Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding face matching

Fysh, Matthew C, Bindemann, Markus·2023·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

Many security settings rely on the identity matching of unfamiliar people, which has led this task to be studied extensively in Cognitive Psychology. In these experiments, observers typically decide whether pairs of faces depict one person (an identity match) or two different people (an identity mismatch). The visual similarity of the to-be-compared faces must play a primary role in how observers accurately resolve this task, but the nature of this similarity–accuracy relationship is unclear. The current study investigated the association between accuracy and facial similarity at the level of individual items (Experiments 1 and 2) and facial features (Experiments 3 and 4). All experiments demonstrate a strong link between similarity and matching accuracy, indicating that this forms the basis of identification decisions. At a feature level, however, similarity exhibited distinct relationships with match and mismatch accuracy. In matches, similarity information was generally shared across the features of a face pair under comparison, with greater similarity linked to higher accuracy. Conversely, features within mismatching face pairs exhibited greater variation in similarity information. This indicates that identity matches and mismatches are characterised by different similarity profiles, which present distinct challenges to the cognitive system. We propose that these identification decisions can be resolved through the accumulation of convergent featural information in matches and the evaluation of divergent featural information in mismatches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/17470218221104476

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is tentative evidence that the match-mismatch dissociation in face matching might be driven by similar biases to those that attenuate the mirror effect.

    “There is tentative evidence that the match-mismatch dissociation in face matching might be driven by similar biases to those that attenuate the mirror effect.”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Fysh & Bindemann, 2023

  • Biases at the stimulus level of matching tasks might merely reflect that some face pairs are easier than others, reflecting similarity of faces depicted.

    “Thus, biases at the stimulus level of matching tasks, might merely reflect that some face pairs are just easier than others, reflecting the similarity of the faces depicted (e.g., Fysh & Bindemann, 2023; for similar effects shown by somewhat increasing the distinctiveness of faces see McIntyre et al., 2013).”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Fysh & Bindemann, 2023

  • Performance for match and mismatch trials is typically unrelated or correlated negatively.

    “Contrary to this reasoning, performance for match and mismatch trials is typically unrelated or correlated negatively, whereby observers who are good at making one type of identification (e.g., that a face pair is an identity match) are poor at another (e.g., that a face pair is a mismatch; Fysh & Bindemann, 2023;Megreya & Burton, 2007;Sauerland et al., 2016).”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Fysh & Bindemann, 2023

  • Variability in criterion can explain why match and mismatch performance and old/new performance are often uncorrelated in behavioural experiments.

    “Collectively, this can explain why match and mismatch performance and old/new performance is often uncorrelated in behavioural experiments (e.g., Fysh & Bindemann, 2023;Megreya & Burton, 2007;Megreya et al., 2011;Sauerland et al., 2016).”

    From A criterion-placement theory of face matching (2026) · cites this paper as Fysh & Bindemann, 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. Abudarham N., Shkiller L., Yovel G. (2019). Critical features for face recognition. Cognition, 182, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/jcognition.2018.09.002 · DOI
  2. 10.1167/16.3.40 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/acp.2968 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.7717/peerj.1184 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/bul0000072 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/a0016368 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/scan/nsu150 · DOI
  8. 10.1186/s41235-018-0116-5 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/acp.3525 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/oso/9780198837749.003.0006 · DOI
  11. 10.1098/rsos.160321 · DOI
  12. 10.1037//0003-066X.35.2.176 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/oso/9780198837749.001.0001 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/acp.2970 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/oso/9780198837749.003.0006 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/2041669516672219 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.07.010 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1068/p7008 · DOI
  19. 10.1098/rstb.1983.0065 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · DOI
  21. 10.1080/17470218.2013.800125 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02367.x · DOI
  23. 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.3758/BF03210319 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000513 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90041-8 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01477.x · DOI
  28. 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645 · DOI
  29. Fysh M. C., 2017, Face processing: Systems, disorders and cultural differences, 1
  30. 10.1098/rsos.170249 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/bjop.12260 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.3758/BF03198438 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.546 · DOI
  34. 10.1037/0278-7393.2.1.21 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01519-9 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0379 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.005 · DOI
  40. 10.1186/s41235-018-0115-6 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/acp.3281 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193455 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.3758/BF03193433 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.3758/BF03193954 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/acp.2965 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1080/17470218.2011.575228 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1111/bjop.12318 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101260 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/oso/9780198837749.003.0006 · DOI
  51. 10.1037/lhb0000272 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.009 · DOI
  53. 10.1037/xap0000156 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.001 · DOI
  55. 10.1212/WNL.57.7.1168 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/026432999380799 · DOI
  57. 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333 · DOI
  58. 10.1037/xhp0000400 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/0956797613492986 · DOI
  60. 10.1037/a0037004 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1002/acp.3449 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1371/journal.pone.0173319 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1098/rstb.1992.0007 · DOI
  65. 10.1037/0096-3445.107.2.206 · DOI
  66. 10.1002/acp.3218 · DOI
  67. 10.1080/14640749308401045 · DOI
  68. 10.1037/xlm0000972 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1068/p7676 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1037/xap0000108 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1177/2041669519863077 · DOI
  72. 10.1002/acp.2971 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103510 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1098/rspb.2015.1292 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1093/oso/9780198837749.003.0006 · DOI
  76. 10.1037/xap0000114 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fysh, M. C., & Bindemann, M.
Affiliations
School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2022-06-17
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
862-880
ISSN
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
Cited by
8
References
2
Language
en
Funders
economic and social research council (ES/S010181/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review