Cited by 146Endometriosis Research and TreatmentReproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Biology and Fertility

Molecular Evidence for Differences in Endometrium in Severe Versus Mild Endometriosis

Open access
Aghajanova, Lusine, Giudice, Linda C.·2011·Reproductive Sciences

Abstract

Women with stage III/IV versus stage I/II endometriosis have lower implantation and pregnancy rates in natural and assisted reproduction cycles. To elucidate potential molecular mechanisms underlying these clinical observations, herein we investigated the transcriptome of eutopic endometrium across the menstrual cycle in the setting of severe versus mild endometriosis. Proliferative (PE), early secretory (ESE), and mid-secretory (MSE) endometrial tissues were obtained from 63 participants with endometriosis (19 mild and 44 severe). Purified RNA was subjected to microarray analysis using the Gene 1.0 ST Affymetrix platform. Data were analyzed with GeneSpring and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and subsequently validated. Comparison of differentially regulated genes, analyzed by cycle phase, revealed dysregulation of progesterone and/or cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-regulated genes and genes related to thyroid hormone action and metabolism. Also, members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway were observed, with the greatest upregulation of EGFR in severe versus mild disease during the early secretory phase. The extracellular matrix proteoglycan versican (VCAN), which regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis, was the most highly expressed gene in severe versus mild disease. Upregulation of microRNA 21 (MIR21) and DICER1 transcripts suggests roles for microRNAs (miRNAs) in the pathogenesis of severe versus mild endometriosis, potentially through regulation of gene silencing and epigenetic mechanisms. These observed differences in transcriptomic signatures and signaling pathways may result in poorly programmed endometrium during the cycle, contributing to lower implantation and pregnancy rates in women with severe versus mild endometriosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1933719110386241

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A microarray analysis of mild versus severe endometriosis confirmed a potential involvement of thyroid hormone homeostasis and metabolism in the pathophysiology of endometriosis.

    “A microarray analysis of mild versus severe endometriosis confirmed a potential involvement of thyroid hormone homeostasis and metabolism in the pathophysiology of endometriosis [116].”
  • This group further compared miRNA expression in women with mild and severe endometriosis and found increased endometrial expression of miR-21 and DICER in the more advanced stage of the disease.

    “This group further compared miRNA expression in women with mild and severe endometriosis and found increased endometrial expression of miR-21 and DICER in the more advanced stage of the disease [126].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [126]

  • Relatively few studies have compared miRNA expression in eutopic endometrium from women with and without surgically confirmed endometriosis.

    “In contrast to studies comparing miRNA expression in eutopic versus ectopic endometrium, relatively few studies have compared miRNA expression in eutopic endometrium from women with and without surgically confirmed endometriosis [120, 125, 126].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [126]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aghajanova, L., & Giudice, L. C.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Giudice, Linda C.
Venue
Reproductive Sciences
Published
2011-03
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
229-251
ISSN
  • 1933-7191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-7205
OpenAlex
W2146194938
Cited by
146
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD055764)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
endometriosis severity, eutopic endometrium, endometrial transcriptome, menstrual cycle, progesterone signaling, cAMP signaling, thyroid hormone metabolism, EGFR signaling, versican, extracellular matrix, miR-21, DICER1, implantation failure, miscarriage, endometrial receptivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, RNA, Messenger, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review