Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subjective cognitive decline and risk of MCI: The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging

Open access
van Harten, Argonde C., Mielke, Michelle M., Swenson-Dravis, Dana M., Hagen, Clinton E., Edwards, Kelly K., Roberts, Rosebud O., Geda, Yonas E., Knopman, David S., Petersen, Ronald C.·2018·Neurology

Abstract

Objective We investigated different dimensions of subjective cognitive decline (SCD) to determine which was the best prognostic risk factor for incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among cognitively unimpaired participants. Methods We included 1,167 cognitively unimpaired participants, aged 70 to 95 years, from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging based on 2 concurrent SCD scales (part of the Blessed memory test and the 39-item Everyday Cognition [ECog] scale, which included a validated 12-item derivative) and a single question assessing worry about cognitive decline. We evaluated multiple ways to dichotomize scores. In continuous models, we compared average scores on 4 ECog domains and multidomain (39- and 12-item) ECog scores. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between each measure and risk of MCI in models adjusted for objective memory performance, depression, anxiety, sex, APOE ε4 carriership, and medical comorbidities. Results It was possible to select a substantial group of participants (14%) at increased risk of incident MCI based on combined baseline endorsement of any consistent SCD on the ECog (any item scored ≥3; 12-item ECog hazard ratio [HR] 2.17 [95% confidence interval 1.51–3.13]) and worry (HR 1.79 [1.24–2.58]) in an adjusted model combining these dimensions. In continuous models, all ECog domains and the multidomain scores were associated with risk of MCI with a small advantage for multidomain SCD (12-item ECog HR 2.13 [1.36–3.35] per point increase in average score). Information provided by the informant performed comparable to self-perceived SCD. Conclusion Prognostic value of SCD for incident MCI improves when both consistency of SCD and associated worry are evaluated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000005863

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.12.013 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2188 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/acps.12336 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1017/S104161021600106X · DOI
  7. 10.3233/JAD-150154 · DOI · Paper page
  8. La Joie R, Perrotin A, Egret S, et al. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of self-reported cognitive difficulties in nondemented elders: association with medical help seeking, cognitive deficits, and β-amyloid imaging. Alzheimers Dement 2016;5:23–34.
  9. 10.1159/000115751 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f11d85 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/geronj/37.3.323 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1037/0894-4105.22.4.531 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.02.007 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.09.002 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
  18. Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck Anxiety Inventory Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1993.
  19. Wechsler DA. Manual for the Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1987.
  20. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.14100268 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181df49fb · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.30 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/acps.12328 · DOI
  24. 10.1212/WNL.57.12.2217 · DOI
  25. 10.3233/JAD-150090 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/jgs.14835 · DOI
  27. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001738 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.03.002 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03956.x · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.09.001 · DOI
  31. 10.3233/JAD-150117 · DOI
  32. 10.3233/JAD-140678 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1007/s11065-016-9332-2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Koppara A, Wagner M, Lange C, et al. Cognitive performance before and after the onset of subjective cognitive decline in old age. Alzheimers Dement 2015;1:194–205.
  35. 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.08.001 · DOI

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
van Harten, A. C., Mielke, M. M., Swenson-Dravis, D. M., Hagen, C. E., Edwards, K. K., Roberts, R. O., Geda, Y. E., Knopman, D. S., & Petersen, R. C.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2018-07-24
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
e300-e312
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2810367404
Cited by
312
References
10
FWCI
16.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subjective cognitive decline and risk of MCI: The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.0000000000005863
The paper
van Harten, A. C., Mielke, M. M., Swenson-Dravis, D. M., Hagen, C. E., Edwards, K. K., Roberts, R. O., Geda, Y. E., Knopman, D. S., & Petersen, R. C. (2018). Subjective cognitive decline and risk of MCI: The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000005863

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.