Cited by 143Workaholism, burnout, and well-beingWorkplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout Research

Unfinished tasks foster rumination and impair sleeping—Particularly if leaders have high performance expectations

Syrek, Christine J., Antoni, Conny H.·2014·Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between time pressure and unfinished tasks as work stressors on employee well-being. Relatively little is known about the effect of unfinished tasks on well-being. Specifically, excluding the impact of time pressure, we examined whether the feeling of not having finished the week's tasks fosters perseverative cognitions and impairs sleep. Additionally, we proposed that leader performance expectations moderate these relationships. In more detail, we expected the detrimental effect of unfinished tasks on both rumination and sleep would be enhanced if leader expectations were perceived to be high. In total, 89 employees filled out online diary surveys both before and after the weekend over a 5-week period. Multilevel growth modeling revealed that time pressure and unfinished tasks impacted rumination and sleep on the weekend. Further, our results supported our hypothesis that unfinished tasks explain unique variance in the dependent variables above and beyond the influence of time pressure. Moreover, we found the relationship between unfinished tasks and both rumination and sleep was moderated by leader performance expectations. Our results emphasize the importance of unfinished tasks as a stressor and highlight that leadership, specifically in the form of performance expectations, contributes significantly to the strength of this relationship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0037127

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Syrek, C. J., & Antoni, C. H.
Affiliations
Universität Trier (DE)
Venue
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
Published
2014-10
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
490-499
ISSN
  • 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1307
OpenAlex
W2330032982
Cited by
143
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
German Ministry of Education and Research (ADFH01241608)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
unfinished tasks, rumination, sleep disorders, time pressure, occupational stressors, employee well-being, leadership, perseverative cognition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Employment, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review