Cited by 82Face Recognition and PerceptionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Individual differences in learning the affective value of others under minimal conditions.

Open access
Bliss-Moreau, Eliza, Barrett, Lisa Feldman, Wright, Christopher I.·2008·Emotion

Abstract

This paper provides the first demonstration that people can learn about the positive and negative value of other people (e.g., neutral faces) under minimal learning conditions, with stable individual differences in this learning. In four studies, participants viewed neutral faces paired with sentences describing positive, negative or neutral behaviors on either two (Study 1) or four (Studies 2, 3, and 4) occasions. Participants were later asked to judge the valence of the faces alone. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that learning does occur under minimal conditions. Study 3 and 4 further demonstrated that the degree of learning was moderated by Extraversion. Finally, Study 4 demonstrated that initial learning persisted over a period of 2 days. Implications for affective processing and person perception are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.479

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals paired with positive valence characteristics are rated as more likeable and approachable, and the opposite occurs for those with negative information.

    “Individuals paired with positive valence characteristics are rated as more likeable and approachable but the opposite for those with negative information (22).”

    From Oxytocin, the peptide that bonds the sexes also divides them (2016) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barrett LF Brennan L Yemelyanova N Bliss-Moreau E She’s emotional, but he’s just having a bad day: Sex differences in emotion attribution 2008 Manuscript under review. Boston College.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bliss-Moreau, E., Barrett, L. F., & Wright, C. I.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2008
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
479-493
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2105963895
Cited by
82
References
72
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BCS 0527440)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K02 MH001981)
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD003312)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
individual differences, extraversion, person perception, emotional processing, neutral faces, learning persistence
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Environment, Extraversion, Psychological, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review