Cited by 164Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Methyiphenidate vs. amphetamine: Comparative review

Open access
Arnold, L. E.·2000·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

This article compares the two most common medications for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), using data from controlled studies. Medline and Psychinfo searches were done for 1984-1996 with the key words methylphenidate (MPH) and amphetamine (AMP); these were supplemented with known prior and recent literature. Of 92 animal studies found, 15 showed clear differences between the two drugs. Ten reports of controlled crossover ADHD clinical trials (three in the same sample) and a dozen other articles comparing the two drugs in humans were found. MPH is a pure re-uptake inhibitor of catecholamines, especially dopamine; AMP also releases catecholamines. Lab animals showed differential interactions with other drugs and with behavioral paradigms. Human response profiles are noncongruent. An ADHD patient who fails on one stimulant should try the other. Of 174 patients in the 6 clearest crossover studies, 48 responded better to AMP, 27 to MPH, and at least 72 to both, which is an 87+% overall response rate if both are tried. All crossovers, except the one with comorbid Tourette's, showed a nonsignificant tendency for AMP superiority in response rate. Summed data suggest suspected differences in side effects (AMP more sleep and appetite loss and exacerbation of tics in comorbid Tourette's, MPH possibly more depression/apathy and stomachaches) and effects on comorbid disorders (AMP better for conduct/oppositional symptoms, MPH for Tourette's and possibly learning disorder (LD). Most of the clinical differences are tendencies rather than statistically significant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/108705470000300403

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Aman, M.G., & Rojahn, J. (1990). Pharmacological intervention. In N.N. Singh & I.L. Beale (Eds.), Current perspectives in learning disabilities: Nature, theory, and treatment. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  2. Grcevich, S, Rowane, W.A, Marcellino, B, & Sullivan-Hurst, S. (1999). Adderall vs. methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Poster at ChADD (Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit Disorder) 11th International Conference on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder, Washington, DC, October 7, 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnold, L. E.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Arnold, L. E.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2000-01
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
200-211
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2162170558
Cited by
164
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
methylphenidate, amphetamine, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, crossover trial, dopamine uptake inhibition, catecholamine release, adverse effects, treatment response, learning disabilities, conduct disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review