Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 54

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein Intake and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Coelho-Júnior, Hélio José, Calvani, Riccardo, Landi, Francesco, Picca, Anna, Marzetti, Emanuele·2021·Nutrition and Metabolic Insights
DOI 10.1177/11786388211022373
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction: The present study investigated the association between protein intake and cognitive function in older adults. Methods: We performed a literature search with no restriction on publication year in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, AgeLine from inception up to October 2020. Observational studies that investigated as a primary or secondary outcome the association of protein intake and cognitive function in older adults aged ⩾60 years were included. Results: Nine cross-sectional studies that investigated a total of 4929 older adults were included in the qualitative analysis. Overall cognitive function was examined in 6 studies. Four investigations reported null associations and 2 studies found that older adults with a high protein intake had higher global cognitive function than their counterparts. Results from the meta-analysis suggested that there were no significant associations between protein consumption and global cognitive function in older adults, regardless of gender. Three studies investigated other cognitive domains. Memory and protein intake were significantly and positively correlated in all studies. In addition, visuospatial, verbal fluency, processing speed, and sustained attention were positively associated with protein consumption in 1 study each. Conclusion: No significant associations between protein intake and global cognitive function were observed in neither qualitative nor quantitative analyses. The association between protein consumption with multiple other cognitive domains were also tested. As a whole, 3 studies reported a positive and significant association between high protein intake and memory, while 1 study observed a significant and positive association with visuospatial, verbal fluency, processing speed, and sustained attention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/11786388211022373

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1111/jan.14261 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/jgs.15219 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/jgs.15378 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.archger.2019.104005 · DOI
  5. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005863 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1186/s12916-019-1295-8 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.3928/00989134-20180814-01 · DOI
  8. 10.3390/ijerph17103435 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/13607863.2020.1857691 · DOI
  10. 10.3233/JAD-180468 · DOI
  11. 10.17226/10490 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/gerona/gls229 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Calvani R, 2013, J Frailty Aging, 2, 38
  14. 10.1007/s40520-019-01216-4 · DOI
  15. 10.3390/nu12061635 · DOI
  16. 10.3390/nu10091334 · DOI
  17. 10.3390/nu10091330 · DOI
  18. 10.1001/jama.1983.03330450047024 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/BF03324295 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/ajcn/65.1.20 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/ajcn/66.4.803 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/sj.ph.1900729 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.011 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s00394-009-0086-y · DOI
  25. 10.1089/jmf.2012.0225 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s12603-020-1317-4 · DOI
  27. 10.3390/nu7042415 · DOI
  28. 10.3390/nu11061315 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.3945/jn.114.204305 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.3390/nu12102915 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s11064-017-2261-5 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1007/s11064-016-2057-z · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s00726-012-1330-y · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/s00702-014-1180-8 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00272-3 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1007/BF02253527 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1093/jn/130.4.1007s · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1056/nejmcibr0902052 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1093/jn/130.4.1026s · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00593.x · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0024-3205(81)90410-0 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0197-4580(89)90002-X · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0306-4522(87)90019-4 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80909-5 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/330649a0 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1017/s0033291700034826 · DOI
  50. Malhotra C, 2013, Ann Acad Med Singapore, 42, 315, 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V42N7p315 · DOI
  51. 10.1080/0361073X.2013.808109 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/1028415X.2016.1183341 · DOI
  53. 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328363c8d1 · DOI
  54. 10.1159/000154929 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/epirev/mxs004 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.024 · DOI
  57. 10.3389/fmed.2019.00026 · DOI
  58. Alhola P, 2007, Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 3, 553
  59. 10.1177/089198879901200203 · DOI
  60. 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00170 · DOI
  61. 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.585769 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.3390/nu10040506 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Coelho-Júnior, H. J., Calvani, R., Landi, F., Picca, A., & Marzetti, E.
Venue
Nutrition and Metabolic Insights
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2021-01
Volume
14
ISSN
1178-6388
DOI
10.1177/11786388211022373
Cited by
54
References
12
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.