Cited by 229Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Genetic variation in dopaminergic neuromodulation influences the ability to rapidly and flexibly adapt decisions

Open access
Krugel, Lea K., Biele, Guido, Mohr, Peter N. C., Li, Shu-Chen, Heekeren, Hauke R.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The ability to rapidly and flexibly adapt decisions to available rewards is crucial for survival in dynamic environments. Reward-based decisions are guided by reward expectations that are updated based on prediction errors, and processing of these errors involves dopaminergic neuromodulation in the striatum. To test the hypothesis that the COMT gene Val 158 Met polymorphism leads to interindividual differences in reward-based learning, we used the neuromodulatory role of dopamine in signaling prediction errors. We show a behavioral advantage for the phylogenetically ancestral Val/Val genotype in an instrumental reversal learning task that requires rapid and flexible adaptation of decisions to changing reward contingencies in a dynamic environment. Implementing a reinforcement learning model with a dynamic learning rate to estimate prediction error and learning rate for each trial, we discovered that a higher and more flexible learning rate underlies the advantage of the Val/Val genotype. Model-based fMRI analysis revealed that greater and more differentiated striatal fMRI responses to prediction errors reflect this advantage on the neurobiological level. Learning rate-dependent changes in effective connectivity between the striatum and prefrontal cortex were greater in the Val/Val than Met/Met genotype, suggesting that the advantage results from a downstream effect of the prefrontal cortex that is presumably mediated by differences in dopamine metabolism. These results show a critical role of dopamine in processing the weight a particular prediction error has on the expectation updating for the next decision, thereby providing important insights into neurobiological mechanisms underlying the ability to rapidly and flexibly adapt decisions to changing reward contingencies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0905191106

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krugel, L. K., Biele, G., Mohr, P. N. C., Li, S.-C., & Heekeren, H. R.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-10-20
Volume
106
Issue
42
Pages
17951-17956
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2156601568
Cited by
229
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 22
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
COMT Val158Met polymorphism, dopaminergic modulation, reward-based decision-making, prediction error, learning rate, striatum, prefrontal cortex, effective connectivity, reinforcement learning models, dopamine metabolism
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Dopamine, Female, Genotype, Homozygote, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Genetic Variation, Amino Acid Substitution, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review