Cited by 47Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Do Dr. Google and Health Apps Have (Comparable) Side Effects? An Experimental Study

Open access
Jungmann, Stefanie M., Brand, Sebastian, Kolb, Johanna, Witthöft, Michael·2020·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

Googling and using apps for health-related information are highly prevalent worldwide. So far, little is known about the emotional, body-related, and behavioral effects of using both Google and health-related apps. In our experimental study, bodily symptoms were first provoked by a standardized hyperventilation test. A total of 147 participants (96.6% students) were then randomly assigned to one of three conditions: Googling for the causes of the currently experienced bodily symptoms, using a medical app to diagnose the experienced symptoms, and a waiting control condition. Health-related Internet use for symptoms led to stronger negative affect, increased health anxiety, and increased need to consult a physician compared with the control condition. Googling and using the medical app showed comparable adverse emotional and behavioral effects. The findings are in line with current models of cyberchondria in which health-related Internet use represents an essential factor in maintaining and amplifying emotional distress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702619894904

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence of detrimental effects of health-related internet use, such as an increase in worries or health anxiety and an increase in the use of health care resources.

    “However, there is also evidence of detrimental effects, such as an increase in worries or (health) anxiety, and as a consequence, an increase in the use of health care resources [11,12]”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Conclusion (page not provided) reports increased health anxiety and a stronger need to see a doctor after health-related Internet use. But the Discussion (page not provided) says the study measured only the need to see a doctor, not whether participants actually consulted one. It therefore does not establish increased use of health care resources as a consequence of the anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. White, R. W., & Horvitz, E. (2009b). Experiences with web search on medical concerns and self diagnosis. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, AMIA Symposium, 2009, 696-700.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jungmann, S. M., Brand, S., Kolb, J., & Witthöft, M.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Jungmann, Stefanie M.
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2020-03
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
306-317
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W3009443450
Cited by
47
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 2
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
cyberchondria, health-related internet use, symptom checking, mobile health apps, hyperventilation, somatic symptoms, health anxiety, negative affect, physician consultation, online health information seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review