The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: STEMing the Tide and Broadening Participation in STEM Careers
Open accessAbstract
Scientific advances fuel American economic competitiveness, quality of life, and national security. Much of the future job growth is projected in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, the supply of domestic students who pursue STEM careers remains small relative to the demand. On the supply side, girls and women represent untapped human capital that, if leveraged, could enhance the STEM workforce, given that they comprise 50% of the American population and more than 50% of the college-bound population. Yet the scarcity of women in STEM careers remains stark. What drives these gender disparities in STEM? And what are the solutions? Research points to different answers depending on the stage of human development. Distinct obstacles occur during three developmental periods: (a) childhood and adolescence, (b) emerging adulthood, and (c) young-to-middle adulthood. This article describes how specific learning environments, peer relations, and family characteristics become obstacles to STEM interest, achievement, and persistence in each period. Evidence-based policies and programs promise to eliminate these obstacles, increasing girls and women’s participation in STEM.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Educators can influence girls' interest in STEM by incorporating hands-on, applied learning experiences, showcasing female role models, fostering positive STEM identities, and creating informal learning environments (Dasgupta & Stout, 2014;Hughes et al., 2013).”
From Fostering students’ motivation and self-efficacy in science, technology, engineering, and design through design thinking and making in project-based learning: a gender-perspective study in primary education (2025) · cites this paper as Dasgupta & Stout, 2014
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Digest of Education Statistics
Dillow, S. A., Snyder, T. D., Snyder, T. D., Snyder, Dillow, S. A., & Thomas (1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5366 · Cited by 7,533
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Men and Women of the Corporation.
Strauss, G., & Kanter, R. M. (1978) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522922 · Cited by 7,292
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109 · Cited by 3,150
Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00239 · Cited by 1,881
Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139 · Cited by 1,732
Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians
Goldin, C. D., & Rouse, C. E. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.715 · Cited by 1,727
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
- Durik A. M., 2006, Journal of Classroom Interaction, 41, 33
- 10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573 · DOI · Paper page
- Eaton Y. M., 1991, Adolescence, 26, 565
- Frehill L. M., 2008, SWE Magazine, 54, 6
- Geist E. A., 2008, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35, 43
- Mavriplis C., 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education
- National Academies, 2010, Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching Category 5
- Stout J. G., 2013, Presentation at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613117114 · Cited by 557
Self-citationWorking toward gender diversity and inclusion in medicine: myths and solutions
Kang, S. K., & Kaplan, S. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33138-6 · Cited by 227
Understanding persistent gender gaps in STEM
Cimpian, J. R., Kim, T. H., & McDermott, Z. T. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba7377 · Cited by 199
Messages about brilliance undermine women's interest in educational and professional opportunities
Bian, L., Leslie, S., Murphy, M. C., & Cimpian, A. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.006 · Cited by 201
Starr, C. R. (2018) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684318793848 · Cited by 192
Outperforming yet undervalued: Undergraduate women in STEM
Bloodhart, B., Balgopal, M. M., Casper, A. M., McMeeking, L. B. S., & Fischer, E. V. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234685 · Cited by 184
The Gender Gap in STEM Fields: Theories, Movements, and Ideas to Engage Girls in STEM
Reinking, A., & Martin, B. (2018) · Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research · doi:10.7821/naer.2018.7.271 · Cited by 157
HIGH SCHOOL CHOICES AND THE GENDER GAP IN STEM
Card, D., & Payne, A. A. (2020) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12934 · Cited by 163
Leaper, C., & Starr, C. R. (2018) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684318806302 · Cited by 180
Mejía‐Rodríguez, A. M., Luyten, H., & Meelissen, M. R. M. (2020) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-020-10100-x · Cited by 169
Gender gap in STEM education and career choices: what matters?
Tandrayen‐Ragoobur, V., & Gokulsing, D. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-09-2019-0235 · Cited by 152
Wang, N., Tan, A., Zhou, X., Liu, K., Zeng, F., & Jiong, X. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00443-6 · Cited by 144
ASPECT: A Survey to Assess Student Perspective of Engagement in an Active-Learning Classroom
Wiggins, B. L., Eddy, S. L., Wener-Fligner, L., Freisem, K., Grunspan, D. Z., Theobald, E. J., Timbrook, J., & Crowe, A. J. (2017) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-08-0244 · Cited by 125
Thiem, K. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2022) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12085 · Cited by 142
Self-citationAdvancing Women of Color in STEM: An Imperative for U.S. Global Competitiveness
Alfred, M. V., Ray, S. M., & Johnson, M. A. (2018) · Advances in Developing Human Resources · doi:10.1177/1523422318814551 · Cited by 118
Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done?
Stewart-Williams, S., & Halsey, L. G. (2021) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/0890207020962326 · Cited by 117
Makarem, Y., & Jia, W. (2019) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21380 · Cited by 115
Knight, E. L., Jiang, Y., Rodriguez-Stanley, J., Almeida, D. M., Engeland, C. G., & Zilioli, S. (2021) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2021.01.015 · Cited by 118
Women’s Participation in Open Source Software: A Survey of the Literature
Trinkenreich, B., Wiese, I., Sarma, A., Gerosa, M. A., & Steinmacher, I. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3510460 · Cited by 106
Increasing gender diversity in the STEM research workforce
Greider, C. W., Sheltzer, J. M., Cantalupo, N. C., Copeland, W. B., Dasgupta, N., Hopkins, N. H., Jansen, J. M., Joshua‐Tor, L., McDowell, G. S., Metcalf, J. L., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz0649 · Cited by 98
Self-citationAnalysis of barriers, supports and gender gap in the choice of STEM studies in secondary education
Merayo, N., & Lanchares, A. A. (2022) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-022-09776-9 · Cited by 98
Moser, C. E., & Branscombe, N. R. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211033748 · Cited by 108
Wise psychological interventions to improve gender and racial equality in STEM
Casad, B. J., Oyler, D. L., Sullivan, E. T., McClellan, E. M., Tierney, D. N., Anderson, D. A., Greeley, P. A., Fague, M. A., & Flammang, B. J. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430218767034 · Cited by 109
Sardelis, S., & Drew, J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160015 · Cited by 90
The Liberal and Conservative Experience Across Academic Disciplines
Honeycutt, N., & Freberg, L. A. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616667617 · Cited by 89
Standal, K., Talevi, M., & Westskog, H. (2019) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101338 · Cited by 85
Kaleva, S., Pursiainen, J., Hakola, M., Rusanen, J., & Muukkonen, H. (2019) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-019-0196-x · Cited by 85
A Framework for Computational Thinking Dispositions in Mathematics Education
Pérez, A. (2018) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0424 · Cited by 97
Collaborative Learning in Engineering Education
Mercier, E., Goldstein, M. H., Baligar, P., & Rajarathinam, R. J. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003287483-23 · Cited by 87
Hall, W. M., Schmader, T., Aday, A. E., Inness, M., & Croft, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000137 · Cited by 92
What explains sex differences in math anxiety? A closer look at the role of spatial processing
Sokolowski, H. M., Hawes, Z., & Lyons, I. M. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.005 · Cited by 81
Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2022) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1 · Cited by 79
Gender Roles and Stereotypes about Science Careers Help Explain Women and Men’s Science Pursuits
Stout, J. G., Grunberg, V. A., & Ito, T. A. (2016) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0647-5 · Cited by 88
Self-citationZander, L., Höhne, E., Harms, S., Pfost, M., & Hornsey, M. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552355 · Cited by 92
Catalyzing Equity in STEM Teams: Harnessing Generative AI for Inclusion and Diversity
Nixon, N., Lin, Y., & Snow, L. E. (2024) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/23727322231220356 · Cited by 80
Fixing the Leaky Pipeline for Talented Women in STEM
Almukhambetova, A., Hernández, D., & Nam, A. (2021) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-021-10239-1 · Cited by 82
dos Santos, E. D., Albahari, A., Díaz, S., & de Freitas, E. C. (2021) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2021.1922272 · Cited by 66
Girls and computer science: experiences, perceptions, and career aspirations
Hur, J. W., Andrzejewski, C. E., & Marghitu, D. (2017) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2017.1376385 · Cited by 73
Jiang, S., & Wong, G. K. W. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12591 · Cited by 75
Almukhambetova, A., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1742948 · Cited by 64
A Model of Political Bias in Social Science Research
Honeycutt, N., & Jussim, L. J. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1722600 · Cited by 64
Sexism in childhood and adolescence: Recent trends and advances in research
Leaper, C., & Brown, C. S. (2018) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12247 · Cited by 62
Improving perceptions of STEM careers through informal learning environments
Vela, K. N., Pedersen, R. M., & Baucum, M. N. (2020) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-12-2019-0078 · Cited by 62
Donovan, B. M., Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., Edelson, D. C., & Buck Bracey, Z. E. (2019) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21502 · Cited by 60
Recognition in makerspaces: Supporting opportunities for women to “make” a STEM career
Keune, A., Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. E. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.013 · Cited by 60
Gender Perspectives on Role Models: Insights from STEM Students and Professionals
Tal, M., Lavi, R., Reiss, S. R., & Dori, Y. J. (2024) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-024-10114-y · Cited by 67
A Global Survey on the Perceptions and Impacts of Gender Inequality in the Earth and Space Sciences
Popp, A., Lutz, S. R., Khatami, S., van Emmerik, T. H. M., & Knoben, W. J. M. (2019) · Earth and Space Science · doi:10.1029/2019ea000706 · Cited by 57
Mouza, C., Pan, Y.-C., Yang, H. M., & Pollock, L. (2020) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633120905605 · Cited by 56
Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Chen, X. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00427-6 · Cited by 63
Stoeger, H., Debatin, T., Heilemann, M., & Ziegler, A. (2019) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cad.20320 · Cited by 55
Global patterns of gender disparities in STEM and explanations for their persistence
Cheryan, S., Lombard, E. J., Hailu, F., Pham, L. N. H., & Weltzien, K. (2024) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00380-3 · Cited by 65
Collaboration and Gender Equity among Academic Scientists
Misra, J., Smith‐Doerr, L., Dasgupta, N., Weaver, G., & Normanly, J. (2017) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci6010025 · Cited by 54
Self-citationMuenks, K. M., Peterson, E. G., Green, A. E., Kolvoord, R. A., & Uttal, D. H. (2019) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01072-6 · Cited by 55
Lindsay, S., & Hounsell, K. G. (2016) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2016.1229047 · Cited by 49
Science education: Adult biases because of the child’s gender and gender stereotypicality
Newall, C., Gonsalkorale, K., Walker, E., Forbes, A., Highfield, K., & Sweller, N. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.08.003 · Cited by 54
Lehman, K. J., Newhouse, K. N. S., Sundar, S., & Sax, L. J. (2022) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2022.2086401 · Cited by 50
Riegle‐Crumb, C., Morton, K., Nguyen, U., & Dasgupta, N. (2019) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/2332858419867653 · Cited by 46
Self-citationA design thinking approach to developing girls’ creative self-efficacy in STEM
Wingard, A., Kijima, R., Yang-Yoshihara, M., & Sun, K. L. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101140 · Cited by 51
Spieler, B., Oates-Indruchová, L., & Slany, W. (2020) · Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2020028567 · Cited by 46
A Cultural Psychological Model of Cross-National Variation in Gender Gaps in STEM Participation
Yalçınkaya, N. S., & Adams, G. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868320947005 · Cited by 53
Luttenberger, S., Paechter, M., & Ertl, B. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01242 · Cited by 49
Technology double gender gap in tourism business leadership
Domecq, C. F., Palomo, J., Barrio, M. D. F., & Pérez, M. S. (2020) · Information Technology & Tourism · doi:10.1007/s40558-020-00168-0 · Cited by 45
Main, J. B., Tan, L., Cox, M., McGee, E. O., & Katz, A. (2020) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20361 · Cited by 52
Creative Self-Efficacy: Why It Matters for the Future of STEM Education
Vieira, M. D. S. D. S., Kennedy, J., Leonard, S. N., & Cropley, D. H. (2024) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2024.2309038 · Cited by 56
Increasing gender diversity in engineering using soft robotics
Jackson, A., Mentzer, N., & Kramer-Bottiglio, R. K. (2021) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20378 · Cited by 43
Boosting the Sustainable Representation of Women in STEM With Evidence-Based Policy Initiatives
Moss‐Racusin, C. A., Pietri, E. S., van der Toorn, J., & Ashburn‐Nardo, L. (2021) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732220980092 · Cited by 51
Gender equity and motivational readiness for computational thinking in early childhood
Master, A., Tang, D., Forsythe, D., Alexander, T. M., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2023) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.03.004 · Cited by 53
The expanded scientific and technical human capital model: the addition of a cultural dimension
Corley, E. A., Bozeman, B. L., Zhang, X., & Tsai, C. (2017) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9611-y · Cited by 43
Franco-Orozco, C. M., & Orozco, B. F. (2018) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2018.00024 · Cited by 43
The Impacts of Gender and Subject on Experience of Competence and Autonomy in STEM
Sobieraj, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01432 · Cited by 41
Idrizi, E., Filiposka, S., & Trajkovikj, V. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-14908-x · Cited by 46
Overall, N. C., & Hammond, M. D. (2017) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732217745096 · Cited by 39
“Dear future woman of STEM”: letters of advice from women in STEM
Freedman, G., Green, M. C., Kussman, M., Drusano, M., & Moore, M. M. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00411-0 · Cited by 42
Applying Self-Determination Theory towards Motivating Young Women in Computer Science
Mishkin, A. (2019) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3287324.3287389 · Cited by 35
Luo, L., Stoeger, H., & Subotnik, R. F. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00324-w · Cited by 41
What’s in a word? On the use of metaphors to describe the careers of women academics
Moratti, S. (2018) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2018.1533927 · Cited by 36
Stoeger, H., Heilemann, M., Debatin, T., Hopp, M. D. S., Schirner, S., & Ziegler, A. (2020) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14476 · Cited by 36
Liu, A. S., & Schunn, C. D. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00247-y · Cited by 34
Griffith, E. E., & Dasgupta, N. (2018) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci7050071 · Cited by 33
Self-citationDynamics of emotion, problem solving, and identity: Portraits of three girl coders
Dahn, M., & DeLiema, D. (2020) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2020.1805286 · Cited by 33
Insight into the Organizational Culture and Challenges Faced by Women STEM Leaders in Africa
Babalola, O. O., Plessis, Y. D., & Babalola, S. S. (2021) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci10030105 · Cited by 33
Ampartzaki, M., Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Giannakou, V. (2022) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-0568-1_25 · Cited by 33
Yang, D., Wu, X., Liu, J., & Zhou, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1094959 · Cited by 39
Knight, E. L., Morales, P. J., Christian, C. B., Prasad, S., Harbaugh, W. T., Mehta, P. H., & Mayr, U. (2022) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000305 · Cited by 38
Intergroup dialogue: A justice‐centered pedagogy to address gender inequity in STEM
White, B. A., Miles, J. R., & Frantell, K. A. (2021) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21599 · Cited by 33
Good, J. J., Bourne, K. A., & Drake, R. G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104026 · Cited by 30
Galvin, D. J., Anderson, S. C., Marolf, C. J., Schneider, N. G., & Liebl, A. L. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298736 · Cited by 35
Cairns, D., & Dickson, M. (2020) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-020-00522-0 · Cited by 30
Lesperance, K., Hofer, S. I., Retelsdorf, J., & Holzberger, D. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12512 · Cited by 37
How outdoor science education can help girls stay engaged with science
Stevenson, K. T., Szczytko, R., Carrier, S., & Peterson, M. N. (2021) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2021.1900948 · Cited by 38
Do adolescents want more autonomy? Testing gender differences in autonomy across STEM
Modrek, A., Hass, R. W., Kwako, A., & Sandoval, W. A. (2021) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.09.003 · Cited by 30
Understanding the Developmental Roots of Gender Gaps in Politics
Heck, I. A., Santhanagopalan, R., Cimpian, A., & Kinzler, K. D. (2021) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2021.1930741 · Cited by 31
Musso, P., Ligorio, M. B., Ibe, E., Annese, S., Semeraro, C., & Cassibba, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879178 · Cited by 27
Faculty Experiences of the Impostor Phenomenon in STEM Fields
Chakraverty, D. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-10-0307 · Cited by 33
Diversify the syllabi: Underrepresentation of female authors in college course readings
Harris, J. K., Croston, M. A., Hutti, E. T., & Eyler, A. A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239012 · Cited by 27
Corsbie-Massay, C. L., & Wheatly, M. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2022.1027502 · Cited by 26
Wotipka, C. M., Nakagawa, M., & Svec, J. (2018) · International Journal of Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1177/0020715218780475 · Cited by 26
Mapping the Kazakhstani STEM Education Landscape: A Review of National Research
Zhumabay, N., Varis, S., Abylkassymova, A. E., Balta, N., Bakytkazy, T., & Bowen, G. M. (2024) · European Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.20897/ejsteme/15576 · Cited by 25
Bustamante-Mora, A., Diéguez, M., Díaz, J., Vázquez, E. S., & Medina-Gómez, J. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17104437 · Cited by 27
Nguyen, U., Russo‐Tait, T., Riegle‐Crumb, C., & Doerr, K. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21748 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Computing Research Association (US)
- Venue
- Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-29
- ISSN
- 2372-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-7330
- OpenAlex
- W2100971833
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 20.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1132651, 0547967)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- girls in STEM, women in STEM, gender disparities, STEM workforce, STEM education, human capital, developmental stages, childhood and adolescence, emerging adulthood, learning environment, peer relationships, family factors, STEM persistence, evidence-based programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review