Cited by 304Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAdolescent Health and Behaviors

Avoiding Social Risk in Adolescence

Open access
Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne·2018·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of life often characterized by behaviors that, prima facie, are irrational, such as seemingly excessive risk taking and impulsivity. However, these behaviors can be interpreted as adaptive and rational if one considers that a key developmental goal of this period of life is to mature into an independent adult in the context of a social world that is unstable and changing. It is proposed that for adolescents, the social risk of being rejected by peers outweighs other potentially negative outcomes of decisions, such as threats to one’s health or the prospect of getting caught. Furthermore, peer influence in adolescence can lead to prosocial as well as antisocial behaviors. Neurocognitive mechanisms of peer influence include the social reward of being accepted by one’s peer group, arousal, and increased mentalizing, which is associated with development of the social brain network. The findings from cognitive neuroscience and developmental psychology studies fit with recent public health evidence that the opinions of peers are particularly important to adolescents in areas such as school antibullying and antismoking campaigns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721417738144

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a lack of empirical evidence to support policy and practice development in this area.

    “However, the lack of empirical evidence to support policy and practice development in this area has been consistently voiced by clinicians and researchers.”
  • Restricting adolescent social media use is likely to be especially challenging, as adolescence is a developmental period of increasing autonomy during which peer interactions, belonging and acceptance are highly valued.

    “Restricting adolescent social media use is likely to be especially challenging, as this is a developmental period of increasing autonomy during which peer interactions, belonging and acceptance are highly valued.2”
  • The heightened susceptibility to social influence in adolescence, combined with increased concern about social rejection, increases the likelihood that adolescents will conform to peers to gain social acceptance and avoid exclusion.

    “The heightened susceptibility to social influence in adolescence, combined with increased concern about social rejection, increases the likelihood that adolescents will conform to their peers in order to gain social acceptance and avoid the social risk of being excluded by their peer group. 141-143”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [142]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blakemore, S.-J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
116-122
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2789863226
Cited by
304
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6
FWCI
17.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Science Framework
Funders
Royal Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
Keywords
adolescent risk-taking, peer rejection, peer influence, social risk, prosocial behavior, antisocial behavior, social reward, mentalization, social brain network, adolescent development, bullying prevention, anti-smoking campaigns, impulsivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review