Cited by 299Cultural Differences and ValuesCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesSocial and Cultural Studies

Social Structure, Infectious Diseases, Disasters, Secularism, and Cultural Change in America

Grossmann, Igor, Varnum, Michael E. W.·2015·Psychological Science

Abstract

Why do cultures change? The present work examined cultural change in eight cultural-level markers, or correlates, of individualism in the United States, all of which increased over the course of the 20th century: frequency of individualist themes in books, preference for uniqueness in baby naming, frequency of single-child relative to multichild families, frequency of single-generation relative to multigeneration households, percentage of adults and percentage of older adults living alone, small family size, and divorce rates (relative to marriage rates). We tested five key hypotheses regarding cultural change in individualism-collectivism. As predicted by previous theories, changes in socioeconomic structure, pathogen prevalence, and secularism accompanied changes in individualism averaged across all measures. The relationship with changes in individualism was less robust for urbanization. Contrary to previous theories, changes in individualism were positively (as opposed to negatively) related to the frequency of disasters. Time-lagged analyses suggested that only socioeconomic structure had a robust effect on individualism; changes in socioeconomic structure preceded changes in individualism. Implications for anthropology, psychology, and sociology are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797614563765

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The theoretical framework of Inglehart and Welzel has been confirmed by recent findings in psychology using completely different data.

    “This theoretical framework has been confirmed by recent findings in psychology using completely different data.”

    From Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart (2018) · cites this paper as Grossmann & Varnum, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossmann, I., & Varnum, M. E. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Grossmann, Igor
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2015-02-05
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
311-324
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2073396591
Cited by
299
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
43.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Studies
Keywords
cultural change, individualism-collectivism, individualism, socio-economic structure, pathogen prevalence, secularism, disasters, urbanization, single-child families, living alone, divorce rates, family size, baby naming, multigenerational families, United States
MeSH terms
Communicable Diseases, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Cultural Evolution, Disasters, Humans, Individuality, Social Behavior, United States, Secularism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review