Cited by 113Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Health-related Internet habits and health anxiety in university students

Singh, Karmpaul, Brown, Richard J.·2014·Anxiety, Stress, & Coping

Abstract

Health-related Internet use has grown rapidly, yet little research has considered how health anxious individuals use the Internet for this purpose. Our aim was to examine the relationships between health anxiety and the extent of, reasons for, and consequences of health-related Internet usage in university students (n = 255). Responses on a purpose-made Internet use questionnaire were correlated with health anxiety scores; multiple regression analyses controlling for depression and anxiety were also conducted. Health anxiety positively correlated with (all ps < .01): frequency of health-related searching (r(s) = .163), proportion of health-related information sought (r(s) = .200), time spent online for health purposes (r(s) = .166), and number of searches for both illness (r(s) = .453) and wellness (r(s) = .208) information. Health anxiety further positively correlated with advantages perceived in health-related Internet use (r(s) = .183), heightened tension (r(s) = .364) and relief (r(s) = .174) post-search, and perceived doctor disadvantages (r(s) = .306), yet a greater likelihood to visit a doctor post-search (r(s) = .217). Health anxiety also correlated with six measures of possible addiction to using the Internet for health purposes (r(s) range = .171 to .366, all ps < .01). Some (including several potentially dysfunctional) aspects of health-related Internet use correlate with health anxiety. Research evaluating the possible role of Internet use in the development and maintenance of health anxiety is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615806.2014.888061

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, K., & Brown, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Singh, Karmpaul
Venue
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
Published
2014-03-03
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
542-554
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2064935992
Cited by
113
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
health anxiety, health-related internet use, university students, health information seeking, illness information, internet addiction
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Female, Habits, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Universities, Health Behavior, Internet, Young Adult, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review