Cited by 29School Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation SciencePhysical Activity and Health

Assessing sustainability of Lifestyle Education for Activity Program (LEAP)

Open access
Saunders, R. P., Pate, R. R., Dowda, M., Ward, D. S., Epping, J. N., Dishman, R. K.·2012·Health Education Research

Abstract

Sustained intervention effects are needed for positive health impacts in populations; however, few published examples illustrate methods for assessing sustainability in health promotion programs. This paper describes the methods for assessing sustainability of the Lifestyle Education for Activity Program (LEAP). LEAP was a comprehensive school-based intervention that targeted change in instructional practices and the school environment to promote physical activity (PA) in high school girls. Previous reports indicated that significantly more girls in the intervention compared with control schools reported engaging in vigorous PA, and positive long-term effects on vigorous PA also were observed for girls in schools that most fully implemented and maintained the intervention 3 years following the active intervention. In this paper, the seven steps used to assess sustainability in LEAP are presented; these steps provide a model for assessing sustainability in health promotion programs in other settings. Unique features of the LEAP sustainability model include assessing sustainability of changes in instructional practices and the environment, basing assessment on an essential element framework that defined complete and acceptable delivery at the beginning of the project, using multiple data sources to assess sustainability, and assessing implementation longitudinally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cyr111

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approaches to monitoring included diverse areas to assess including having appropriate data to document progress, having a management or monitoring system in place, and having regular reporting and feedback mechanisms.

    “Approaches to monitoring included diverse areas to assess including having appropriate data to document progress [64, 65], having a management or monitoring system in place [15, 53, 61, 66, 67], and having regular reporting and feedback mechanisms [46, 47, 52, 54, 68, 69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saunders, R. P., Pate, R. R., Dowda, M., Ward, D. S., Epping, J. N., & Dishman, R. K.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Saunders, R. P.
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2011-12-08
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
319-330
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2128907303
Cited by
29
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL057775, HL57775)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
intervention sustainability, school-based physical activity promotion, high school girls, physical activity, instructional practices, school environment, health promotion programs, longitudinal assessment, multi-source data
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Life Style, Male, Motor Activity, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review