Cited by 92Child and Adolescent HealthChild Nutrition and Water AccessEarly Childhood Education and Development

Systematic review of parenting interventions in European countries aiming to reduce social inequalities in children’s health and development

Open access
Morrison, Joana, Pikhart, Hynek, Ruiz, Milagros, Goldblatt, Peter·2014·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early child development influences many aspects of wellbeing, health, competence in literacy and numeracy, criminality, and social and economic participation throughout the life course. Children from disadvantaged groups have less possibilities of achieving full development. By providing a positive start for all children across the social gradient, improved developmental outcomes will be seen during later childhood and throughout their lives. The objective of this systematic review was to identify interventions during early childhood in countries from the World Health Organisation European Region in 1999-2013 which reduced inequalities in children's health and development. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. The review examined universal, targeted and proportionate universalism interventions, programs and services using an electronic search strategy in PubMed and the International Bibliography of the Social Sciences [IBSS] databases. A further search was performed in the grey literature. Interventions were included only if they were aimed at children or their parents and had been evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 23 interventions in total: 6 in the PubMed data base, 5 in IBSS and 12 in grey literature. All but 1 intervention-delivered in Sweden-were carried out in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. These aimed to improve parenting abilities, however, some had additional components such as: day-care provision, improving housing conditions and speech or psychological therapies. Programmes offering intensive support, information and home visits using a psycho-educational approach and aimed at developing parent's and children's skills showed more favourable outcomes. These were parenting behaviours, overall children's health and higher level of fine motor skills and cognitive functioning. Child injuries and abuse were also reduced. Two interventions were universally proportionate and all others were aimed at a specific target population. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions with better outcomes and a higher level of evidence combined workshops and educational programmes for both parents and children beginning during early pregnancy and included home visits by specialised staff. Further evaluation and publication of early years interventions should be carried out also within a wider range of countries than just the UK and Ireland.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1040

Cites

66 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reviews included did not identify interventions following the objective of flattening the social gradient.

    “Reviews included also did not identify interventions following this objective ?(54-56).”

    From Theoretical and practical challenges of proportionate universalism: a review (2020) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Discussion (page not available) says nearly all identified interventions targeted deprived or at-risk groups and were not aimed at levelling the social gradient. But it also identifies two interventions with a proportionate universal approach, so it does not establish that none followed the stated objective. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [29]World Health Organisation Review of Social Determinants and the Health Divide in the WHO European Region 2013 Copenhagen Institute of Health Equity, University College London and the WHO Regional Office for Europe
  2. [49]Melhuish EC A Literature Review of the Impact of Early Years Provision Upon Young Children 2004 London National Audit Office
  3. [58]The Commission to Reduce Social Inequalities in Health in Spain A proposal of policies and interventions to reduce social inequalities in health in Spain. Commission to reduce social inequalities in health in Spain Gac Sanit / SESPAS 2012 26 2 182 189 22112713
  4. [59]Rough E Goldblatt P Marmot M Nathansona V BMA Science and Education department and the Board of Science UK Chapter 3: Inequalities in Child Health Growing Up in the UK: Ensuring a Healthy Future for our Children 2013 37 56
  5. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1040/prepub

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrison, J., Pikhart, H., Ruiz, M., & Goldblatt, P.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Morrison, Joana
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2014-10-06
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1040-1040
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036986260
Cited by
92
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University College London
  • European Commission (278350)
  • University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
parenting support, social inequality, child health, child development, early childhood, disadvantaged children, home visiting, parent education, fine motor skills, cognitive development, early childhood intervention
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Europe, Female, Humans, Parenting, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review