Cited by 31Digital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Design of a Mindfulness Virtual Community: A focus-group analysis

Open access
El Morr, Christo, Maule, Catherine, Ashfaq, Iqra, Ritvo, Paul, Ahmad, Farah·2020·Health Informatics Journal

Abstract

Mental illnesses are on the rise on campuses worldwide. There is a need for a scalable and economically sound innovation to address these mental health challenges. The aim of this study was to explore university students’ needs and concerns in relation to an online mental health virtual community. Eight focus groups ( N = 72, 55.6% female) were conducted with university students aged 18–47 (mean = 23.38, SD = 5.82) years. Participants were asked about their views in relation to online mental health platform. Three major themes and subthemes emerged: (1) perceived concerns: potential loss of personal encounter and relationships, fear of cyber bullying, engagement challenge, and privacy and distraction; (2) perceived advantages: anonymity and privacy, convenience and flexibility, filling a gap, and togetherness; and (3) desired features: user-centered design, practical trustworthy support, and online moderation. The analysis informed design features for a mindfulness virtual community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1460458219884840

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic reviews show that meditation and mindfulness-based intervention programs improve resilience to stress, anxiety and depression among university students and other populations, whether delivered offline or online.

    “Systematic reviews conducted on the effectiveness of meditation programs and mindfulness-based intervention programs led to improvements in resilience to stress, anxiety and depression among university students and other populations, whether delivered offline [9] or online [10–14].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El Morr, C., Maule, C., Ashfaq, I., Ritvo, P., & Ahmad, F.
Affiliations
  • York University, Canada
  • York University (CA)
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Published
2019-11-11
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
1560-1576
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
OpenAlex
W2983308304
Cited by
31
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (EH1- 143553)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
mindfulness, online communities, online mental health platforms, university students, student mental health, user needs, cyberbullying, online content moderation, user-centered design
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Focus Groups, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review