Cited by 1,381Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingEmployee Performance and Management

An Evidence-Based Model of Work Engagement

Bakker, Arnold B.·2011·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Employees who are engaged in their work are fully connected with their work roles. They are bursting with energy, dedicated to their work, and immersed in their work activities. This article presents an overview of the concept of work engagement. I discuss the antecedents and consequences of engagement. The review shows that job and personal resources are the main predictors of engagement. These resources gain their salience in the context of high job demands. Engaged workers are more open to new information, more productive, and more willing to go the extra mile. Moreover, engaged workers proactively change their work environment in order to stay engaged. The findings of previous studies are integrated in an overall model that can be used to develop work engagement and advance job performance in today’s workplace.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721411414534

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive well-being has been conceptualized as work engagement.

    “In a wealth of research, positive well-being has been conceptualized as work engagement (Bakker 2011).”

    From Work engagement in health professions education (2017) · cites this paper as Bakker 2011

  • Motivational outcomes of work engagement include being proactive and taking initiative, setting a high bar, feeling competent and striving for quality, and displaying helpful behavior, friendliness and being cooperative.

    “Motivational outcomes include being proactive and taking initiative (Sonnentag 2003; Hakanen et al. 2008; Salanova and Schaufeli 2008), setting a high bar, feeling competent and striving for quality (Bakker 2011), and displaying helpful behavior, friendliness and being cooperative (Babcock-Roberson and Strickland 2010; Bakker 2011).”

    From Work engagement in health professions education (2017) · cites this paper as Bakker 2011

  • Job satisfaction is regarded as a passive state at work whereas work engagement is an active state towards work.

    “Job satisfaction has been excluded as it is regarded as a passive state at work whereas work engagement is an active state towards work (Bakker 2011).”

    From Work engagement in health professions education (2017) · cites this paper as Bakker 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakker, A. B.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Bakker, Arnold B.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2011-08
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
265-269
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2118546791
Cited by
1,381
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 25
FWCI
80.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
work engagement, job demands, job resources, personal resources, antecedents of engagement, employee performance, labor productivity, proactive behavior, engagement model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review