The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance: Effects of Level of Analysis and Task Interdependence
Abstract
This study extends previous work reviewing the cohesion-performance relationship by using meta-analytic techniques to assess the effects of level of analysis and task interdependence on the cohesion-performance relationship. A total of 51 effect sizesfmrom 46 empirical studies were obtainedfor the meta-analytic integration. Results suggest that level of analysis and task interdependence moderate the cohesion-performance relationship. Implications of the findingsforfuture research on group cohesion and performance are discussed
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210 · Cited by 1,398
Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985) · Journal of Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsp.7.3.244 · Cited by 1,050
Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496491222002 · Cited by 535
A disagreement about within-group agreement: disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus
Kozlowski, S. W., & Hattrup, K. (1992) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.2.161 · Cited by 514
Cited by
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 · Cited by 2,126
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635 · Cited by 1,671
One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331 · Cited by 1,558
Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations.
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989 · Cited by 1,321
Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310365001 · Cited by 907
Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/3069328 · Cited by 583
The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216880000400305 · Cited by 562
Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700202 · Cited by 518
A Meta-Analysis of Relationships Linking Employee Satisfaction to Customer Responses
Brown, S. P., & Lam, S. K. (2008) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.06.001 · Cited by 393
Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving
Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., & Hesse, F. W. (2018) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618808244 · Cited by 390
Mathieu, J. E., Kukenberger, M. R., D'Innocenzo, L., & Reilly, G. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038898 · Cited by 316
Communication in virtual teams: a conceptual framework and research agenda
Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., & Salas, E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.005 · Cited by 291
Burlingame, G. M., McClendon, D. T., & Alonso, J. (2011) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/a0022063 · Cited by 259
A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship
Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (2001) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640103200401 · Cited by 243
Chiocchio, F., & Essiembre, H. (2009) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496409335103 · Cited by 244
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1772 · Cited by 225
Transformational and Transactional Leadership in Virtual and Physical Environments
Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2003) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496403257527 · Cited by 181
Grossman, R., Nolan, K., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D., & Salas, E. (2022) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866211041157 · Cited by 133
Effects of prior knowledge on collaborative and individual learning
Zambrano R., J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.011 · Cited by 121
The Evolution of the Measurement of Cohesion
Siebold, G. L. (1999) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1101_2 · Cited by 98
Teams in Space Exploration: A New Frontier for the Science of Team Effectiveness
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Miller, C. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Vessey, W. B. (2015) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414566448 · Cited by 92
Reliable Effectiveness: A Theory on Sustaining and Replicating Worthwhile Innovations
Racine, D. P. (2006) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-006-0047-1 · Cited by 55
Peer-Assessing Peers' Contribution to EFL Group Presentations
Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2009) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688209105868 · Cited by 26
Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00045-8 · Cited by 151
What Matters for Team Cohesion Measurement? A Synthesis
Grossman, R., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D., & Salas, E. (2015) · Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice · doi:10.1108/s1534-085620150000017007 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J.
- Venue
- Small Group Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 497-520
- ISSN
- 1046-4964 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8278
- OpenAlex
- W2154059676
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
