The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science
Abstract
Although nearly all domain experts agree that carbon dioxide emissions are altering the world’s climate, segments of the public remain unconvinced by the scientific evidence. Internet blogs have become a platform for denial of climate change, and bloggers have taken a prominent role in questioning climate science. We report a survey of climate-blog visitors to identify the variables underlying acceptance and rejection of climate science. Our findings parallel those of previous work and show that endorsement of free-market economics predicted rejection of climate science. Endorsement of free markets also predicted the rejection of other established scientific findings, such as the facts that HIV causes AIDS and that smoking causes lung cancer. We additionally show that, above and beyond endorsement of free markets, endorsement of a cluster of conspiracy theories (e.g., that the Federal Bureau of Investigation killed Martin Luther King, Jr.) predicted rejection of climate science as well as other scientific findings. Our results provide empirical support for previous suggestions that conspiratorial thinking contributes to the rejection of science. Acceptance of science, by contrast, was strongly associated with the perception of a consensus among scientists.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A related property of conspiracy theories is that they can protect cherished beliefs (e.g., vaccination is harmful; climate change is not a serious concern) by casting overwhelmingly disconfirmatory evidence (e.g., scientific findings) as the product of a conspiracy (Lewandowsky, Oberauer, & Gignac, 2013).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Lewandowsky, Oberauer, & Gignac, 2013
In the citing paper
“because beliefs in conspiracy theories in general are associated with a mistrust of scientific claims [16]”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Among visitors to climate blogs, the tendency to endorse conspiracy theories has been shown to be correlated with the rejection of climate science as well as the rejection of other scientific propositions [27].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“the data provide further evidence for the link between the rejection of science and a conspiratorial cognitive style in general”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“A further 3 items queried scientific propositions that were also used in previous research [27], [38].”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“the present study and related precedents [2]–[7], [18]–[21], [27] have identified worldviews and conspiracist ideation as two vehicles with which such motivated reasoning is exercised.”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The potential predictor constructs were all based on established instruments that have been repeatedly used in previous research”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Self-citationMcCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x · Cited by 2,340
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. T., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y · Cited by 1,221
Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,217
Goertzel, T. (1994) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791630 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 3×
“, or that the Air Force is hiding evidence of extraterrestrial visitors (Goertzel, 1994; Swami, ChamorroPremuzic, & Furnham, 2009).”
BackgroundConspiracy theories: Causes and cures
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x · Cited by 1,050 · cited 4×
“Conspiracist ideation is, by definition, difficult to correct because any evidence contrary to the conspiracy is itself considered evidence of its existence (Bale, 2007; Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialDefeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement's Impact on U.S. Climate Change Policy
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348 · Cited by 904
Expert credibility in climate change
Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107 · Cited by 872
A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change.
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2008) · Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.3200/envt.50.5.26-35 · Cited by 780
The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism
Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010802055576 · Cited by 763
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209351435 · Cited by 720
Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects
Hamilton, L. C. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8 · Cited by 628
Fixing the communications failure
Kahan, D. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/463296a · Cited by 602
Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009) · Eos · doi:10.1029/2009eo030002 · Cited by 568
Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession?
Scruggs, L. A., & Benegal, S. (2012) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002 · Cited by 559
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276409356001 · Cited by 539
Giroux, H. A. (2004) · Third Text · doi:10.1080/0952882042000229827 · Cited by 528
The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1720 · Cited by 527
Self-citationSwami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x · Cited by 502
Swami, V., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1583 · Cited by 499 · cited 2×
“Most of the conspiracy items were adapted from previous research (e.g., Swami et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodThe Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society
Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B., & Schlosberg, D. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.001.0001 · Cited by 492
Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond?
Diethelm, P. A., & McKee, M. (2008) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn139 · Cited by 485
Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation: The Case of Belief in Global Climate Change
Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916505277998 · Cited by 473
Boykoff, M. (2007) · Area · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x · Cited by 470
Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement
Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1295 · Cited by 441
Organized Climate Change Denial
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0010 · Cited by 433
Are HIV/AIDS Conspiracy Beliefs a Barrier to HIV Prevention Among African Americans?
Bogart, L. M., & Thorburn, S. (2005) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/00126334-200502010-00014 · Cited by 403
Paranoia within reason : a casebook on conspiracy as explanation
Marcus, G. E. (1999) · Cited by 350
The Copenhagen diagnosis: updating the world on the latest climate science
Allison, I., Bindoff, N. L., Bindschadler, R., Cox, P. M., de Noblet‐Ducoudré, N., England, M. H., Francis, J., Gruber, N., Haywood, A. M., Karoly, D. J., et al. (2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6301 · Cited by 326
Climate Change PolicyPreprint
Toman, M., & Shogren, J. F. (2000) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 281
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x · Cited by 261
Michaels, D., & Monforton, C. A. (2005) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2004.043059 · Cited by 252
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.148.2.210-222 · Cited by 247 · cited 1×
“Douglas and Sutton (2008) showed that after exposure to conspiracy theories about the death of Princess Diana, participants were demonstrably affected by those theories even when they tried to dismiss their influence.”
BackgroundBale, J. M. (2007) · Patterns of Prejudice · doi:10.1080/00313220601118751 · Cited by 217
Why the "Death Panel" Myth Wouldn't Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate
Nyhan, B. J. (2010) · The Forum · doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1354 · Cited by 198
Stocking, S. H., & Holstein, L. W. (2008) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662507079373 · Cited by 174
Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation
Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x · Cited by 173
Self-citationGlobal warming estimates, media expectations, and the asymmetry of scientific challenge☆
Freudenburg, W. R., & Muselli, V. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.003 · Cited by 149
Conspiracy theories in science
Goertzel, T. G. (2010) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2010.84 · Cited by 149
Denying AIDS: conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and human tragedy
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-0314 · Cited by 113
Kalichman, S. C. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79476-1 · Cited by 106
How the growth of denialism undermines public health
McKee, M., & Diethelm, P. A. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c6950 · Cited by 95
Fan, X. (2003) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164403251319 · Cited by 95
A General Theory of Climate Denial
Jacques, P. J. (2012) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00105 · Cited by 79
Misinformation and the “War on Terror”: when memory turns fiction into fact
Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511581199.010 · Cited by 58
Self-citation“There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS”: AIDS denialism beliefs among people living with HIV/AIDS
Kalichman, S. C., Eaton, L. A., & Cherry, C. (2010) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-010-9275-7 · Cited by 57
Stritzke, W. G. K., Lewandowsky, S., Denemark, D., Clare, J., & Morgan, F. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511581199 · Cited by 44
Self-citationAustralia, Indonesia and the world: public opinion and foreign policy
Cook, I. (2006) · Cited by 34
Climategate: A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes the Global Warming Scam
Sussman, B. (2010) · Cited by 31
Still Crazy After All These Years: The Challenge of AIDS Denialism for Science
Nattrass, N. (2009) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9641-z · Cited by 24
How much should the public know about climate science?
Somerville, R. C. J. (2010) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9938-y · Cited by 17
Mooney, C. (2007) · Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists · doi:10.2968/063006010 · Cited by 17
Defending the boundaries of science: AIDS denialism, peer review and the Medical Hypotheses saga
Nattrass, N. (2011) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01312.x · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Inhofe J., 2012, The greatest hoax: How the global warming conspiracy threatens your future
- Oreskes N., 2010, Merchants of doubt
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 · Cited by 1,985
Self-citationMeta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2943 · Cited by 1,616
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12568 · Cited by 1,511
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417718261 · Cited by 1,316
The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · Cited by 1,232
“The current research also speaks to a broader concern about conspiracy theorizing and science denial [8], [16], [44].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-03-26
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 622-633
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2148186201
- Semantic Scholar
- 3f3ad951efb5618f5b793f160714014645166e35
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 12
- FWCI
- 118.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
- Keywords
- climate change denial, conspiracy theories, conspiracy beliefs, free market ideology, public acceptance of science, HIV/AIDS, smoking and lung cancer
- MeSH terms
- Denial, Psychological, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fraud, Humans, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Science, Space Flight, United States, Moon, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Climatic Processes, Blogging, Climate Change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
