The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Network Sites and Well-Being: The Role of Social Connection
Open accessAbstract
In the early days of the Internet, both conventional wisdom and scholarship deemed online communication a threat to well-being. Later research has complicated this picture, offering mixed evidence about how technology-mediated communication affects users. With the dawn of social network sites, this issue is more important than ever. A close examination of the extensive body of research on social network sites suggests that conflicting results can be reconciled by a single theoretical approach: the interpersonal-connection-behaviors framework. Specifically, we suggest that social network sites benefit their users when they are used to make meaningful social connections and harm their users through pitfalls such as isolation and social comparison when they are not. The benefits and drawbacks of using social network sites shown in existing research can largely be explained by this approach, which also posits the need for studying specific online behaviors in future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“online social networking site use tends to be related to less internalizing, to the extent that it includes positive interactions, enhances social support, and facilitates social connectedness”
From Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. (2020) · cites this paper as Clark, Algoe, & Green, 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“tends to be associated with more internalizing in instances when it is excessive, reduces time spent in in-person interactions, and in which interactions are negative or involve social comparisons”
From Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. (2020) · cites this paper as Clark, Algoe, & Green, 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“the ways in which they use social media can also influence their well-being,60,61”
From Social Media Use and Its Link to Physical Health Indicators (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
In the citing paper
“people use social media for a variety of reasons”
From Social Media Use and Its Link to Physical Health Indicators (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
In the citing paper
“Further, the passive use of social media, in particular (e.g.lurking behaviors; scrolling through others' feeds without actually engaging), has been associated with increased loneliness and lowered well-being [51,52,53 ,54 ,55].”
From Two social lives: how differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes (2020) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Online interaction can harm well-being and reduce sociality if it displaces in-person connections [51,52,53 ,54 ].”
From Two social lives: how differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes (2020) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Online interactions can not only build new connections, but they can also complement and strengthen existing personal connections [51,52,54 ,58].”
From Two social lives: how differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes (2020) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“the different ways in which people use social media can influence their well-being (e.g., Verduyn et al., 2015; see Clark et al., 2018)”
From Social media use and systemic inflammation: The moderating role of self-esteem (2021) · cites this paper as Clark et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory
Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(00)80003-9 · Cited by 2,521
Marriage and health: His and hers
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.4.472 · Cited by 2,460
Kraut, R. E., Kiesler, S. B., Boneva, B. S., Cummings, J. N., Helgeson, V. S., & Crawford, A. M. (2002) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00248 · Cited by 2,367
Chou, H.-T. G., & Edge, N. (2012) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0324 · Cited by 1,166
Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238 · Cited by 1,064
Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence.
Verduyn, P., Lee, D. S., Park, J., Shablack, H., Orvell, A., Bayer, J., Ybarra, O., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000057 · Cited by 988 · cited 2×
“Across two studies using experimental methods and experience sampling, passive Facebook use was linked to declines in well-being, while active Facebook use was not (Verduyn et al., 2015).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Wilson R. E. Gosling S. D. Graham L. T. (2012). (See References). A comprehensive review summarizing much of the early research on Facebook from multiple theoretical perspectives.
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497. · DOI · Paper page
- Gardner W. L., Pickett C. L., Knowles M. L. (2005). Social snacking and shielding: Using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs. In Williams K. D., Forgas J. P., von Hippel W. (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 227–242). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.49 · DOI
- 10.1177/174569161244290 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–448 of 448
Beyond a straight line: use-disorder and social media-related well-being across regional clustersPreprint
Yankouskaya, A., Almourad, M. B., Liebherr, M., Rashid, M., & Ali, R. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6890846/v1
Impact of Social Media Violence on Physical Health
Mishra, D. (2025) · Synthesis lectures on engineers, technology, and society · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95619-5_8
Nitschinsk, L., Tobin, S. J., Gugushvili, N., McComb, C., & Verduyn, P. (2025) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2025-4-3
“However, as passive usage on SNSs is less likely to create fulfilling social interactions it may feel meaningless (Clark et al., 2018; Dienlin & Johannes, 2020).”
The Contemporary Addiction: Social Media Use and Its Impact on Well-Being
Fernández-López, L., Laorden, E. M., Martín‐Sánchez, F., Almela, P., & Navarro‐Zaragoza, J. (2025) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1012605
Loneliness and Solitude in the Digital Age
Tsang, Y., & Ho, S. (2025) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1012738
Bainbridge, W. A. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009343602.013
Comparing functional impairments related to social network use disorder and internet gaming disorder
Zumrode, L., Reinicke, L., Bischof, A., Bischof, G., Schlossarek, S., Schmidt, H., Borgwardt, S., & Rumpf, H. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2025.00087
“Furthermore, SNS use has unique potential harms such as higher probability to excessively draw social comparisons with others (Clark, Algoe, & Green, 2018).”
Valdez, D., Heinrich, K. M., Collinson, B., Streetman, A. E., & Sloan, Z. (2025) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/68438
“Individuals wanting to change behaviors may seek online and offline resources to initiate or sustain recovery from substance use and related challenges [30-32].”
Howard, H., Simpson, D., Marmershteyn, I., & Berner, A. B. (2025) · Social Work in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/15332985.2025.2597902
“It has been shown that increasing social connections is associated with positive psychological well-being (Clark et al., 2018).”
Efectos del uso de redes sociales sobre el bienestar subjetivo en Latinoamérica
Caravaggio, L. A. (2025) · Revista de Economía del Rosario · doi:10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/economia/a.15552 · Cited by 1
Sosyal Medya Bağlamında FoMO ve İyi Oluş: Uykusuzluğun Aracı Rolü
Bozkaya, Ş., Polat, Ö. B., Köksal, B. K., Tukur, A., & Tasdemir-Ozdes, A. (2025) · Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.52642/susbed.1622391
“…uykusuzluk çekiyor olması, bu uykusuzluğun günlük işlevselliklerini bozacak seviyede olmaması dolayısıyla sosyal medya kullanımının yalnızca olumlu etkilerini (Ahn ve Shin, 2013, s. 2458–2459; Clark ve diğerleri, 2018, s. 34; Wadsley ve diğerleri, 2022, s. 2503) deneyimliyor olmaları mümkündür.”
Alfraih, S. S. (2025) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87584-7_177 · Cited by 1
Talaman, J., Necosia, M. D., Villalon, L., & Tomines, E. M. (2026) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education & Learning Innovation · doi:10.56003/jaieli.v1i2.571
“However, unlike studies that primarily emphasize the social or affective benefits of social media use, such as relational closeness and well-being (Clark, Algoe, & Green, 2018), the present findings foreground students’ epistemic engagement, particularly their efforts to verify information and…”
Yin, X.-Q., Wang, J., Niu, X., Scherr, S., Gaskin, J. E., & McDonnell, D. (2026) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2026-1-8
“…that both the valence of interaction and the tie strength of interactive targets could have impacts on the effect of SNS use (Burke & Kraut, 2016; J. L. Clark et al., 2018), future research should further examine the quality and targets of these private exchanges to better understand why these…”
Social Support in Close Relationships
Helgeson, V. S., Naqvi, J. B., & Horner, F. S. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009381949.021
Díaz, M., Soriano, E., Swirsky, J. M., Rosie, M., Stewart, A., King, J., Wunsche, L., Darley, A., & Xie, H. (2026) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/21676968261425274
Lee, D. S., Jiang, T., & Way, B. M. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-39242-8
Zhang, L., Bellaert, N., Zhuo, H., Liew, Z., & Tseng, W.-L. (2026) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/10445463251415497
Liu, Z., Quan, Q., & Kim, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1700690
“This process not only reduces the subjective sense of isolation among rehabilitation patients but also fosters their motivation to engage in platform interaction and emotional expression, forming a perceived “state of connectedness” (Clark et al., 2018; Voggenreiter et al., 2023).”
Yunzi, X., Chen, P., & Shen, Y. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6411745
An appreciative inquiry into protective lifestyle factors for longevity
Roberson, L. B., Obeng, R., Dada, O. M., Naber, J., Malm, E. K., Heinrich, E., & Dodd, A. (2026) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2026.2650502
Internet benefits are not one-size-fits-all: age and trust shape digital wellbeing gains
Yu, Y., Luo, S., & Sun, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1736005
“On the other hand, social interaction is a critical source of SWB, as frequent, high-quality social contact is strongly linked to greater wellbeing (Clark et al., 2018; Utz and Breuer, 2017).”
Mechanisms of social media influence on addictive behavior of youth
Bogićević, D., & Popović-Ćitić, B. (2025) · CM Communication and Media · doi:10.5937/cm20-53805
Sutcliffe, S., Jones, C. A., Talbot, C. V., & Tibber, M. S. (2026) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/21676968261446343
“This also re fl ects the key premise of the interpersonal-connection-behaviours framework on which the TCBC draws (Clark et al., 2018), which is that SM is -in large part-helpful or unhelpful to the user to the extent that it supports or hinders satisfaction of core needs, particularly those…”
InfluentialBah, A., Onditi, F., Wambua, D., & Wanyonyi, N. (2026) · Journal of International Development · doi:10.1002/jid.70084
The Comprehensive Assessment of Social Media Use: Development and Validation Study
Lowry, N. J., Gebert, R. R., Rogers, Z., Cha, C., & Jacobson, C. M. (2026) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/87599
Niyazova, G. Z., Kerimbayeva, B., Berdi, D., Bazarbayeva, A., & Sadykova, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1751648
Digital transformation and mental health among young adults
Zhang, Q., Du, C., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1800927
Well-Being and Digitalization in Egypt
Elmassah, S., & Hassanein, E. A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198939672.003.0015
Lopez, R. B., Moughan, E., KOUZNETSOV, S., Nephew, B. C., King, J. A., & Lee, D. S. (2026) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-026-00659-7
Media Consumption and Mass Violence–Related Distress in Communities Affected by Mass Violence
Morgan, C. H., Davies, F., Robinson, L. E., Rancher, C. E., Kilpatrick, D. G., & Moreland, A. D. (2026) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.18226
A Seat at The Table: Teen Experiences and Perceptions of Social Media Recommendation Algorithms
Nyhan, M., Doherty, K., Snow, D., Moylan, K., Jacka, R., Fox, I., O’Sullivan, B., Griffith, J., & Leavy, S. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3773077.3806115
“For example, SNSs provide critical digital affordances, including opportunities for identity exploration [85], creative expression [8], and social connection [29].”
Tibber, M. S., Zhang, C., & Wang, M. (2026) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2026-3-5
“…links SM use to perceived social isolation/loneliness among young adults (e.g., Primack et al., 2017), and suggests that social connection/disconnection is crucial in determining the relative likelihood of benefits and harms of SM use being experienced (Clark et al., 2018; Tibber & Silver, 2022).”
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Psikolojik Sıkıntı Düzeyleri ve Sosyal Ağlardan Sosyal Destek Beklentileri
Sarıkaya, N. A., & Sanal, B. (2026) · Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.34087/cbusbed.1691285
Gorla, L., Rothenberg, W. A., Lansford, J. E., Ghazanfar, A., He, E., Alban, C., & Aref, A. (2026) · Marriage & Family Review · doi:10.1080/01494929.2026.2687017
Developing Children’s Wellbeing Through Dialogic Pedagogies for Critical Digital and Media Literacy
Goto, E. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83742-167-120261007
Singh, V. P. K., Verma, P. M., & Singh, L. (2026) · Journal of Indian System of Medicine · doi:10.5005/jism-11051-0032
Adolescent ‘Influencers’: Peer-Nominated Social Media Visibility and Links to Social Behavior
Gayle, D., & Mayeux, L. (2026) · The Journal of Genetic Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221325.2026.2708120
Yasui, T. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1479-363620260000025004
Isser, M., & Gazit, T. (2026) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-08-2025-0670
Xu, W., Hernandez, A., Oloomi, S., Monachino, A. D., Tung, I., Shuffrey, L. C., & Morales, S. (2026) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-026-00405-5
Beyond Text: Embodiment and Robots
Perry, A., & Cameron, C. D. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009639057.016
From Social Media to Empathic Artificial Intelligence
Rodriguez, M., Motyl, M., & Schroeder, J. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009639057.023
Norrholm, S. D., Szewczuk, M., & Jovanović, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1934406
“In fact, a high quality and quantity of interpersonal relationships can serve as a buffer against loneliness, isolation, and somatic/physical ailments; the latter factors being associated with higher prevalence of adverse posttraumatic reactions (Clark et al., 2018).”
Wei, Y., Zhao, T., Li, L., & Zheng, L. (2026) · Sexual & Relationship Therapy · doi:10.1080/14681994.2026.2737656
Ergasheva, D. A. Q. (2026) · Buxoro xalqaro universiteti ilmiy axborotnomasi · doi:10.67780/buxoro-xalqaro-universiteti-ilmiy-axborotnomasi.2026.2617299c
Xu, Y., Bairen, Z., Zhu, Z., & Li, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1908710
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, J. L., Algoe, S. B., & Green, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clark, Jenna L.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12-19
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-37
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2776212678
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 44.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- social network sites, well-being, social connectedness, social isolation, social comparison, online communication, technology-mediated communication, online behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
