Cited by 892Salivary Gland Disorders and FunctionsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHIV/AIDS oral health manifestations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 212 of the 212 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

T he D iagnostic A pplications of S aliva — A R eview

Kaufman, Eliaz, Lamster, Ira B.·2002·Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine

Abstract

This review examines the diagnostic application of saliva for systemic diseases. As a diagnostic fluid, saliva offers distinctive advantages over serum because it can be collected non-invasively by individuals with modest training. Furthermore, saliva may provide a cost-effective approach for the screening of large populations. Gland-specific saliva can be used for diagnosis of pathology specific to one of the major salivary glands. Whole saliva, however, is most frequently used for diagnosis of systemic diseases, since it is readily collected and contains serum constituents. These constituents are derived from the local vasculature of the salivary glands and also reach the oral cavity via the flow of gingival fluid. Analysis of saliva may be useful for the diagnosis of hereditary disorders, autoimmune diseases, malignant and infectious diseases, and endocrine disorders, as well as in the assessment of therapeutic levels of drugs and the monitoring of illicit drug use.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/154411130201300209

Cites

212 of 212 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 212 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gaudette D, North L, Hindahl M, Griffin K, Klimkow N, Thieme T (1994). Stability of clinically significant antibodies in saliva and oral fluid. J Clin Immunoassay 17:171–175.
  2. Young JA, Van Lennep EW (1978). The process of secretion of organic products. In: The morphology of salivary glands. London, UK: Academic Press, pp. 124-144.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kaufman, E., & Lamster, I. B.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
Published
2002-03
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
197-212
ISSN
  • 1045-4411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1113
OpenAlex
W2084107384
Cited by
887
References
212
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 55
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
Keywords
saliva diagnostics, whole saliva, non-invasive biomarkers, systemic disease diagnosis, salivary gland pathology, autoimmune disease, genetic disorders, cancer, infectious diseases, endocrine disorders, therapeutic drug monitoring, mass screening
MeSH terms
Animals, Autoimmune Diseases, Communicable Diseases, Hormones, Humans, Mouth Diseases, Saliva, Biomarkers, Drug Monitoring, Clinical Chemistry Tests, Genetic Diseases, Inborn

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review