Cited by 90Social and Intergroup PsychologyGender Diversity and InequalityJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Is stereotype threat a useful construct for organizational psychology research and practice?

Kalokerinos, Elise K., von Hippel, Courtney, Zacher, Hannes·2014·Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

Stereotypes about different groups persist in organizations. Employees from such groups may experience stereotype threat, or the concern that they are being judged on the basis of demeaning stereotypes about groups to which they belong. The goal of this focal article is to discuss whether stereotype threat is a useful construct for organizational psychology research and practice. To this end, we focus on consequences other than acute performance deficits in laboratory settings. In particular, we examine studies that highlight the effects of stereotype threat on intrapersonal outcomes (e.g., job attitudes), interpersonal outcomes (e.g., negotiation), and on the relationship between employees and their organization. The research reviewed suggests that stereotype threat is a potentially important phenomenon in organizations, but it also highlights the paucity of research in an organizational context. We provide suggestions for future research directions as well as for the prevention and amelioration of stereotype threat in the workplace.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/iops.12167

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leadership excellence in tasks and domains relevant to leadership is often associated with stereotypically masculine traits such as rationality and agency.

    “Leadership excellence in each of these tasks and these domains is often associated with stereotypically masculine traits such as rationality and agency (Kalokerinos, von Hippel, & Zacher, 2014;Kray & Shirako, 2011).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Kalokerinos, von Hippel, & Zacher, 2014

  • In the face of chronic and acute stereotype threat, women alter their professional identities.

    “In the face of both chronic and acute stereotype threat, women have been shown to alter their professional identities (Kalokerinos, von Hippel, & Zacher, 2014).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Kalokerinos, von Hippel, & Zacher, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalokerinos, E. K., von Hippel, C., & Zacher, H.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Published
2014-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
381-402
ISSN
  • 1754-9426 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-9434
OpenAlex
W2161653948
Cited by
90
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 19
FWCI
43.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • QUT Business School
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
stereotype threat, organizational psychology, employee attitudes, negotiation, employee-organization relationship, workplace prejudice, performance deficits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review