Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 128

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use

Qiu, Xuyan, Lo, Yuen Yi·2017·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

Previous research has considered the effects of content familiarity and task repetition on second language (L2) performance, but few studies have looked at the effect of these factors on learners’ engagement in task performance. This study explores the influence of content familiarity and task repetition on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ engagement in oral performance. Sixty EFL learners performed four narrative tasks with two familiar and two unfamiliar topics. They also repeated the same tasks to the same audience. Their oral production was analysed with various measures of behavioural and cognitive engagement. Stimulated recalls were collected from twenty-one participants to capture their emotional engagement. The participants were behaviourally and cognitively more engaged in tasks with familiar topics as well as having a more positive affective response to them. Repeating the tasks, however, negatively influenced behavioural and cognitive engagement, although the participants felt more relaxed and confident. In addition, the participants were more motivated to repeat unfamiliar topics, although they demonstrated more noticeable declines in their frequency of self-repair (an indicator of cognitive engagement) for these topics. These results provided empirical evidence for the relationship between task design and implementation factors and L2 task engagement. Teachers might base repetition decisions partially on learners’ familiarity with the topic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168816684368

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1177/1362168816683563 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00012-4 · DOI
  3. 10.4135/9781446279526.n1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bui H.Y.G., 2014, Processing perspectives on task performance, 5, 63, 10.1075/tblt.5.03gav · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1362168816656650). · DOI
  6. Bygate M., 2009, Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honour of Susan M. Gass, 90
  7. 10.2307/3586498 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1017/S0272263198003015 · DOI
  9. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  10. 10.1177/026553229200900206 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/1540-4781.00204 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/applin/amp042 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1017/S0272263109990544 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00996.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Holm S., 1979, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65
  16. 10.1075/lllt.34.04ch1 · DOI
  17. Lambert C., 2014, Task sequencing and instructed language learning
  18. 10.1017/S0272263116000085). · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/1362168816683559 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1080/00220671.2013.807491 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1080/00220671.2013.807491 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00408.x · DOI
  23. 10.1017/S0272263104261022 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00060.x · DOI
  25. Maehr M.L., 1984, Motivation in education: student motivation, 1, 115
  26. 10.1177/1362168816683561 · DOI
  27. Raatz U., 1981, Practice and problems in language testing: Proceedings of the fourth international language testing symposium of the Interuniversitaäre Sprachtestgruppe, 113
  28. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.2167/la401.0 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02030.x · DOI
  31. 10.1075/tblt.5 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1017/S0267190515000100 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1177/0013164408323233 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_30 · DOI

Cited by

See all 128

Metadata

Authors
Qiu, X., & Lo, Y. Y.
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2016-12-25
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
681-698
ISSN
  • 1362-1688
  • 1477-0954
Cited by
128
References
8
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Funders
Faculty Research Fund, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.