Cited by 105Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Review of Spiritually Based Interventions and Psychoneuroimmunological Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivorship

Open access
Hulett, Jennifer M., Armer, Jane M.·2016·Integrative Cancer Therapies

Abstract

Objective This is a review of spiritually based interventions (eg, mindfulness-based stress reduction) that utilized psychoneuroimmunological (PNI) outcome measures in breast cancer survivors. Specifically, this review sought to examine the evidence regarding relationships between spiritually based interventions, psychosocial-spiritual outcomes, and biomarker outcomes in breast cancer survivors. Methods A systematic search of 9 online databases was conducted for articles of original research, peer-reviewed, randomized and nonrandomized control trials from 2005-2015. Data were extracted in order to answer selected questions regarding relationships between psychosocial-spiritual and physiological measures utilized in spiritually based interventions. Implications for future spiritually based interventions in breast cancer survivorship are discussed. Results Twenty-two articles were reviewed. Cortisol was the most common PNI biomarker outcome studied. Compared with control groups, intervention groups demonstrated positive mental health outcomes and improved or stable neuroendocrine-immune profiles, although limitations exist. Design methods have improved with regard to increased use of comparison groups compared with previous reviews. There are few spiritually based interventions that specifically measure religious or spiritual constructs. Similarly, there are few existing studies that utilize standardized religious or spiritual measures with PNI outcome measures. Findings suggest that a body of knowledge now exists in support of interventions with mindfulness-breathing-stretching components; furthermore, these interventions appear to offer potential improvement or stabilization of neuroendocrine-immune activity in breast cancer survivors compared to control groups. Conclusion From a PNI perspective, future spiritually based interventions should include standardized measures of religiousness and spirituality in order to understand relationships between and among religiousness, spirituality, and neuroendocrine-immune outcomes. Future research should now focus on determining the minimum dose and duration needed to improve or stabilize neuroendocrine-immune function, as well as diverse setting needs, including home-based practice for survivors who are too ill to travel to group sessions or lack economic resources.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1534735416636222

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Flowchart of article identification, screening, and selection process.
Figure 1. Flowchart of article identification, screening, and selection process.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Battaglini C, 2006, Med Sportiva, 10, 49
  2. Armer JM, 2010, Lymphology, 43, 118
  3. Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group, 1999, Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research: A Report of the Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group
  4. 10.1007/s00520-011-1216-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
Hulett, J. M., & Armer, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Hulett, Jennifer M.
Venue
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Published
2016-07-26
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
405-423
ISSN
  • 1534-7354 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-695X
OpenAlex
W2346863221
Cited by
105
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Integrative Cancer Therapies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Missouri
  • University of Utah
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (T32NR013456)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
breast cancer survivorship, psychoneuroimmunology, mindfulness-based stress reduction, cortisol, home-based intervention
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Psychoneuroimmunology, Quality of Life, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Survivors, Mind-Body Therapies, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review