Cited by 100Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

ADAMTS proteoglycanases in the physiological and pathological central nervous system.

Open access
Lemarchant, Sighild, Pruvost, Mathilde, Montaner, Joan, Emery, Evelyne, Vivien, Denis, Kanninen, Katja, Koistinaho, Jari·2013·Journal of Neuroinflammation

Abstract

ADAMTS-1, -4, -5 and -9 belong to 'a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS)' family and more precisely to the proteoglycanases subgroup based on their common ability to degrade chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans. They have been extensively investigated for their involvement in inflammation-induced osteoarthritis, and a growing body of evidence indicates that they may be of key importance in the physiological and pathological central nervous system (CNS). In this review, we discuss the deregulated expression of ADAMTS proteoglycanases during acute CNS injuries, such as stroke and spinal cord injury. Then, we provide new insights on ADAMTS proteoglycanases mediating synaptic plasticity, neurorepair, angiogenesis and inflammation mechanisms. Altogether, this review allows us to propose that ADAMTS proteoglycanases may be original therapeutic targets for CNS injuries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1742-2094-10-133

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lemarchant, S., Pruvost, M., Montaner, J., Emery, E., Vivien, D., Kanninen, K., & Koistinaho, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Lemarchant, Sighild
Venue
Journal of Neuroinflammation
Published
2013-10-31
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
133-133
ISSN
1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107027445
Cited by
96
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Itä-Suomen Yliopisto
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
ADAMTS1, ADAMTS-4, ADAMTS5, central nervous system injury, stroke, spinal cord injury, synaptic plasticity, neurorepair, angiogenesis, neuroinflammation, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
ADAMTS1 Protein, ADAMTS5 Protein, ADAMTS9 Protein, ADAMTS4 Protein, Animals, Central Nervous System, Humans, Procollagen N-Endopeptidase, ADAM Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review