Cited by 494Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionSports, Gender, and Society

Us versus them: social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm

Open access
Cikara, Mina, Botvinick, Matthew M., Fiske, Susan T.·2011·Psychological Science

Abstract

Intergroup competition makes social identity salient, which in turn affects how people respond to competitors' hardships. The failures of an in-group member are painful, whereas those of a rival out-group member may give pleasure-a feeling that may motivate harming rivals. The present study examined whether valuation-related neural responses to rival groups' failures correlate with likelihood of harming individuals associated with those rivals. Avid fans of the Red Sox and Yankees teams viewed baseball plays while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Subjectively negative outcomes (failure of the favored team or success of the rival team) activated anterior cingulate cortex and insula, whereas positive outcomes (success of the favored team or failure of the rival team, even against a third team) activated ventral striatum. The ventral striatum effect, associated with subjective pleasure, also correlated with self-reported likelihood of aggressing against a fan of the rival team (controlling for general aggression). Outcomes of social group competition can directly affect primary reward-processing neural systems, which has implications for intergroup harm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797610397667

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outgroup pain is related to enhanced activity in the reward system (e.g., ventral striatum and nucleus accumbens).

    “Outgroup pain, on the other hand, is related to enhanced activity in the reward system (e.g., the ventral striatum and nucleus accumbens [Hein et al., 2010; Cikara et al., 2011; Luo et al., 2015]).”

    From A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict (2020) · cites this paper as Cikara et al., 2011

  • Previous fMRI studies have identified increased activity in both the empathy network (e.g., aMCC and AI) and the theory-of-mind network (e.g., mPFC and TPJ) in response to ingroup pain.

    “Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have identified increased activity in both the empathy network (e.g., the anterior midcingulate [aMCC] and anterior insula [AI]) and the theory-of-mind network (e.g., the medial prefrontal cortex [mPFC] and the temporoparietal junction [TPJ]) in response to ingroup pain (Hein et al., 2010; Cikara et al., 2011; Han, 2018).”

    From A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict (2020) · cites this paper as Cikara et al., 2011

  • People prefer for their groups to do better than other groups.

    “In addition to comparing our own outcomes with others’ outcomes, we also prefer for our groups to do better than other groups.”
  • Sports fans experience greater positive emotions and increased ventral striatum activity when seeing their favorite team do well or their rival team do poorly in reference to a neutral team.

    “That is, sports fans experience greater positive emotions and increased ventral striatum activity when seeing their favorite team do well or their rival team do poorly in reference to a neutral team 87.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Decety J 2010 Dissecting the neural mechanisms mediating empathy and sympathy Emotion Review in press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cikara, M., Botvinick, M. M., & Fiske, S. T.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Cikara, Mina
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2011-01-26
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
306-313
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2127117461
Cited by
494
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 20
FWCI
106.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Russell Sage Foundation
  • University Center for Human Values, Princeton University
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD047879)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
Keywords
intergroup competition, social identity, ventral striatum, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, baseball fans, Red Sox, New York Yankees, sports fandom
MeSH terms
Achievement, Aggression, Agonistic Behavior, Arousal, Basal Ganglia, Baseball, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Competitive Behavior, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Social Identification, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review