Cited by 497Cultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCulture, Economy, and Development Studies

Are Cultures Becoming Individualistic? A Cross-Temporal Comparison of Individualism–Collectivism in the United States and Japan

Hamamura, Takeshi·2012·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

Individualism-collectivism is one of the best researched dimensions of culture in psychology. One frequently asked but underexamined question regards its cross-temporal changes: Are cultures becoming individualistic? One influential theory of cultural change, modernization theory, predicts the rise of individualism as a consequence of economic growth. Findings from past research are generally consistent with this theory, but there is also a body of evidence suggesting its limitations. To examine these issues, cross-temporal analyses of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan were conducted. Diverging patterns of cultural changes were found across indices: In both countries, some of the obtained indices showed rising individualism over the past several decades, supporting the modernization theory. However, other indices showed patterns that are best understood within the frameworks of a shifting focus of social relationships and a persisting cultural heritage. A comprehensive theory of cultural change requires considerations of these factors in addition to the modernization effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868311411587

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The theoretical framework of Inglehart and Welzel has been confirmed by recent findings in psychology using completely different data.

    “This theoretical framework has been confirmed by recent findings in psychology using completely different data.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamamura, T.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Hamamura, Takeshi
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2011-06-23
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
3-24
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2165944469
Cited by
497
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Keywords
individualism-collectivism, cultural change, modernization theory, cross-temporal change, United States, Japan, interpersonal relationships, cultural heritage, economic growth, cultural values
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Humans, Individuality, Japan, Social Behavior, Social Change, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review