Cited by 162Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cyberchondria: examining relations with problematic internet use and metacognitive beliefs

Open access
Fergus, Thomas A., Spada, Marcantonio M.·2017·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Cyberchondria refers to the repeated use of the Internet to search for health-related information, which leads to negative consequences. This two-part study provides the first known examination of how cyberchondria relates to (a) problematic Internet use and (b) metacognitive beliefs. Participants were U.S. community adults who reported using the Internet to search for health-related information (Study 1: N = 337, Study 2: N = 260). In Study 1, cyberchondria shared a strong association with problematic Internet use, and that association was unaccounted for by age, gender, current reported medical status, negative affect, or health anxiety. In Study 2, cyberchondria was found to share moderate to strong associations with metacognitive beliefs. The association between cyberchondria and metacognitive beliefs about the uncontrollability of thoughts remained intact after accounting for the Study 1 covariates, as well as anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty. Neither anxiety sensitivity nor intolerance of uncertainty shared unique associations with cyberchondria. These results provide a preliminary indication that a metacognitive conceptualization of problematic Internet use may be applicable to cyberchondria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.2102

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses controlling for relevant covariates showed that negative metacognitions and obsessive-compulsive symptoms contributed significantly to the variance in cyberchondria.

    “Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses statistically controlling for relevant covariates (ie, age, gender, physical health status, HA negative affect, and anxiety sensitivity) showed that negative metacognitions (ie, uncontrollability of thoughts [22,31], beliefs about rituals [22], and beliefs about stop signals [22]) and obsessive-compulsive symptoms [22] contributed significantly to”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that hierarchical regression found significant unique variance in cyberchondria associated with metacognitive beliefs, specifically beliefs that thoughts are uncontrollable. The paper does not report significant contributions from obsessive-compulsive symptoms or beliefs about rituals or stop signals; those parts of the claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fergus and Spada concluded that cyberchondria could be viewed as a specific form of problematic internet use, indicating that concepts of problematic internet use may be relevant to understanding cyberchondria.

    “Fergus and Spada [31] concluded that cyberchondria could be viewed as a specific form of problematic internet use, indicating that concepts of problematic internet use may be of relevance to understanding cyberchondria.”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion reports a robust association between cyberchondria and problematic internet use and says that PIU conceptualizations may apply to cyberchondria. That supports the claim about the relevance of PIU concepts, but the paper does not conclude that cyberchondria is a specific form of PIU; it describes the constructs as linked and conceptually overlapping. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The relevance of metacognitive aspects for cyberchondria was supported by several results from 3 web-based questionnaire surveys using the Metacognitions Questionnaire-Health Anxiety.

    “The relevance of metacognitive aspects for cyberchondria was supported by several results from 3 web-based questionnaire surveys by the same authors [22,31], in which the Metacognitions Questionnaire–Health Anxiety (MCQ-HA; [57]) was used.”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results report that Study 2 found associations between metacognitive beliefs and cyberchondria, and the Method section confirms that it used the MCQ-HA with participants recruited online. This paper reports two studies, not three surveys, and its MCQ-HA findings come from Study 2; the cited sentence also references another source, which may account for the remaining survey. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multiple linear regression with N=337 participants showed the robustness of the relationship between cyberchondria and problematic internet use (step 2; β=.41; P<.001) after controlling for age, gender, physical health, negative affect, and health anxiety.

    “In addition, multiple linear regression with N=337 participants showed the robustness of this relationship (step 2; β=.41; P<.001) by controlling for age, gender, physical health, negative affect, and HA, where HA was the only covariate that accounted for variance in cyberchondria scores.”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In all studies, zero-order correlation analyses revealed that all metacognition subscales were significantly correlated with cyberchondria (MCQ-HA-C: rs=0.32-0.49; MCQ-HA-B: rs=0.47-0.58; MCQ-HA-U: rs=0.51-0.66).

    “In all studies, zero-order correlation analyses revealed that all metacognition subscales were significantly correlated with cyberchondria (MCQ-HA-C: rs=0.32-0.49, all P<.001; MCQ-HA-B: rs=0.47-0.58, all P<.001; and MCQ-HA-U: rs=0.51-0.66, all P<.001).”

    From Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    Study 2’s Table 2 reports significant zero-order correlations between cyberchondria and all three MCQ-HA subscales: .49 for C, .58 for B, and .66 for U (all p < .001). These match the upper ends of the cited ranges, but the paper does not establish the lower ends or the claim about “all studies”; its Study 1 examined problematic internet use rather than the MCQ-HA subscales. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Starcevic, V., & Berle, D. (2015). Cyberchondria: An old phenomenon in a new guise? In E. Aboujaoude & V. Starcevic (Eds.), Mental health in the digital age: Grave dangers, great promise (pp. 106-117). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fergus, T. A., & Spada, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • London South Bank University (GB)
Corresponding author
Fergus, Thomas A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-16
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1322-1330
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W2625380590
Cited by
162
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
15.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Open (London South Bank University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Open (London South Bank University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cyberchondria, problematic internet use, metacognitive beliefs, anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, health information seeking, health anxiety, negative affect
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Hypochondriasis, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Internet, Uncertainty, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review