Cited by 27Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Effects of Video-Guided Group vs. Solitary Meditation on Mindfulness and Social Connectivity: A Pilot Study

Open access
Hanley, Adam W., Dehili, Vincent, Krzanowski, Deidre, Barou, Daniela, Lecy, Natalie, Garland, Eric L.·2022·Clinical Social Work Journal

Abstract

Interest in mindfulness meditation continues to grow as accumulating evidence suggests mindfulness training encourages more positive functioning. However, basic questions about the conditions best suited for realizing mindful states remain unanswered. Prominent among these is whether a group mindfulness practice setting is more effective for novice meditators than a solitary practice setting. Answering this question has assumed new urgency due to the imposition of physical distancing measures designed to stop the spread of COVID-19. In a time of limited social contact, is a simulated group practice setting better than practicing alone? This preliminary study investigated whether environmental setting impacted mindfulness practice experience by examining the effects of three simulated meditation practice environments (1. group practice, 2. nature practice, and 3. solitary practice) on state mindfulness and perceived social connectivity in a sample of novice meditators. Significant differences emerged across the three simulated practice settings. Findings suggest watching others meditate while meditating appears to most effectively induce a state of mindfulness and strengthen feelings of social connectivity. This study supports traditional beliefs about the benefits of group mindfulness practice. These findings also have implications for social workers struggling to stretch limited resources to address growing mental health demands, especially during times of heightened social isolation due to COVID-19. If a simulated group practice confers the same cognitive benefits as solitary practice while also conferring social benefits, simulated group instruction may be preferable for therapeutic and economic reasons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10615-021-00812-0

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Group mindfulness sessions have been found to induce a state of mindfulness more effectively and strengthen social connectivity more than solitary sessions.

    “Group mindfulness sessions have been found to more effectively induce a state of mindfulness and strengthen social connectivity compared to solitary sessions,48”

    From Mechanisms of mindfulness in patients with migraine: Results of a qualitative study. (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Results (State Mindfulness and Social Connection; page not provided) report significantly greater social connectedness after video-guided group meditation than after solitary meditation. They found no significant difference in state mindfulness between those conditions (p = .77), so the claim that group sessions induced mindfulness more effectively is not supported. The study tested simulated settings with novice meditators, rather than group sessions generally. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanley, A. W., Dehili, V., Krzanowski, D., Barou, D., Lecy, N., & Garland, E. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Bethesda Hospital East (US)
  • Bellevue Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hanley, Adam W.
Venue
Clinical Social Work Journal
Published
2021-06-24
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
316-324
ISSN
  • 0091-1674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3343
OpenAlex
W3176845130
Cited by
27
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Social Work Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, group meditation, social connectedness, state mindfulness, novice meditators, COVID-19 social distancing, social isolation, mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review