Cited by 172Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The curious case of cyberchondria: A longitudinal study on the reciprocal relationship between health anxiety and online health information seeking

Open access
te Poel, Fam, Baumgartner, Susanne E., Hartmann, Tilo, Tanis, Martin·2016·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

The current study is the first to longitudinally investigate the reciprocal relationship between online health information seeking and health anxiety, i.e., cyberchondria. Expectations were that health anxious individuals who go online to find health information, experience an increase in health anxiety, which in turn will reinforce online seeking. A 4-wave longitudinal survey study among 5322 respondents aged 16-93 was conducted. Our results showed that individuals who are more health anxious than others, search online for health information more. Moreover, the results provided initial evidence for the expected reciprocal relationship between health anxiety and online health information seeking in respondents with non-clinical levels of health anxiety at the start of the study. However, this reciprocal relationship could not be found in a subsample of clinically health anxious individuals. Although for these individuals online health information seeking did not seem to exacerbate health anxiety levels, it might still serve as a maintaining factor of clinical health anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.07.009

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An illness-related bias may be relevant regarding the moderating role of emotional outcomes in cyberchondria.

    “Following TePoel et al [81], we hypothesize that an illness-related bias may be of certain relevance regarding the moderating role of emotional outcomes.”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [81]

    Section 1.1 describes an illness-related attentional bias and suggests that attending to negative online health information may fuel existing health worries. It does not address emotional outcomes as moderators, so it supports the proposed relevance of bias to cyberchondria but not that specific moderating role. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Very little research to date has examined cyberchondria and how it relates to health.

    “Although the number of internet searches for medical information likely increases every day, very little research to date has examined cyberchondria and how it relates to health.”

    From What are the Implications of Excessive Internet Searches for Medical Information by Orthopaedic Patients? (2019) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that the reciprocal relationship between online health information seeking and health anxiety over time had not been sufficiently examined. But it also identifies many earlier studies of cyberchondria that provided cross-sectional evidence, so the claim overstates the gap if it means research on cyberchondria and health generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The available studies of cyberchondria include only medically healthy participants from the community, rather than patients with symptoms.

    “The studies available [7, 9, 31, 32, 34] include only medically healthy participants from the community, rather than patients with symptoms.”

    From What are the Implications of Excessive Internet Searches for Medical Information by Orthopaedic Patients? (2019) · cites this paper as [34]

    Section 2.1 describes a representative community sample drawn from Dutch households, supporting the community-sample portion of the claim. It does not say participants were medically healthy or screened to exclude people with symptoms. Section 2.3 also reports a subgroup of 751 participants meeting the study’s threshold for clinical health anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One reviewed study showed poor quality, with an AXIS score below 10.

    “and only one study [60] showed poor quality (score b 10).”
  • In the pathological HA group, changes in an individual's HA score were not predicted by a change in health-related internet use 2 months earlier.

    “In the pathological HA group, changes in an individual’s HA score were not predicted by a change in health-related internet use 2 months earlier.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]11. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1996). Transformations, means, and confidence intervals. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 312(7038), 1079-1079.
  2. [48]48. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). MPlus User's Guide (Seventh ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
te Poel, F., Baumgartner, S. E., Hartmann, T., & Tanis, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
43
Pages
32-40
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2492112509
Cited by
172
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
21.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ellen Hamaker and Loes Keijsers for their valuable advice on the application of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cyberchondria, health anxiety, online health information seeking, bidirectional relationship, internet use
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Internet, Young Adult, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review