Cited by 19Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychological Testing and AssessmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Predictive validity for the clinical diagnosis of a new parent questionnaire, the CABI, compared with CBCL

Open access
Cianchetti, Carlo, Faedda, Noemi, Pasculli, Marcello, Ledda, Maria Giuseppina, Diaz, Giacomo, Peschechera, Antonia, Craig, Francesco, Morelli, Federica +4 more·2020·Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The questionnaires completed by the parents give a first general information on the behavioral problems of the child–adolescent, as a useful orientation to the clinical evaluation. The Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI) is a 75-item parent questionnaire, which explores a large number of problem areas. The study of its predictive validity for the clinical diagnosis, in comparison with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM)-oriented scales of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), can assess whether its use may be advantageous. Material and Methods: Parents/caregivers of 462 children and adolescents responded to both CABI and CBCL as a preliminary routine investigation. The results were compared with those of diagnoses obtained after the completion of the usual clinical procedure. Results: Accuracy values (probability of correct classification) resulted high for both instruments and significantly better for CABI anxiety and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) scales, and for CBCL oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD) scales; no significant difference was found for depression scales. All the areas under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic analysis reached excellent values, suggesting a very good predictive ability of the five scales of the two instruments. The comparison of AUC showed the CABI’s anxiety and ADHD scales to give significantly higher values than those of CBCL, indicating that these two scales have a better predictive ability. Conclusion: The study indicates a very good comparative (vs CBCL) and predictive validity of the CABI, suggesting an advantage in the use of this shorter questionnaire, available for free use both for clinical practice and supposedly for screening and epidemiological evaluations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359104519895056

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cianchetti, C., Faedda, N., Pasculli, M., Ledda, M. G., Diaz, G., Peschechera, A., Craig, F., Morelli, F., Balottin, U., Guidetti, V., Zuddas, A., & Margari, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera G. Brotzu (IT)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Corresponding author
Cianchetti, Carlo
Venue
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Published
2020-01-02
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
507-519
ISSN
  • 1359-1045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7021
OpenAlex
W2997509572
Cited by
19
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Child Behavior Checklist, predictive validity, parent questionnaires, child and adolescent behavioral problems, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, depression, diagnosis, screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review