attempt, over and above sociodemographics, non-social screentime, and non-digital adversity (e.g., abuse, poverty). Furthermore, differences in digital exposomic scores also shed insight into mental health disparities, among youth of color and sexual and gender minority youth. Our work using a data-driven approach supports the notion that digital exposures, in particular social media use, contribute to the mental health burden of US adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44277-024-00006-9

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media has had outsize effects on matters such as public discourse and free speech, or mental health of young people.

    “For all its positive and inclusive outcomes (110, 111), there is mounting evidence that social media has had outsize effects on matters such as public discourse and free speech (112), or mental health of young people (113–115).”

    From The benefits and dangers of anthropomorphic conversational agents (2025) · cites this paper as [114]

    The Results (page unavailable) associate higher digital exposomic risk with youth mental-health problems, including greater odds of a reported prior suicide attempt. But the Introduction (page unavailable) describes the broader evidence as small or mixed and says the direction of effects is uncertain. The cited paper therefore supports an association with youth mental health, not the claim that social media has had an outsize effect on it; this citation is not attached to the separate public-discourse claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [18]Anderson M, Jiang J. Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Res Center. 2018;31:1673–89.
  2. [61]Achenbach TM, Edelbrock C. Child behavior checklist. Burlington (Vt). 1991;7:371–92.
  3. [69]Feczko E, Conan G, Marek S, Tervo-Clemmens B, Cordova M, Doyle O, et al. Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) community MRI collection and utilities. bioRxiv:2021.07.09.451638v1 [Preprint]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 11]: [33 p.]. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.09.451638v1. · DOI
  4. [89]Gordon J. Addressing the crisis of Black youth suicide. Health. 2020;2019:2018.
  5. [96]Yau JC, Reich SM. Are the qualities of adolescents’ offline friendships present in digital interactions? Adolesc Res Rev. 2018;3:339–55.
  6. [105]APA. APA chief scientist outlines potential harms, benefits of social media for kids. American Psychological Association; 2023. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2023/02/harms-benefits-social-media-kids?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=apa-press-release-research&utm_content=feb14-prinstein-testimony.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pagliaccio, D., Tran, K. T., Visoki, E., DiDomenico, G. E., Auerbach, R. P., & Barzilay, R.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Barzilay, Ran
Venue
NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Published
2024-04-23
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2948-1570 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395050854
Cited by
23
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
FWCI
16.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH126181, R01 MH135488, K23 MH120437)
  • Tommy Fuss Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social media use, adolescent mental health, cyberbullying, social media addiction, suicide attempts, psychopathology, youth of color, sexual and gender minority youth, mental health disparities, Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, screen time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review