Cited by 158Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

A Meta-Analysis of Decision-Making and Attention in Adults With ADHD

Mowinckel, Athanasia M., Pedersen, Mads Lund, Eilertsen, Espen, Biele, Guido·2015·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Deficient reward processing has gained attention as an important aspect of ADHD, but little is known about reward-based decision-making (DM) in adults with ADHD. This article summarizes research on DM in adult ADHD and contextualizes DM deficits by comparing them to attention deficits. Method: Meta-analytic methods were used to calculate average effect sizes for different DM domains and continuous performance task (CPT) measures. Results: None of the 59 included studies (DM: 12 studies; CPT: 43; both: 4) had indications of publication bias. DM and CPT measures showed robust, small to medium effects. Large effect sizes were found for a drift diffusion model analysis of the CPT. Conclusion: The results support the existence of DM deficits in adults with ADHD, which are of similar magnitude as attention deficits. These findings warrant further examination of DM in adults with ADHD to improve the understanding of underlying neurocognitive mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054714558872

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with ADHD experience neuropsychological difficulties associated with deficient inhibition, memory, executive functioning, decision making, and emotional dysregulation.

    “Individuals with ADHD also experience neuropsychological difficulties associated with deficient inhibition [22], memory [22], executive functioning [23,24], decision making [25], and emotional dysregulation [26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mowinckel, A. M., Pedersen, M. L., Eilertsen, E., & Biele, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2014-12-04
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
355-367
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2154185987
Cited by
158
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
adult ADHD, reward-based decision-making, attention deficits, reward processing, continuous performance test, drift-diffusion model, cognitive control, neurocognitive mechanisms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review