Cited by 305Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Working Memory Training May Increase Working Memory Capacity but Not Fluid Intelligence

Abstract

Working memory is a critical element of complex cognition, particularly under conditions of distraction and interference. Measures of working memory capacity correlate positively with many measures of real-world cognition, including fluid intelligence. There have been numerous attempts to use training procedures to increase working memory capacity and thereby performance on the real-world tasks that rely on working memory capacity. In the study reported here, we demonstrated that training on complex working memory span tasks leads to improvement on similar tasks with different materials but that such training does not generalize to measures of fluid intelligence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797613492984

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ekstrom R. B., 1976, Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests
  2. Freedman D., 1998, Statistics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–304 of 304

Metadata

Authors
Harrison, T. L., Shipstead, Z., Hicks, K. L., Hambrick, D. Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Engle, Randall W.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2013-10-03
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
2409-2419
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2158068742
Cited by
305
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 2
FWCI
45.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Association for Psychological Science
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory training, working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, transfer of training, working memory span, generalization of training effects, cognitive training
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Intelligence, Memory, Short-Term, Random Allocation, Transfer, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review