Cited by 497Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and AggressionNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Social brain development and the affective consequences of ostracism in adolescence

Sebastian, Catherine, Viding, Essi, Williams, Kipling D., Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne·2010·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Recent structural and functional imaging studies have provided evidence for continued development of brain regions involved in social cognition during adolescence. In this paper, we review this rapidly expanding area of neuroscience and describe models of neurocognitive development that have emerged recently. One implication of these models is that neural development underlies commonly observed adolescent phenomena such as susceptibility to peer influence and sensitivity to peer rejection. Experimental behavioural evidence of rejection sensitivity in adolescence is currently sparse. Here, we describe a study that directly compared the affective consequences of an experimental ostracism manipulation (Cyberball) in female adolescents and adults. The ostracism condition led to significantly greater affective consequences in the adolescents compared with adults. This suggests that the ability to regulate distress resulting from ostracism continues to develop between adolescence and adulthood. The results are discussed in the context of models of neurocognitive development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.008

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A brief episode of social exclusion is distressing for adolescents.

    “We first replicated previous findings, showing that a brief episode of social exclusion is distressing for adolescents (Gunther Moor et al. 2012; Sebastian et al. 2010)”
  • Adolescents are hypersensitive to the negative consequences of social exclusion.

    “Adolescents are hypersensitive to the negative consequences of social exclusion.”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Sebastian et al. (2010)

  • Young and mid-adolescents (11-16 years) reported lowered overall mood after being excluded by other players in Cyberball, compared with adults.

    “young and mid-adolescents (11-16 years) reported lowered overall mood”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Sebastian et al. 2010

  • Young adolescents (11-14 years) reported higher state anxiety after exclusion, compared with adults.

    “young adolescents (11-14 years) reported higher state anxiety, compared with adults (Sebastian et al. 2010).”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Sebastian et al. 2010

  • Mood was lowered by the social exclusion condition, compared with baseline and inclusion, particularly strongly in the two adolescent groups.

    “Mood was lowered by the social exclusion condition, compared with baseline and inclusion, particularly strongly in the two adolescent groups.”

    From Is Adolescence a Sensitive Period for Sociocultural Processing? (2014) · cites this paper as Sebastian et al. (2010)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sebastian, C., Viding, E., Williams, K. D., & Blakemore, S.-J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sebastian, Catherine
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
134-145
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062913115
Cited by
497
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 21
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2013-10-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
social brain development, ostracism, peer rejection, rejection sensitivity, adolescence, Cyberball, affective consequences, emotion regulation, neurocognitive development, social cognition, peer influence, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Brain, Child, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review