Cited by 713Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The Teenage Brain: Peer Influences on Adolescent Decision Making

Open access
Albert, Dustin, Chein, Jason, Steinberg, Laurence·2013·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Research efforts to account for elevated risk behavior among adolescents have arrived at an exciting new stage. Moving beyond laboratory studies of age differences in risk perception and reasoning, new approaches have shifted their focus to the influence of social and emotional factors on adolescent decision making. We review recent research suggesting that adolescent risk-taking propensity derives in part from a maturational gap between early adolescent remodeling of the brain’s socioemotional reward system and a gradual, prolonged strengthening of the cognitive-control system. Research has suggested that in adolescence, a time when individuals spend an increasing amount of time with their peers, peer-related stimuli may sensitize the reward system to respond to the reward value of risky behavior. As the cognitive-control system gradually matures over the course of the teenage years, adolescents grow in their capacity to coordinate affect and cognition and to exercise self-regulation, even in emotionally arousing situations. These capacities are reflected in gradual growth in the capacity to resist peer influence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721412471347

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decision-making in the presence of peers is substantially different from individual decisions.

    “Accordingly, decision-making in the presence of peers is substantially different from individual decisions [56].”

    From Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects (2017) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Identification of Mechanisms section reports that adolescents took more risks and preferred immediate rewards when peers were present than when alone. But the claim leaves out an important limit: the paper reports no peer-related increase in risk-taking among adults and no difference on the adolescent inhibitory-control task. It therefore supports a difference in some adolescent decisions, not decision-making generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The importance of obtaining peer social approval increases and peer influence is heightened in adolescence.

    “The importance of obtaining peer social approval increases and peer influence is heightened in adolescence.7, 8, 9, 10”
  • Evidence from both humans and mice suggest there may be a related phenomenon in adolescence: peers may prime an environment in which other rewards increase in value.

    “Finally, evidence from both humans and mice suggest there may be a related phenomenon in adolescence: peers may prime an environment in which other rewards increase in value [37,38].”
  • The presence of peers may create an environment in which other rewarding stimuli take on an increased reward value, and this effect is enhanced in adolescence.

    “A related hypothesis is that the presence of peers may create an environment in which other rewarding stimuli take on an increased reward value, and that this effect is enhanced is adolescence [9,37,38].”
  • Peers may serve as a cue that biases behaviors that occur in the presence of peers through the decision-making and reinforcement learning process.

    “Consistent with both of these accounts, peers may serve as a cue that biases behaviors that occur in the presence of peers through the decision-making and reinforcement learning process; for a review, see Albert et al. (2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Albert D Steinberg L 2011 See References A comprehensive presentation of the neurodevelopmental model of peer influences on adolescent decision making PMC4276317 25544805
  2. Falk EG Way BM Jasinska AJ 2012 See References A recent review highlighting promising new directions for neuroscientific research on social influence across the lifespan
  3. Brown BB Larson J 2009 Peer relationships in adolescents Handbook of adolescent psychology, Vol 2: Contextual influences on adolescent development 3rd 74 103 Hoboken, NJ US John Wiley & Sons Inc
  4. Weigard A Chein J Steinberg L 2011 5 Influence of anonymous peers on risk-taking behavior in adolescents Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Stanford Undergraduate Psychology Conference Stanford, CA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2013-04
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
114-120
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2105763928
Cited by
713
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007376)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
adolescent brain development, adolescent risk-taking, cognitive control, socio-emotional processing, peer influence, self-regulation, risk-taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review