Cited by 119Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild Therapy and Development

Cognitive-behavioural therapy for young children with anxiety disorders: Comparison of a Child + Parent condition versus a Parent Only condition

Waters, Allison M., Ford, Louise A., Wharton, Trisha A., Cobham, Vanessa E.·2009·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The present study compared the efficacy of a group-based cognitive-behavioural treatment (GCBT) delivered exclusively to parents of young anxious children (between 4 and 8 years of age) with the same intervention delivered to both children and parents, relative to a Wait-list Control condition. Parents of children in the Parent Only condition (N = 25) received 10 weekly sessions of GCBT whereas children and parents in the Parent + Child condition (N = 24) each received 10 weekly sessions of GCBT. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated that both active treatment conditions were superior to the Wait-list condition (N = 11), with 55.3% of children in the Parent Only condition and 54.8% of children in the Parent + Child condition no longer meeting criteria for their principal diagnosis at post-treatment. These treatment gains were maintained in both treatment conditions at six-month and 12-month follow-up assessments. There were no significant differences between the two active conditions on other outcome measures including parental psychopathology and parenting style. However, an unexpected finding was that parenting satisfaction and to some extent parenting competence reduced significantly from pre- to post-treatment regardless of the active treatment condition. The present results suggest that GCBT delivered exclusively to parents of young anxious children may be a viable treatment alternative for improving accessibility to efficacious treatments for children with anxiety disorders and for reducing costs associated with mental health care delivery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2009.04.008

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waters, A. M., Ford, L. A., Wharton, T. A., & Cobham, V. E.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Waters, Allison M.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
654-662
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076863489
Cited by
119
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, childhood anxiety disorders, young children, waitlist control, treatment efficacy, maintenance therapy, parenting satisfaction, parenting competence, parental psychopathology, parenting styles, access to mental health care, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Patient Dropouts, Personal Satisfaction, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Group, Waiting Lists, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Parenting, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review