Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond Two Decades of Motivation: A Review of the Research and Practice in Instructional Design and Human Performance Technology

Hardré, Patricia L.·2003·Human Resource Development Review

Abstract

Existing models and methods of instructional design and performance improvement offer promise for enhancement in nearly every area of human resource development. However, they fall short of potential in addressing human motivation in ways that enable workplace performers and their organizations to thrive. This article reviews dominant models for instructional design and human performance technology currently in use, and compares their treatment of motivation in light of recent research in human motivation. The review illustrates an implementation gap between what research demonstrates about human motivation and what current instructional design models make available for use in workplace learning and development. It further underscores the need for a new, integrative, systemic model of motivation to aid in designing instruction by implementing recent research principles in workplace contexts. It calls for a new model of motivation for instructional design that is current, comprehensive, integrative, and flexible to meet the demands of new paradigm human resource development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534484303251661

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with a more optimistic and proactive personality are more likely to begin a difficult task and more prone to actively seek support for completing their tasks.

    “For instance, individuals with a more optimistic and proactive personality (key resources) are more likely to begin a difficult task and more prone to actively seek support for completing their tasks (Hardré, 2003).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260 · DOI
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805 · DOI
  4. Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Brougher, J.Z. (1997, March-April). Creating a nourishing learning environment for adults using multiple intelligence theory. Adult Education, 28-29. · DOI
  6. Brown, D.E. (1991). Human universals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  7. 10.1177/1059601193183003 · DOI
  8. Clark, R.E. (1997). The CANE model of motivation to learn and work: A two-stage process of goal commitment and effort. In J. Lowzck (Ed.), Trends in corporate training. Louvain, Belgium: University of Louvain Press.
  9. Clark, R.E. (2000). The cognitive sciences and human performance technology. In H.D. Stolovich & E.J. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Clark, R.E. & Estes, F. (1998). Technology or craft: What are we doing? Educational Technology, 38(5), 5-11.
  11. Deci, E.L. (1995). Why we do what we do. New York: Penguin.
  12. Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  15. 10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90013-8 · DOI
  16. Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey, J.O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
  17. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.451 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Druckman, D. & Bjork, R.A. (1994). Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  19. 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1177/0146167295213003 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gilbert, T.F. (1996). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York: McGraw-Hill. (Original work published 1978)
  22. Graham, S. & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  23. Hardre, P.L. (2001a, July). Building flexible technology skills: Concept models as instructional strategies for technological training. Performance Improvement, 40, 6. · DOI
  24. Hardre, P.L. (2001b, July). Designing effective learning environments for continuing education. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14, 3. · DOI
  25. Hardre, P.L. & Reeve, J. (in press). A motivational model of rural students’ intentions to persist in versus drop out of high school. Journal of Educational Psychology.
  26. Harless, J. (1980). An ounce of analysis is worth a pound of objectives. Newnan, GA: Harless Press.
  27. Kanfer, R. & Heggestad, E.D. (1999). Individual differences in motivation: Traits and self-regulatory skills. In P.L. Ackerman, P.C. Kyllonen, & R.D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  28. Katz, D. & Kahn, R.L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley & Sons.
  29. Keller, J.M. (1983b). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  30. Keller, J.M. (1999). Motivational systems. In H.D. Stolovich & E.J. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  31. Kouzes, J. & Posner, B. (2002). The leadership challenge (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  32. Latham, G.P. & Wexley, K.N. (2002). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  33. Lawler, E.E. III. (1994, May-June). Performance management: The next generation. Compensation & Benefits Review, 16(3), 16-19. · DOI
  34. Lawler, E.J. (1992, June). Affective attachments to nested groups: A choice-process theory. American Sociological Review, 57, 372-339. · DOI
  35. 10.1086/324071 · DOI
  36. 10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.217 · DOI
  37. Locke, E.A. & Henne, D. (1986). Work motivation theories. In C.L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of individual and organizational psychology. New York: John Wiley.
  38. 10.1007/BF00992170 · DOI
  39. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M. & Kemp, J.E. (2001). Designing effective instruction (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  40. 10.5465/amr.1986.4283922 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.472 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.603 · DOI
  43. 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.347 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Reeve, J. (1998). The interest-enjoyment distinction in intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 83-103. · DOI
  45. Reeve, J. & Deci, E.L. (1996). Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(1), 24-33. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Hardre, P.L. & Omura, M. (in press). Motivating students to learn uninteresting but important lessons. Motivation & Emotion.
  47. Reigeluth, C.M. (1999). What is instructional design theory, and how is it changing? In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  48. 10.1007/BF00991650 · DOI
  49. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.550 · DOI
  51. 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.647 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1037/0022-3514.34.6.1235 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Smith, P.L. & Ragan, T.J. (1999). Instructional design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.(Original work published 1993)
  54. Stolovich, H.D. & Keeps E.J. (1999). What is human performance technology? In H.D. Stolovich & E.J. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  55. Sullivan, J.J. (1989). Self theories and motivation. Journal of Management, 15(2), 345-363. · DOI
  56. 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.21 · DOI
  57. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley & Sons.
  59. Vroom, V.H. (1977). Can leaders learn to lead? In Fiedler, Vroom, & Argyris (Eds.), Organizational dynamics. New York: American Management Association. · DOI
  60. Vroom, V., Herzberg, F., Kovach, K.A. & Manz, C.C. (1989). Motivation. In J. Newstrom & K. Davis (Eds.), Organizational behavior: Readings and exercises (8th ed., chap. 9). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  61. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  62. Weiner, B. (1986). History of motivational research in education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 616-622. · DOI
  63. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.616 · DOI
  64. Williams, G. & Deci, E.L. (1998, August). The importance of supporting autonomy in medical education. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129, 4. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hardré, P. L.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma
Venue
Human Resource Development Review
Published
2003-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
54-81
ISSN
  • 1534-4843
  • 1552-6712
Cited by
49
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review