The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The microbiota of an animal's intestinal tract plays important roles in the animal's overall health, productivity and well-being. There is still a scarcity of information on the microbial diversity in the gut of livestock species such as cattle. The primary reason for this lack of data relates to the expense of methods needed to generate such data. Here we have utilized a bacterial tag-encoded FLX 16s rDNA amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) approach that is able to perform diversity analyses of gastrointestinal populations. bTEFAP is relatively inexpensive in terms of both time and labor due to the implementation of a novel tag priming method and an efficient bioinformatics pipeline. We have evaluated the microbiome from the feces of 20 commercial, lactating dairy cows. RESULTS: Ubiquitous bacteria detected from the cattle feces included Clostridium, Bacteroides, Porpyhyromonas, Ruminococcus, Alistipes, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, Lachnospira, Enterococcus, Oscillospira, Cytophage, Anaerotruncus, and Acidaminococcus spp. Foodborne pathogenic bacteria were detected in several of the cattle, a total of 4 cows were found to be positive for Salmonella spp (tentative enterica) and 6 cows were positive for Campylobacter spp. (tentative lanienae). CONCLUSION: Using bTEFAP we have examined the microbiota in the feces of cattle. As these methods continue to mature we will better understand the ecology of the major populations of bacteria the lower intestinal tract. This in turn will allow for a better understanding of ways in which the intestinal microbiome contributes to animal health, productivity and wellbeing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prevotella, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia and Clostridium are consistently identified in fecal samples from ruminants and are considered part of the core microbiota (Dowd et al., 2008; Durso et al., 2012).”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Dowd et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669 · cited 2×
“The resulting TC FASTA for each sample was then evaluated using BLASTn [77] against a custom database derived from the RDP-II database [78] and GenBank http://ncbi.”
MethodAn obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ley, R. E., Mahowald, M. A., Magrini, V., Mardis, E. R., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05414 · Cited by 12,444 · cited 1×
“Results and Discussion Recent research related to host physiology (obesity) and the gastrointestinal bacterial populations have sparked a renewed interest in understanding the gut microbiome [26,27].”
BackgroundHuman gut microbes associated with obesity
Ley, R. E., Turnbaugh, P. J., Klein, S., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4441022a · Cited by 8,785 · cited 1×
“Results and Discussion Recent research related to host physiology (obesity) and the gastrointestinal bacterial populations have sparked a renewed interest in understanding the gut microbiome [26,27].”
BackgroundDiversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial Flora
Eckburg, P. B., Bik, E. M., Bernstein, C. N., Purdom, E., Dethlefsen, L., Sargent, M., Gill, S. R., Nelson, K. E., & Relman, D. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1110591 · Cited by 7,913 · cited 1×
“Information on microbial diversity within the gastrointestinal tract of humans has increased in recent years as a result of 16S rDNA-based analyses [9,10], yet similar data on the microbiomes of livestock is lacking [11,12].”
BackgroundFood-Related Illness and Death in the United States
Mead, P. S., Slutsker, L., DIETZ, V. J., McCaig, L. F., Bresee, J., Shapiro, C. A., Griffin, P. M., & Tauxe, R. V. (1999) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0505.990502 · Cited by 7,305
CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program
Huang, X., & Madan, A. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · Cited by 5,261 · cited 3×
“The ace files generated by CAP3 were then processed to generate a secondary FASTA file containing the tentative consensus (TC) sequences of the assembly along with the number of reads integrated into each consensus.”
MethodInfluentialEcological and Evolutionary Forces Shaping Microbial Diversity in the Human Intestine
Ley, R. E., Peterson, D. A., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017 · Cited by 3,358 · cited 1×
“Information on microbial diversity within the gastrointestinal tract of humans has increased in recent years as a result of 16S rDNA-based analyses [9,10], yet similar data on the microbiomes of livestock is lacking [11,12].”
BackgroundHungate, R. E. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-12555-x · Cited by 3,060
Bacteroides : the Good, the Bad, and the Nitty-Gritty
Wexler, H. M. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00008-07 · Cited by 2,388
Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis
von Wintzingerode, F., Göbel, U. B., & Stackebrandt, E. S. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00351.x · Cited by 2,085
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
Czinnerová, M., Stejskal, V., Marková, K., Nosek, J., Říha, J., & Ševců, A. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136640 · Cited by 6
Powell, C. M., Hail, D., Potocnjak, J., Hanson, J. D., Halbert, S. H., & Bextine, B. R. (2014) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00284-014-0709-2 · Cited by 6
Prober, S. M., Bissett, A. B., Walker, C., Wiehl, G., McIntyre, S., & Tibbett, M. (2014) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-014-0587-2 · Cited by 6
Lactic Acid Bacteria in Animal Production and Health
Bouchard, D. S., Even, S., & Loir, Y. L. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118868386.ch9 · Cited by 7
An introduction to metagenomic data generation, analysis, visualization, and interpretation
Singh, B., Crippen, T. L., & Tomberlin, J. K. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119062585.ch5 · Cited by 8
Cicala, F., Cisterna-Céliz, J. A., Paolinelli, M., Moore, J. D., Sevigny, J. L., & Rocha‐Olivares, A. (2022) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-022-01970-5 · Cited by 5
Huang, Y., Jonsson, N. N., McLaughlin, M., Burchmore, R., Johnson, P., Jones, R. O., McGill, S., Brady, N., Weidt, S. K., & Eckersall, P. D. (2023) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2023.104941 · Cited by 4
“This was similar to findings in previous genomic studies [42], which showed that Clostridium was the most abundant bacterial genus in bovine faeces, and reported the same gene enrichment order of the five genera as our findings except that Bacteroides were more abundant than Prevotella .”
Bagagnan, S., Guérin-Rechdaoui, S., Marconi, A., Rocher, V., Gıustı-Mıller, S., Moilleron, R., & Jusselme, M. D. (2024) · Aquatic Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10452-024-10124-3 · Cited by 5
“Bacteroidota , commontly found in human intestines (Dowd et al. 2008; Shanks et al. 2011), may indicate the influence of excessive faecal matter and contaminant accumulation from high population density areas in the Paris conurbation.”
Santos, T. L. D., Favaretto, J. A., Brunetto, A. L. R., Zatti, E., Marchiori, M. S., Pereira, W. A. B., Bajay, M. M., & da Silva, A. S. (2024) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation10100528 · Cited by 5
Excretion patterns of Campylobacter jejuni by dairy cows
Rapp, D., Ross, C., & Cave, V. M. (2018) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2018.1447974 · Cited by 5
“The commensal microbiota in the gut has been found to be cow-specific (Dowd et al. 2008) and variable in time (Rudi et al. 2012), hence the extent to which the competition by the natural bovine intestinal microbiota mediates the long-term persistence of C. jejuni in the bovine host warrants further…”
BackgroundSingh, Y., Rani, J., Kushwaha, J., Priyadarsini, M., Pandey, K. P., Sheth, P. N., Yadav, S. K., Mahesh, M. S., & Dhoble, A. S. (2023) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/s11250-023-03691-4 · Cited by 5
“Generally, researchers used genomic techniques such as metagenomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, to evaluate the diversity of microorganisms found in cattle dung and the genetic expression of protein variation (Ozutsumi et al. 2005; Dowd et al. 2008).”
BackgroundCaguazango, J. C., & Pazos, A. J. (2019) · Biomédica · doi:10.7705/biomedica.v39i4.4520 · Cited by 5
“Las lecturas tamizadas se agruparon en unidades taxonómicas operativas con una divergencia del 3 % (97 % de similitud), seguidas por la eliminación de las secuencias de única instancia (singleton) y las quimeras (15,16).”
BackgroundAnika, O. C., Akin-Osanaiye, B. C., & Edet, U. O. (2020) · Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology and Food Sciences · doi:10.15414/jmbfs.2020.9.5.965-969 · Cited by 5
“In our study, the abundance of these genuses Clostridium, Uncultured rumen bacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Prevotella confirms their hydrolytic roles in our cellulose rich substrate (Dowd et al., 2008; Callaway et al., 2010).”
BackgroundHanlon, K. E., McCann, J. C., Miller, M. F., Brashears, M. M., Smith, C. L., Brooks, J. C., & Legako, J. F. (2021) · Meat and Muscle Biology · doi:10.22175/mmb.11711 · Cited by 5
“While culture-based methods are standard in the meat industry, these methods overestimate bacterial species that are easily culturable and may miss the opportunity to represent thosewith no successful culturingmethods (Dowd et al., 2008; Jarvis et al., 2018).”
BackgroundAnimal Waste: An Environmentally Sustainable Management Approach
Nweze, J. A., Gupta, S., Akor, J., Nwuche, C. O., Nweze, J. E., & Unah, U. V. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26224-1_1 · Cited by 5
Zalewská, B., Kaevska, M., & Slaná, I. (2017) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00284-017-1366-z · Cited by 5
“[6], and a modified protocol according to Baldrian et al.”
MethodRubino, C. V., Katz, B. G., Langlois, K., Wang, H. H., Carrion, J. A., Walker, S. G., Collier, J. L., Iacono, V. J., & Myneni, S. R. (2021) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/clr.13787 · Cited by 5
Rojas-Herrera, R. A., Ramos-Castillo, A. S., Estrada‐Medina, H., Santos-Briones, C. D. L., Keb-Llanes, M. A., Medina, R. C. B., Peña-Ramírez, Y. J., & O’Connor-Sánchez, A. (2014) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-014-0969-x · Cited by 5
“Bacterial tagencoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) was performed as described previously using Gray28F (5'-TTTG ATCNTGGCTCAG-3') and Gray519R (5'-GTNTTACNGC GGCKGCTG-3') primers (Dowd et al. 2008).”
MethodZhao, L., Tyler, P. J., Starnes, J., Rankins, D. L., McCaskey, T. A., & Wang, L. (2013) · Foodborne Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1089/fpd.2013.1587 · Cited by 5
“Cattle’s gastrointestinal (GI) tracts contain complex bacterial communities (Dowd et al., 2008).”
Shen, Z. (2016) · Journal of Data Mining in Genomics & Proteomics · doi:10.4172/2153-0602.1000186 · Cited by 5
“Seventy-three genera of bacteria (Table 1) were selected for this study as they are generally considered to be dominant in human and animal intestinal tracts [26-28].”
BackgroundRapp, J. Z. (2014) · Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) · Cited by 5
Erram, D. (2016) · K-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) · Cited by 5
Diversity of Microbiomes in Beef Cattle
Durso, L. M., Wells, J. E., & Kim, M. S. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7475-4_730 · Cited by 5
Microbially Influenced Corrosion in Epoxy‐Ceramic Coated Carbon‐Steel Cooler
Hlaváčková, V., Koutnı́k, P., Liskova, K., Čmelík, J., Říha, J., Stoulil, J., & Ševců, A. (2025) · Materials and Corrosion · doi:10.1002/maco.202414671 · Cited by 4
“The obtained DNA was subjected to amplicon sequencing of the variable V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, the region being amplified using the universal primers 530F (5 ′‐ GTGCCAGCMGCNGCGG ‐ 3 ′ ) and 802R (5 ′‐ TACNVGGGTATCTAATCC ‐ 3 ′ ) [52, 53].”
Anagnostopoulos, D. A., Karamani, E. A., Letsiou, S., Tsiartsafis, A., Chatzimpyrou, N., Boziaris, I. S., Kakagianni, M. N., & Parlapani, F. F. (2025) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2025.117552 · Cited by 4
Niche for high abundant extremophilic microbial communities in an ancient crater
Albokari, M., Al‐Najjar, M. A. A., Mashhour, I., & Huraysi, A. A. (2017) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550417000295 · Cited by 4
Terrestrial Toxicity of Synthetic Gas-to-Liquid versus Crude Oil–Derived Drilling Fluids in Soil
Westbrook, L. A., Chase, D. A., Mudge, J. F., Hughes, S., Lyon, D. Y., Dong, M., Carr, D. L., & Anderson, T. A. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4658 · Cited by 4
“These methods are based on the Roche 454 FLX pyrosequencing platform (Dowd et al. 2008).”
Li, X., Khan, I., Han, R., Huang, G., Xia, W., Yin, L., Leong, W. K., Su, L., Law, B. Y. K., Wong, V. K. W., et al. (2024) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2024.156101 · Cited by 4
Min, B. R., Lourençon, R. V., Nagaraju, I., Pitta, D., Ismael, H., Abdo, H., Chaudhary, S., Hilaire, M., Kanyi, V., Solaiman, S. G., et al. (2025) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf260 · Cited by 4
Potential Fungal Pathogens of Mead's Milkweed (Asclepias meadii: Apocynaceae)
Brown, G. K., Herrera, J., Bernhardt, P., & Edens-Meier, R. (2015) · Natural Areas Journal · doi:10.3375/043.035.0413 · Cited by 4
“Utilizing the Roche Titanium 454 FLX pyrosequencing platform and methods described by Dowd et al. (2008), with slight modification for fungal study, standardized DNA was amplified and sequenced using fungal specific emulsion PCR and fungal tag encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (f0TEFAP).”
MethodInfluentialKarayanni, H., Meziti, A., Spatharis, S., Genitsaris, S., Courties, C., & Kormas, K. A. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5020031 · Cited by 4
“For amplicon pyrosequencing, bacterial (27F, 5′-AGRGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3; 519R, 5′-GTNTTACNGCGGCKGCTG-3′) and archaeal (ARC349F, 5′-GYGCASCAGKCGMGAAW-3′; ARC915R, 5′-GTGCTCCCCCGCCAATTCCT-3′) primers were used as previously described [19].”
MethodWang, J. C., Pillutla, P., Cordero, J., & Hamood, A. N. (2018) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.08.035 · Cited by 4
Bacterial dysbiosis predicts the diagnosis of Crohn's disease in Saudi children
Mouzan, M. I. E., Winter, H. S., Sarkhy, A. A. A., Korolev, K. S., Menon, R., & Assiri, A. A. (2021) · Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.4103/sjg.sjg_409_20 · Cited by 5
“Amp l i con pyrosequencing (bTEFAP®) was used and the primers 515F GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA and 806R GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT were utilized to assess the microbiome using the Illumina MiSeq with a methodology based upon the bTEFAP® following manufacturer’s protocol, producing sequences deep enough for comparison purposes.[15,1…”
MethodRothäusler, E., Dobretsov, S., Gomez, M. F., Madariaga, D. J., Thiel, M., Véliz, K., & Tala, F. (2022) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105708 · Cited by 4
Ormeño, M. A., Maldonado, J. E., González, M., Silva, H., & Covarrubias, J. I. (2023) · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition · doi:10.1007/s42729-023-01228-0 · Cited by 4
“The 16S rRNA amplicons were analyzed following standard processing methods (Dowd et al. 2008; Handl et al. 2011).”
MethodRabee, A. E., Lamara, M., & Ishaq, S. L. (2023) · Biofuels · doi:10.1080/17597269.2023.2238381 · Cited by 4
“On the other hand, previous studies on bacterial communities of cattle feces [15,16] indicated that the bacterial community was dominated by phylum Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes; and the dominant genera were Ruminococcus , Fibrobacter , Clostridium , Bacteroides , Porpyhyromonas , Alistipes ,…”
BackgroundPu, S., Wang, M., Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Ma, X., Wang, R., Yu, S., Wang, L., & Pan, Y. (2023) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-023-09712-8 · Cited by 4
“The 16 S universal Eubacterial primers 530 F (5 ′ -GTG CCA GCMGCNGCGG-3 ′ )-1100R (5 ′ -GGGTTNCGNTCG TTG -3 ′ ) described by Dowd et al. [31], was selected and commonly used in earlier literature.”
MethodTyler, H. L., Haron, M. H., Pugh, N. D., Jin, Z., Jackson, C. R., & Pasco, D. S. (2016) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/c6fo00562d · Cited by 4
Buccella, C., Alvarez, B., Gibb, K. S., & Padovan, A. C. (2014) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf13254 · Cited by 5
In vitro examination of the application of saline concentrate to septic tank wastewater
Sigala, J., Stringam, B. L., & Unc, A. (2017) · Sustainable Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s40899-017-0089-4 · Cited by 4
“BLASTn was performed using a custom curated GreenGenes database at MRDNA (Dowd et al. 2008).”
MethodInfluentialKarayanni, H., Kormas, K. A., Moustaka-Gouni, M. T., & Sommer, U. J. (2019) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d11100195 · Cited by 4
IMPACT OF DIET COMPOSITION ON RUMEN BACTERIAL PHYLOGENETICS
Petri, R. M. (2013) · HARVEST (University of Saskatchewan) · Cited by 4
Krueger, W. K. (2009) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · Cited by 4
Kataev, V., Sleptsov, I. I., Martynov, A. A., Aduchiev, B. K., Khlopko, Y. A., Miroshnikov, S. A., Sv, C., & Plotnikov, A. O. (2020) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.106407 · Cited by 4
Abdel-Wahab, M. A., Bahkali, A. H., Elgorban, A. M., & Jones, G. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-539541/v1 · Cited by 4
“A secondary PCR was performed for FLX (Roche, Nutley, New Jersey) amplicon sequencing under the same condition by using designed special fusion primers with different tag sequences as: LinkerA-Tags-530F and LinkerB-1100R (Dowd et al. 2008a,b).”
MethodKaksonen, A., Wylie, J., Morgan, M. J., Walsh, T., Tjandraatmadja, G., Barry, K., Gonzalez, D., Goodman, N., Vanderzalm, J., Dillon, P., et al. (2024) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2024.122989 · Cited by 3
Mutambara, P., & Nkongolo, K. K. C. (2025) · Ecological Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.egg.2025.100382 · Cited by 3
Hao, A., Xia, D., Mou, X., Kobayashi, S., Haraguchi, T., Iseri, Y., & Zhao, M. (2025) · Water · doi:10.3390/w17152222 · Cited by 3
Pérez-Ramos, D. W., & Caragata, E. P. (2025) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1648091 · Cited by 4
Characterization of Bacterial Communities in Volcanic Soil from Northern Patagonian Area of Chile
Aguila‐Torres, P., González, M., Hernández, M., Aguado‐Norese, C., Maldonado, J. E., Miranda, R. M., González‐Stegmaier, R., Palma, D. E., Rojas, L. A., & Mellado, M. (2025) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms13112519 · Cited by 3
“Raw 16S ribosomal amplicon sequences were processed and filtered with protocols described by [29,30] using the software Mothur v.1.22.2 [31].”
InfluentialShotgun Metagenomics Reveals Microbial Diversity, Resistome, and Plasmidome in Dairy Cattle Feces
Shehla, S., Obaid, M. K., Niaz, S., Khan, M. A., Ahmad, A. A., Abdel-Maksoud, M. A., Alamri, A., Alrokayan, S., Shoaib, M., Shams, S., et al. (2026) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci13030275 · Cited by 3
“Metagenomic analysis of fecal samples from dairy cattle has been previously documented [32–34].”
Fu, Z., Antwi, J., Sword, G. A., Barman, A. K., & Medina, R. F. (2021) · Southwestern Entomologist · doi:10.3958/059.046.0102 · Cited by 3
Hussein, W., Cholewińska, P., Wojnarowski, K., Szeligowska, N., Hu, F., Greguła‐Kania, M., Rojtinnakorn, J., & Palić, D. (2024) · Microbiology Research · doi:10.3390/microbiolres15040149 · Cited by 3
Anagnostopoulos, D. A., Martsikalis, P. V., Syropoulou, F., Parlapani, F. F., Polymeros, K., Barkas, D., Papaharisis, L., Antonopoulou, S., & Boziaris, I. S. (2024) · The Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.microb.2024.100222 · Cited by 3
Min, B. R., Uyeno, Y., Ismael, H., Abdo, H., Chaudhary, S., Hilaire, M., & Kanyi, V. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15050664 · Cited by 3
“Data quality control and analyses were directed as described by Dowd et al. [29] and Min et al. [21,30].”
RetractedBioDry: An Inexpensive, Low-Power Method to Preserve Aquatic Microbial Biomass at Room Temperature
Tuorto, S. J., Brown, C. M., Bidle, K. D., McGuinness, L. R., & Kerkhof, L. J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144686 · Cited by 3
Vieira, E. A., Abrão, F. O., Ribeiro, I. C. O., Nigri, A. C. D. A., da Silva, K. F., Careli, R. T., Geraseev, L. C., & Duarte, E. R. (2015) · Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira · doi:10.1590/s0100-736x2015000900007 · Cited by 3
Stockler, R. M., Higgins, K. V., Hallowell, H. A., Groover, E. S., Hiltbold, E. M., Newcomer, B. W., & Walz, P. H. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.601874 · Cited by 3
Morin, L., Bissett, A. B., & van Klinken, R. D. (2021) · Phytobiomes Journal · doi:10.1094/pbiomes-04-21-0027-r · Cited by 3
Waldrip, H. M., Parker, D. B., Miller, S. N., Durso, L. M., Min, B. R., Miller, D. N., Casey, K. D., Woodbury, B. L., & Spiehs, M. J. (2022) · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment · doi:10.1002/agg2.20292 · Cited by 3
Zhu, D., Xie, T., Du, R., & Guo, L. J. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12223097 · Cited by 3
“, its diversity) could influence the changes in SCFA quantity and proportion [35].”
BackgroundProkaryotic Diversity and Dynamics during Dinoflagellate Bloom Decays in Coastal Tunisian Waters
Lajnef, R., Quéméneur, M., Abdennadher, M., Walha, L. D., Hamza, A., Hassen, M. B., & Zouari, A. B. (2023) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d15020273 · Cited by 3
“8S-ITS2) regions and the D1–D3 region of the large subunit (LSU) of the ribosomal DNA (28S rDNA) were amplified using PCR with the primer sets ITS1F/ITS1R [41,42] and D1R/D3ca [43], respectively.”
Kim, H. W., Kim, N. K., Thompson, J., de Jesus, M., Rehberger, J. M., Rehberger, T. G., Smith, A. H., & Mackie, R. I. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1107964 · Cited by 3
Mori-Bazzano, L., Nguyen, N. H. A., Ševcu, A., Říha, J., Fu, T.-T., Slaveykova, V. I., & Ibelings, B. (2025) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179615 · Cited by 2
Morales‐Hidalgo, M., Povedano‐Priego, C., Martinez-Moreno, M. F., Černá, K., Liskova, K., Říha, J., Valdivieso, P., Alonso, Ú., Fernández, A. M., Jroundi, F., et al. (2025) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138915 · Cited by 3
Towards the selection of a produced water enrichment for biological gas hydrate inhibitors
Wilson, S. L., Voordouw, G., & Walker, V. K. (2014) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-2912-x · Cited by 3
“Amplicons were also sequenced (tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing) at the RTL using a Roche 454 FLX instrument and titanium reagents using RTL protocols (Dowd et al. 2008).”
MethodXia, C., Kumar, A., Chen, X., Tucker, M. P., & Liang, Y. (2017) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-017-0239-9 · Cited by 3
Ellis, R. J., & McSweeney, C. S. (2015) · ASM Press eBooks · doi:10.1128/9781555818821.ch4.4.3 · Cited by 4
Acetate Additions Stimulate CO 2 and CH 4 Production from Urban Wetland Soils
Brigham, B. A., Montero, A. D., O'Mullan, G. D., & Bird, J. A. (2018) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2018.01.0034 · Cited by 3
Common Methods to Understand and Develop Indigenous Probiotics Yeast for Ruminant
Ghazanfar, S., Riaz, A., Ali, G. M., Naveed, S., Arif, I., Irshad, S., Riaz, N., & Manzoor, K. N. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.82731 · Cited by 3
Investigating the effect of biochar on microbial activities and biological processes in soil
Abujabhah, I. S. (2017) · UTAS Research Repository · doi:10.25959/23238881 · Cited by 3
Lactic acid fermentation of human excreta for agricultural application
Andreev, N. (2017) · doi:10.18174/401835 · Cited by 3
Resistant starch inhibits high-fat diet-induced oncogenic responses in the colon of C57BL/6 mice
Zeng, H., Safratowich, B. D., Liu, Z., & Bukowski, M. R. (2025) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2025.109838 · Cited by 4
Sawicki, T. R., Cannizzaro, A. G., & Dowd, S. E. (2025) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-025-03644-y · Cited by 2
“Sequencing was performed at MR DNA (Molecular Research LP; MR DNA, Shallowater, Texas, USA; www. mrdna lab. com ) on a MiSeq following the manufacturer’s guidelines using their universal amplicon sequencing service (bTEFAP(R) (Dowd, et al. 2008), with the primers 18SCrang660F and 18SCrang1025R.”
PPARα deficiency causes skin dysbiosis and triggers innate immunity in keratinocytes
Blunder, S., Minzaghi, D., Pavel, P., Berktold, M., Hermann, M., Ploner, C., Schöpf, C., Marx, F., & Dubrac, S. (2026) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-026-08640-1 · Cited by 2
“Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were de fi ned after removal of singleton sequences, clustering at 3% divergence (97% similarity) [15 – 18].”
Černá, K., Mukhtar, S. S., Bureš, R., Alfaro‐Espinoza, G., Koerdt, A., Říha, J., Hlaváčková, V., & Stoulil, J. (2026) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-026-05039-0 · Cited by 2
“For samples with low DNA concentration (< 0.5 ng·µL − 1 ) and high Cq (> 18), a two-step PCR was performed using universal and barcoded fusion primers 515 F (Dowd et al. 2008) and 802R (Claesson et al. 2010) targeting the hypervariable V4 region of the 16 S rRNA gene of both Bacteria and Archaea.”
InfluentialMetagenomics of the human microbiome
Shestakov, S. (2011) · Biology Bulletin Reviews · doi:10.1134/s2079086411020095 · Cited by 2
Bakhoum, N., Humm, E. A., Khan, N., & Hirsch, A. M. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/cjm-2024-0031 · Cited by 2
Šefl, V., Shrestha, R., & Prošek, T. (2024) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met14101098 · Cited by 2
Callaway, T. R., Perez, H. G., Corcionivoschi, N., Bu, D., & Fluharty, F. L. (2024) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25847 · Cited by 3
A preliminary study on farmed and free-ranging mouflons core microbiome
Smoliński, J., Czyż, K., Kleszcz, A., Trusz, A., Wyrostek, A., & Zajfert, K. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-05443-w · Cited by 2
Coprophilic dipteran community associated with horse dung in Malaysia
Kurahashi, H., Hayashi, T., & Pahang, J. (2015) · Cited by 2
Casey, C. L., Hernandez, S. M., Yabsley, M. J., Smith, K. F., & Sánchez, S. (2013) · Journal of Herpetological Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.5818/1529-9651-23.3.74 · Cited by 2
Preut, M. C. (2014) · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) · Cited by 2
Changes in the rumen bacterial microbiome of cattle exposed to ponderosa pine needles
Welch, K. D., Stonecipher, C. A., Gardner, D. R., Cook, D., & Pfister, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2016.1228 · Cited by 2
Cattle Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota in Health and Disease
Dias, A. L. G., & Ametaj, B. N. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43033-1_5 · Cited by 2
Mijnendonckx, K., Monsieurs, P., Černá, K., Hlaváčková, V., Steinová, J., Burzan, N., Bernier‐Latmani, R., Boothman, C., Miettinen, H., Kluge, S., et al. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818695-4.00004-6 · Cited by 2
Potential for Passive Treatment of Coal Mine-derived Acid Mine Drainage in Abandoned Stream Channels
Sharma, S., Wander, N. J., Ryan, W. G., Lautzenheiser, M., Cutright, T. J., & Senko, J. M. (2021) · Mine Water and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10230-021-00812-z · Cited by 2
“2010b; Edgar 2010; Quast et al.”
Bacterial Diversity in Calcium Carbonate Paleo Accretions (Tosca) in the Southern Pampas, Argentina
Pesciaroli, C., Purswani, J., Mestelan, S. A., Lett, L., Portela, G., Médici, S., Morillo, J. A., Pozo, C., González-López, J., & Rivadeneyra, M. A. (2021) · Geomicrobiology Journal · doi:10.1080/01490451.2021.1968980 · Cited by 2
Husseneder, C., Bhalerao, D. R., & Foil, L. D. (2022) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.4157 · Cited by 2
Rose, A. M., Padovan, A. C., Christian, K. A., Kaestli, M., McGuinness, K. A., Tsoukalis, S., & Gibb, K. S. (2019) · Water · doi:10.3390/w11112422 · Cited by 2
Sequence‐Based Characterization of Microbiomes by Serial Analysis of Ribosomal Sequence Tags (SARST)
Yu, Z., & Morrison, M. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118010518.ch31 · Cited by 2
Early Gut Microbiome and Polymicrobial Infection
Stewart, C. J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6418-1_798-1 · Cited by 2
Characterisation of mixed microbial populations in white mineral dispersions
Maiuta, N. D. (2026) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · doi:10.82444/warw.33490585 · Cited by 2
Koo, H., & Bej, A. K. (2015) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2015.11.040 · Cited by 2
Emerson, D., Scott, J. J., Leavitt, A., Fleming, E. J., & Moyer, C. L. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/095414 · Cited by 2
Comparative metagenomic analysis of small ruminants' fecal microbiotaPreprint
Shabana, I., Bouqellah, N. A., & Albakri, N. N. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.2.21081/v1 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowd, S. E., Callaway, T. R., Wolcott, R. D., Sun, Y., McKeehan, T., Hagevoort, R. G., & Edrington, T. S.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dowd, Scot E
- Venue
- BMC Microbiology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125
- ISSN
- 1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2515157
- OpenAlex
- W2105807803
- Cited by
- 1,121
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 116 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 129 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 11.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- fecal microbiota, bacterial diversity, dairy cattle, Clostridium, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Lachnospiraceae, foodborne pathogens, Salmonella, Campylobacter, gut microbiota
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteria, Cattle, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Feces, Female, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gastrointestinal Tract, Biodiversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review