The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO-100
Abstract
Psychometric properties of the 100-item English-language HEXACO Personality Inventory–Revised (HEXACO-PI-R) were examined using samples of online respondents ( N = 100,318 self-reports) and of undergraduate students ( N = 2,868 self- and observer reports). The results were as follows: First, the hierarchical structure of the HEXACO-100 was clearly supported in two principal components analyses: each of the six factors was defined by its constituent facets and each of the 25 facets was defined by its constituent items. Second, the HEXACO-100 factor scales showed fairly low intercorrelations, with only one pair of scales (Honesty–Humility and Agreeableness) having an absolute correlation above .20 in self-report data. Third, the factor and facet scales showed strong self/observer convergent correlations, which far exceeded the self/observer discriminant correlations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868306294907 · Cited by 2,171
Self-citationPsychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8 · Cited by 1,961
Self-citationPersonality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores.
Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116 · Cited by 1,068
Prosocial Behavior and Religion: New Evidence Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings
SAROGLOU, V., PICHON, I., TROMPETTE, L., VERSCHUEREN, M., & DERNELLE, R. (2005) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x · Cited by 449
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1080/13674676.2012.737771 · doi:10.1080/13674676.2012.737771
- Ashton M. C., Journal of Personality Assessment
- 10.1002/per.417 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00223890902935878 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/per.759 · DOI
- 10.1177/1088868314523838 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1088868309338467 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00495.x · DOI
- 10.1037/a0037942 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0037245 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0022641 · DOI · Paper page
- Costa P. T., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual
- 10.1002/per.1953 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- De Vries R. E., 2016, Using personality item characteristics to predict single-item reliability, retest reliability, and self-other agreement
- 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.513 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2015.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Jackson D. N., 1978, Advances in psychological assessment, 4, 55
- John O. P., 1999, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 102
- 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.182 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.004 · DOI
- Lee K., 2012, The H factor of personality: Why some people are manipulative, self-entitled, materialistic, and exploitive—And why it matters for everyone
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/per.1860 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1088868310366253 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013164497057001003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.056 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02289451 · DOI · Paper page
- Sibley C. G., 2011, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 142
- 10.1037/a0024165 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1073191116638411 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.01.012 · DOI
Cited by
Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis
Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000226 · Cited by 855
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.
Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000217 · Cited by 689
Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality
Stein, J.-P., Messingschlager, T., Gnambs, T., Hutmacher, F., & Appel, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53335-2 · Cited by 309
“A potential solution here would be to use the HEXACO inventory of personality 75 , which combines both the Big Five and the Dark Triad’s deviant traits into a novel taxonomy of human personality.”
MethodHorwood, S., & Anglim, J. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.013 · Cited by 163
A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust
Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., Pauwels, L., Vogt, B., & Fehr, E. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0878-x · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C.
- Venue
- Assessment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-13
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 543-556
- ISSN
- 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3489
- OpenAlex
- W2464250145
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 47.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO-100. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1073191116659134
- The paper
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116659134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
