Cited by 217Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet.

Digital harassment and abuse: Experiences of sexuality and gender minority adults

Open access
Powell, Anastasia, Scott, Adrian J, Henry, Nicola·2020·European Journal of Criminology

Abstract

Digital harassment and abuse refers to a range of harmful, interpersonal behaviours experienced via the internet, as well as via mobile phone and other electronic communication devices. Whereas much existing research has focused on the experiences of children and young people (including foremost ‘cyberbullying’), there have been few international studies on adult experiences of digital harassment and abuse. As such, little is currently known about the extent, nature and impacts of digital harassment and abuse on adult victims. In particular, there exists a significant gap in current research into sexual, sexuality and gender based digital harassment and abuse. This article draws on findings from a larger research project in which we surveyed 2956 Australian adults and 2842 British adults (aged 18 to 54) about their experiences of technology-facilitated sexual violence (TFSV). The data presented here focus on the experiences of sexuality diverse adults ( n = 282) who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual or heterosexual, as well as gender diverse adults ( n = 90), including women, men and transgender individuals. Results suggest that transgender individuals experience higher rates of digital harassment and abuse overall, and higher rates of sexual, sexuality and gender based harassment and abuse, as compared with heterosexual cisgender individuals. Implications of the findings are discussed with respect to policy, prevention, and future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1477370818788006

Cites

70 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Albury K, 2016, Social Media+ Society, 2
  2. Bailey J, 2014, Dalhousie Law Journal, 37, 661
  3. Bockting WO, 2014, APA Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology, 1, 739
  4. Branch K, 2017, International Journal for Cyber Criminology, 11, 128
  5. Englander E, 2015, Bullying, Teen Aggression & Social Media, 1, 19
  6. Easpaig BNG, 2011, Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 7, 168
  7. Henry N, 2016, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 34, 3637
  8. Lund EM, 2016, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1, 74
  9. Powell A, 2016, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 3691
  10. Woodlock D, 2013, DVRCV Advocate, 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Powell, A., Scott, A. J., & Henry, N.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Powell, Anastasia
Venue
European Journal of Criminology
Published
2018-07-30
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
199-223
ISSN
  • 1477-3708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2609
OpenAlex
W2885907435
Cited by
217
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP130103094)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
online harassment, online abuse, technology-facilitated sexual violence, gender-diverse adults, transgender people, cyberbullying, adult victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review