Cited by 93Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and careCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

Changes in the cortisol awakening response (CAR) following participation in Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in women who completed treatment for breast cancer

Matousek, Rose H., Pruessner, Jens C., Dobkin, Patricia L.·2011·Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background Changes in the cortisol awakening response (CAR) were studied in women participating in a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program after completion of their medical treatment for breast cancer.Method Thirty-three women completed questionnaires pre- and post-MBSR pertaining to: stress, depressive symptomatology, and medical symptoms. The CAR was assessed on 3 days pre- and 3 days post-MBSR as a biological marker of stress.Results A significant effect on the CAR was found, with cortisol levels showing a prolonged increase after awakening at the post-MBSR assessment period. This was accompanied by significant improvements in self-reported stress levels, depressive symptomatology, and medical symptoms. Furthermore, the change in medical symptoms was negatively correlated with the area under the curve (AUC) at study onset (r = -.52, p < .002); i.e., the greater the AUC of the CAR before MBSR, the greater the reduction in medical symptoms after the program.Conclusions These results suggest the potential usefulness of employing the CAR as a biological marker in women with breast cancer participating in an MBSR program.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctcp.2010.10.005

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matousek, R. H., Pruessner, J. C., & Dobkin, P. L.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Dobkin, Patricia L.
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
65-70
ISSN
1744-3881 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130707987
Cited by
93
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Jewish General Hospital
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Keywords
cortisol awakening response, mindfulness-based stress reduction, breast cancer survivors, depressive symptoms, clinical symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Circadian Rhythm, Depression, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Biomarkers, Meditation, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical, Area Under Curve, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review